Temporal trends in geographic disparities in small-area breast cancer incidence and mortality, 1988 to 2005

Mario Schootman, Min Lian, Anjali D. Deshpande, Elizabeth A. Baker, Sandi L. Pruitt, Rebecca Aft, Donna B. Jeffe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: A goal of Healthy People 2010 was to reduce health disparities. We determined the extent of reductions in geographic disparities in five breast cancer screening indicators. Methods: We examined the extent of reductions in geographic disparities in five breast cancer screening indicators using data about women ages 40 years and older from 200 counties in the 1988 to 2005 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. County-level trends in five breast cancer indicators (in situ, stage I, lymph node-positive, locally advanced, and mortality) were summarized using the estimated annual percentage change. Observed county rates were smoothed using hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal methods to calculate measures of absolute and relative geographic disparity and their changes over time. Results: For in situ breast cancer, absolute disparity increased 93.7% during 1988 to 2005. Relative disparity declined 61.5% during the entire study period. Absolute and relative disparity for stage I breast cancer declined 18.5% and 41.4%, respectively. Absolute disparity for lymph node-positive breast cancer declined 37.9% during the study period, whereas relative disparity declined 17.6%. Absolute disparity for locally advanced breast cancer declined 66.5%, whereas relative disparity declined 17.8% during the study period. Absolute disparity in breast cancer mortality declined 60.5%, whereas relative disparity declined 19.8%. Conclusions: Absolute and relative geographic disparities narrowed over time for all breast cancer indicators except for in situ breast cancer. Impact: Progress has been made toward reducing geographic disparities in breast cancer outcomes, particularly in advanced-stage breast cancer incidence and mortality rates, although disparities remain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1122-1131
Number of pages10
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Breast Neoplasms
Mortality
Incidence
Early Detection of Cancer
Lymph Nodes
Healthy People Programs
SEER Program
Bayes Theorem
Databases
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Temporal trends in geographic disparities in small-area breast cancer incidence and mortality, 1988 to 2005. / Schootman, Mario; Lian, Min; Deshpande, Anjali D.; Baker, Elizabeth A.; Pruitt, Sandi L.; Aft, Rebecca; Jeffe, Donna B.

In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, Vol. 19, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 1122-1131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schootman, Mario ; Lian, Min ; Deshpande, Anjali D. ; Baker, Elizabeth A. ; Pruitt, Sandi L. ; Aft, Rebecca ; Jeffe, Donna B. / Temporal trends in geographic disparities in small-area breast cancer incidence and mortality, 1988 to 2005. In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 1122-1131.
@article{787c697e3481439aa4794ddc1ca343d3,
title = "Temporal trends in geographic disparities in small-area breast cancer incidence and mortality, 1988 to 2005",
abstract = "Background: A goal of Healthy People 2010 was to reduce health disparities. We determined the extent of reductions in geographic disparities in five breast cancer screening indicators. Methods: We examined the extent of reductions in geographic disparities in five breast cancer screening indicators using data about women ages 40 years and older from 200 counties in the 1988 to 2005 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. County-level trends in five breast cancer indicators (in situ, stage I, lymph node-positive, locally advanced, and mortality) were summarized using the estimated annual percentage change. Observed county rates were smoothed using hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal methods to calculate measures of absolute and relative geographic disparity and their changes over time. Results: For in situ breast cancer, absolute disparity increased 93.7{\%} during 1988 to 2005. Relative disparity declined 61.5{\%} during the entire study period. Absolute and relative disparity for stage I breast cancer declined 18.5{\%} and 41.4{\%}, respectively. Absolute disparity for lymph node-positive breast cancer declined 37.9{\%} during the study period, whereas relative disparity declined 17.6{\%}. Absolute disparity for locally advanced breast cancer declined 66.5{\%}, whereas relative disparity declined 17.8{\%} during the study period. Absolute disparity in breast cancer mortality declined 60.5{\%}, whereas relative disparity declined 19.8{\%}. Conclusions: Absolute and relative geographic disparities narrowed over time for all breast cancer indicators except for in situ breast cancer. Impact: Progress has been made toward reducing geographic disparities in breast cancer outcomes, particularly in advanced-stage breast cancer incidence and mortality rates, although disparities remain.",
author = "Mario Schootman and Min Lian and Deshpande, {Anjali D.} and Baker, {Elizabeth A.} and Pruitt, {Sandi L.} and Rebecca Aft and Jeffe, {Donna B.}",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0966",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1122--1131",
journal = "Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention",
issn = "1055-9965",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporal trends in geographic disparities in small-area breast cancer incidence and mortality, 1988 to 2005

AU - Schootman, Mario

AU - Lian, Min

AU - Deshpande, Anjali D.

AU - Baker, Elizabeth A.

AU - Pruitt, Sandi L.

AU - Aft, Rebecca

AU - Jeffe, Donna B.

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Background: A goal of Healthy People 2010 was to reduce health disparities. We determined the extent of reductions in geographic disparities in five breast cancer screening indicators. Methods: We examined the extent of reductions in geographic disparities in five breast cancer screening indicators using data about women ages 40 years and older from 200 counties in the 1988 to 2005 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. County-level trends in five breast cancer indicators (in situ, stage I, lymph node-positive, locally advanced, and mortality) were summarized using the estimated annual percentage change. Observed county rates were smoothed using hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal methods to calculate measures of absolute and relative geographic disparity and their changes over time. Results: For in situ breast cancer, absolute disparity increased 93.7% during 1988 to 2005. Relative disparity declined 61.5% during the entire study period. Absolute and relative disparity for stage I breast cancer declined 18.5% and 41.4%, respectively. Absolute disparity for lymph node-positive breast cancer declined 37.9% during the study period, whereas relative disparity declined 17.6%. Absolute disparity for locally advanced breast cancer declined 66.5%, whereas relative disparity declined 17.8% during the study period. Absolute disparity in breast cancer mortality declined 60.5%, whereas relative disparity declined 19.8%. Conclusions: Absolute and relative geographic disparities narrowed over time for all breast cancer indicators except for in situ breast cancer. Impact: Progress has been made toward reducing geographic disparities in breast cancer outcomes, particularly in advanced-stage breast cancer incidence and mortality rates, although disparities remain.

AB - Background: A goal of Healthy People 2010 was to reduce health disparities. We determined the extent of reductions in geographic disparities in five breast cancer screening indicators. Methods: We examined the extent of reductions in geographic disparities in five breast cancer screening indicators using data about women ages 40 years and older from 200 counties in the 1988 to 2005 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. County-level trends in five breast cancer indicators (in situ, stage I, lymph node-positive, locally advanced, and mortality) were summarized using the estimated annual percentage change. Observed county rates were smoothed using hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal methods to calculate measures of absolute and relative geographic disparity and their changes over time. Results: For in situ breast cancer, absolute disparity increased 93.7% during 1988 to 2005. Relative disparity declined 61.5% during the entire study period. Absolute and relative disparity for stage I breast cancer declined 18.5% and 41.4%, respectively. Absolute disparity for lymph node-positive breast cancer declined 37.9% during the study period, whereas relative disparity declined 17.6%. Absolute disparity for locally advanced breast cancer declined 66.5%, whereas relative disparity declined 17.8% during the study period. Absolute disparity in breast cancer mortality declined 60.5%, whereas relative disparity declined 19.8%. Conclusions: Absolute and relative geographic disparities narrowed over time for all breast cancer indicators except for in situ breast cancer. Impact: Progress has been made toward reducing geographic disparities in breast cancer outcomes, particularly in advanced-stage breast cancer incidence and mortality rates, although disparities remain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950797755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950797755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0966

DO - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0966

M3 - Article

C2 - 20354128

AN - SCOPUS:77950797755

VL - 19

SP - 1122

EP - 1131

JO - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

JF - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

SN - 1055-9965

IS - 4

ER -