Test-retest reliability of self-reported mammography in women veterans

Semilla Rivera, Sally W. Vernon, Jasmin A. Tiro, Sharon Coan, Deborah del Junco, Wen Chan, Ann Coker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background.: Mammography self-report is used to monitor screening and evaluate intervention trends; however, few studies have examined reliability. Methods.: Reliability of self-reported lifetime number of mammograms, most recent mammogram date, and predictors of reliability were assessed using data from Project H.O.M.E. The study population was 2494 women 52 years and over, listed in the U.S. National Registry of Women Veterans, with no history of breast cancer, who completed both baseline (2000-2002) and year 1 (2002-2003) surveys. Results.: Reliability of lifetime number of mammograms was 60.9% for exact consistency and 79.9% for consistency within one mammogram. Thirty-five percent was exactly consistent in reporting mammogram date; 55.6% was consistent within 3 months. Completing both surveys by mail and reporting fewer lifetime mammograms at baseline were positively associated with consistency of reporting lifetime number. White race/ethnicity, having a Bachelor's degree, reporting a healthcare provider's recommendation for a mammogram, having a screening mammogram, completing both surveys by mail, and being in the maintenance or action stages of change were associated with consistency in reporting date. Conclusions.: Reliability varies with the measure of self-reported mammography. Likewise, predictors show different patterns of association with different definitions. Our findings call attention to the need for explicit definitions and measures of mammography use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-326
Number of pages7
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Veterans
Mammography
Reproducibility of Results
Postal Service
Health Personnel
Self Report
Registries
Maintenance
Breast Neoplasms
Population
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Mammography/utilization
  • Reproducibility of results
  • Self-reports

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Rivera, S., Vernon, S. W., Tiro, J. A., Coan, S., del Junco, D., Chan, W., & Coker, A. (2006). Test-retest reliability of self-reported mammography in women veterans. Preventive Medicine, 42(4), 320-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.12.001

Test-retest reliability of self-reported mammography in women veterans. / Rivera, Semilla; Vernon, Sally W.; Tiro, Jasmin A.; Coan, Sharon; del Junco, Deborah; Chan, Wen; Coker, Ann.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 42, No. 4, 04.2006, p. 320-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rivera, S, Vernon, SW, Tiro, JA, Coan, S, del Junco, D, Chan, W & Coker, A 2006, 'Test-retest reliability of self-reported mammography in women veterans', Preventive Medicine, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 320-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.12.001
Rivera, Semilla ; Vernon, Sally W. ; Tiro, Jasmin A. ; Coan, Sharon ; del Junco, Deborah ; Chan, Wen ; Coker, Ann. / Test-retest reliability of self-reported mammography in women veterans. In: Preventive Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 42, No. 4. pp. 320-326.
@article{b31ffc18ead8469ba1397836ea171a7d,
title = "Test-retest reliability of self-reported mammography in women veterans",
abstract = "Background.: Mammography self-report is used to monitor screening and evaluate intervention trends; however, few studies have examined reliability. Methods.: Reliability of self-reported lifetime number of mammograms, most recent mammogram date, and predictors of reliability were assessed using data from Project H.O.M.E. The study population was 2494 women 52 years and over, listed in the U.S. National Registry of Women Veterans, with no history of breast cancer, who completed both baseline (2000-2002) and year 1 (2002-2003) surveys. Results.: Reliability of lifetime number of mammograms was 60.9{\%} for exact consistency and 79.9{\%} for consistency within one mammogram. Thirty-five percent was exactly consistent in reporting mammogram date; 55.6{\%} was consistent within 3 months. Completing both surveys by mail and reporting fewer lifetime mammograms at baseline were positively associated with consistency of reporting lifetime number. White race/ethnicity, having a Bachelor's degree, reporting a healthcare provider's recommendation for a mammogram, having a screening mammogram, completing both surveys by mail, and being in the maintenance or action stages of change were associated with consistency in reporting date. Conclusions.: Reliability varies with the measure of self-reported mammography. Likewise, predictors show different patterns of association with different definitions. Our findings call attention to the need for explicit definitions and measures of mammography use.",
keywords = "Mammography/utilization, Reproducibility of results, Self-reports",
author = "Semilla Rivera and Vernon, {Sally W.} and Tiro, {Jasmin A.} and Sharon Coan and {del Junco}, Deborah and Wen Chan and Ann Coker",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.12.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "320--326",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Test-retest reliability of self-reported mammography in women veterans

AU - Rivera, Semilla

AU - Vernon, Sally W.

AU - Tiro, Jasmin A.

AU - Coan, Sharon

AU - del Junco, Deborah

AU - Chan, Wen

AU - Coker, Ann

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - Background.: Mammography self-report is used to monitor screening and evaluate intervention trends; however, few studies have examined reliability. Methods.: Reliability of self-reported lifetime number of mammograms, most recent mammogram date, and predictors of reliability were assessed using data from Project H.O.M.E. The study population was 2494 women 52 years and over, listed in the U.S. National Registry of Women Veterans, with no history of breast cancer, who completed both baseline (2000-2002) and year 1 (2002-2003) surveys. Results.: Reliability of lifetime number of mammograms was 60.9% for exact consistency and 79.9% for consistency within one mammogram. Thirty-five percent was exactly consistent in reporting mammogram date; 55.6% was consistent within 3 months. Completing both surveys by mail and reporting fewer lifetime mammograms at baseline were positively associated with consistency of reporting lifetime number. White race/ethnicity, having a Bachelor's degree, reporting a healthcare provider's recommendation for a mammogram, having a screening mammogram, completing both surveys by mail, and being in the maintenance or action stages of change were associated with consistency in reporting date. Conclusions.: Reliability varies with the measure of self-reported mammography. Likewise, predictors show different patterns of association with different definitions. Our findings call attention to the need for explicit definitions and measures of mammography use.

AB - Background.: Mammography self-report is used to monitor screening and evaluate intervention trends; however, few studies have examined reliability. Methods.: Reliability of self-reported lifetime number of mammograms, most recent mammogram date, and predictors of reliability were assessed using data from Project H.O.M.E. The study population was 2494 women 52 years and over, listed in the U.S. National Registry of Women Veterans, with no history of breast cancer, who completed both baseline (2000-2002) and year 1 (2002-2003) surveys. Results.: Reliability of lifetime number of mammograms was 60.9% for exact consistency and 79.9% for consistency within one mammogram. Thirty-five percent was exactly consistent in reporting mammogram date; 55.6% was consistent within 3 months. Completing both surveys by mail and reporting fewer lifetime mammograms at baseline were positively associated with consistency of reporting lifetime number. White race/ethnicity, having a Bachelor's degree, reporting a healthcare provider's recommendation for a mammogram, having a screening mammogram, completing both surveys by mail, and being in the maintenance or action stages of change were associated with consistency in reporting date. Conclusions.: Reliability varies with the measure of self-reported mammography. Likewise, predictors show different patterns of association with different definitions. Our findings call attention to the need for explicit definitions and measures of mammography use.

KW - Mammography/utilization

KW - Reproducibility of results

KW - Self-reports

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646008280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646008280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.12.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 16442154

AN - SCOPUS:33646008280

VL - 42

SP - 320

EP - 326

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

IS - 4

ER -