Test-retest precision of functional MR in sensory and motor task activation

F. Zerrin Yetkin, Timothy L. McAuliffe, Robert Cox, Victor M. Haughton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

108 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the test-retest precision of functional MR maps of regions in the brain 'activated' by sensory, motor, and cognitive tasks. METHODS: Echo-planar images were acquired at 1.5 T in four subjects during voluntary motor activity involving the thumb and fingers and during tactile stimulation of the palm. Each subject performed the two tasks twice. Functional images of each task were generated at three thresholds. Test- retest precision was calculated in terms of two ratios: 1) the pixels activated in both iterations of the tasks in proportion to the pixels activated by either iteration of the task, and 2) the ratio modified to include first-order neighboring pixels. The first is referred to as pixel precision, and the latter as first-order-neighbor pixel precision. RESULTS: In each subject, activation from the first and second iteration of each task was located in the same region of the same gyrus. Pixel precision was .57 for the two tasks (at a threshold of 0.50). First-order-neighbor precision was greater than .80 for the two tasks at the same threshold. CONCLUSION: High test-retest precision can be obtained in functional MR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-98
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume17
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Thumb
Touch
Fingers
Motor Activity
Brain

Keywords

  • Efficacy studies
  • Magnetic resonance, functional

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Test-retest precision of functional MR in sensory and motor task activation. / Yetkin, F. Zerrin; McAuliffe, Timothy L.; Cox, Robert; Haughton, Victor M.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1996, p. 95-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yetkin, F. Zerrin ; McAuliffe, Timothy L. ; Cox, Robert ; Haughton, Victor M. / Test-retest precision of functional MR in sensory and motor task activation. In: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1996 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 95-98.
@article{4e18a26938a142c8b5d88f745785d58d,
title = "Test-retest precision of functional MR in sensory and motor task activation",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To determine the test-retest precision of functional MR maps of regions in the brain 'activated' by sensory, motor, and cognitive tasks. METHODS: Echo-planar images were acquired at 1.5 T in four subjects during voluntary motor activity involving the thumb and fingers and during tactile stimulation of the palm. Each subject performed the two tasks twice. Functional images of each task were generated at three thresholds. Test- retest precision was calculated in terms of two ratios: 1) the pixels activated in both iterations of the tasks in proportion to the pixels activated by either iteration of the task, and 2) the ratio modified to include first-order neighboring pixels. The first is referred to as pixel precision, and the latter as first-order-neighbor pixel precision. RESULTS: In each subject, activation from the first and second iteration of each task was located in the same region of the same gyrus. Pixel precision was .57 for the two tasks (at a threshold of 0.50). First-order-neighbor precision was greater than .80 for the two tasks at the same threshold. CONCLUSION: High test-retest precision can be obtained in functional MR.",
keywords = "Efficacy studies, Magnetic resonance, functional",
author = "Yetkin, {F. Zerrin} and McAuliffe, {Timothy L.} and Robert Cox and Haughton, {Victor M.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "95--98",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Test-retest precision of functional MR in sensory and motor task activation

AU - Yetkin, F. Zerrin

AU - McAuliffe, Timothy L.

AU - Cox, Robert

AU - Haughton, Victor M.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - PURPOSE: To determine the test-retest precision of functional MR maps of regions in the brain 'activated' by sensory, motor, and cognitive tasks. METHODS: Echo-planar images were acquired at 1.5 T in four subjects during voluntary motor activity involving the thumb and fingers and during tactile stimulation of the palm. Each subject performed the two tasks twice. Functional images of each task were generated at three thresholds. Test- retest precision was calculated in terms of two ratios: 1) the pixels activated in both iterations of the tasks in proportion to the pixels activated by either iteration of the task, and 2) the ratio modified to include first-order neighboring pixels. The first is referred to as pixel precision, and the latter as first-order-neighbor pixel precision. RESULTS: In each subject, activation from the first and second iteration of each task was located in the same region of the same gyrus. Pixel precision was .57 for the two tasks (at a threshold of 0.50). First-order-neighbor precision was greater than .80 for the two tasks at the same threshold. CONCLUSION: High test-retest precision can be obtained in functional MR.

AB - PURPOSE: To determine the test-retest precision of functional MR maps of regions in the brain 'activated' by sensory, motor, and cognitive tasks. METHODS: Echo-planar images were acquired at 1.5 T in four subjects during voluntary motor activity involving the thumb and fingers and during tactile stimulation of the palm. Each subject performed the two tasks twice. Functional images of each task were generated at three thresholds. Test- retest precision was calculated in terms of two ratios: 1) the pixels activated in both iterations of the tasks in proportion to the pixels activated by either iteration of the task, and 2) the ratio modified to include first-order neighboring pixels. The first is referred to as pixel precision, and the latter as first-order-neighbor pixel precision. RESULTS: In each subject, activation from the first and second iteration of each task was located in the same region of the same gyrus. Pixel precision was .57 for the two tasks (at a threshold of 0.50). First-order-neighbor precision was greater than .80 for the two tasks at the same threshold. CONCLUSION: High test-retest precision can be obtained in functional MR.

KW - Efficacy studies

KW - Magnetic resonance, functional

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030064437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030064437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 95

EP - 98

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 1

ER -