The accuracy of electrocardiogram-controlled central line placement

Ralf E. Gebhard, Peter Szmuk, Evan G. Pivalizza, Vladimir Melnikov, Christianne Vogt, Robert D. Warters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiogram (ECG) guidance to confirm accurate positioning of central venous catheters (CVC), placed before surgery in the operating room, is rarely used in the United States. We designed this randomized, controlled trial to investigate whether the use of this technique impacts the accuracy of CVC placement. METHODS: Patients in group ECG (n = 147) had a CVC placed using right-atrial ECG to guide catheter tip positioning. CVCs in group NO-ECG (n = 143) were positioned without this technique. RESULTS: Overall, guidewire-ECG control resulted in more correctly positioned CVCs (96% vs 76%, P ≤ 0.001) without increasing placement time. Significantly more CVCs were placed in the middle of the superior vena cava in group ECG (P ≤ 0.001), although placement into the right atrium or right ventricle and into other vessels occurred significantly more often in group NO-ECG (P ≤ 0.001). Twenty patients in group NO-ECG required repositioning of their CVC after surgery, whereas this maneuver was necessary only in three patients in group ECG (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ECG guidance allows for more accurate CVC placement, and should be considered to increase patient safety and reduce costs associated with repositioning procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-70
Number of pages6
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume104
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Electrocardiography
Central Venous Catheters
Superior Vena Cava
Operating Rooms
Patient Safety
Heart Atria
Heart Ventricles
Catheters
Randomized Controlled Trials
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Gebhard, R. E., Szmuk, P., Pivalizza, E. G., Melnikov, V., Vogt, C., & Warters, R. D. (2007). The accuracy of electrocardiogram-controlled central line placement. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 104(1), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000250224.02440.fe

The accuracy of electrocardiogram-controlled central line placement. / Gebhard, Ralf E.; Szmuk, Peter; Pivalizza, Evan G.; Melnikov, Vladimir; Vogt, Christianne; Warters, Robert D.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 104, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 65-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gebhard, RE, Szmuk, P, Pivalizza, EG, Melnikov, V, Vogt, C & Warters, RD 2007, 'The accuracy of electrocardiogram-controlled central line placement', Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000250224.02440.fe
Gebhard, Ralf E. ; Szmuk, Peter ; Pivalizza, Evan G. ; Melnikov, Vladimir ; Vogt, Christianne ; Warters, Robert D. / The accuracy of electrocardiogram-controlled central line placement. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2007 ; Vol. 104, No. 1. pp. 65-70.
@article{24e5535f77fb49fc8a191c52e8789238,
title = "The accuracy of electrocardiogram-controlled central line placement",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Electrocardiogram (ECG) guidance to confirm accurate positioning of central venous catheters (CVC), placed before surgery in the operating room, is rarely used in the United States. We designed this randomized, controlled trial to investigate whether the use of this technique impacts the accuracy of CVC placement. METHODS: Patients in group ECG (n = 147) had a CVC placed using right-atrial ECG to guide catheter tip positioning. CVCs in group NO-ECG (n = 143) were positioned without this technique. RESULTS: Overall, guidewire-ECG control resulted in more correctly positioned CVCs (96{\%} vs 76{\%}, P ≤ 0.001) without increasing placement time. Significantly more CVCs were placed in the middle of the superior vena cava in group ECG (P ≤ 0.001), although placement into the right atrium or right ventricle and into other vessels occurred significantly more often in group NO-ECG (P ≤ 0.001). Twenty patients in group NO-ECG required repositioning of their CVC after surgery, whereas this maneuver was necessary only in three patients in group ECG (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ECG guidance allows for more accurate CVC placement, and should be considered to increase patient safety and reduce costs associated with repositioning procedures.",
author = "Gebhard, {Ralf E.} and Peter Szmuk and Pivalizza, {Evan G.} and Vladimir Melnikov and Christianne Vogt and Warters, {Robert D.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1213/01.ane.0000250224.02440.fe",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "65--70",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The accuracy of electrocardiogram-controlled central line placement

AU - Gebhard, Ralf E.

AU - Szmuk, Peter

AU - Pivalizza, Evan G.

AU - Melnikov, Vladimir

AU - Vogt, Christianne

AU - Warters, Robert D.

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Electrocardiogram (ECG) guidance to confirm accurate positioning of central venous catheters (CVC), placed before surgery in the operating room, is rarely used in the United States. We designed this randomized, controlled trial to investigate whether the use of this technique impacts the accuracy of CVC placement. METHODS: Patients in group ECG (n = 147) had a CVC placed using right-atrial ECG to guide catheter tip positioning. CVCs in group NO-ECG (n = 143) were positioned without this technique. RESULTS: Overall, guidewire-ECG control resulted in more correctly positioned CVCs (96% vs 76%, P ≤ 0.001) without increasing placement time. Significantly more CVCs were placed in the middle of the superior vena cava in group ECG (P ≤ 0.001), although placement into the right atrium or right ventricle and into other vessels occurred significantly more often in group NO-ECG (P ≤ 0.001). Twenty patients in group NO-ECG required repositioning of their CVC after surgery, whereas this maneuver was necessary only in three patients in group ECG (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ECG guidance allows for more accurate CVC placement, and should be considered to increase patient safety and reduce costs associated with repositioning procedures.

AB - BACKGROUND: Electrocardiogram (ECG) guidance to confirm accurate positioning of central venous catheters (CVC), placed before surgery in the operating room, is rarely used in the United States. We designed this randomized, controlled trial to investigate whether the use of this technique impacts the accuracy of CVC placement. METHODS: Patients in group ECG (n = 147) had a CVC placed using right-atrial ECG to guide catheter tip positioning. CVCs in group NO-ECG (n = 143) were positioned without this technique. RESULTS: Overall, guidewire-ECG control resulted in more correctly positioned CVCs (96% vs 76%, P ≤ 0.001) without increasing placement time. Significantly more CVCs were placed in the middle of the superior vena cava in group ECG (P ≤ 0.001), although placement into the right atrium or right ventricle and into other vessels occurred significantly more often in group NO-ECG (P ≤ 0.001). Twenty patients in group NO-ECG required repositioning of their CVC after surgery, whereas this maneuver was necessary only in three patients in group ECG (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ECG guidance allows for more accurate CVC placement, and should be considered to increase patient safety and reduce costs associated with repositioning procedures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847620165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847620165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/01.ane.0000250224.02440.fe

DO - 10.1213/01.ane.0000250224.02440.fe

M3 - Article

C2 - 17179244

AN - SCOPUS:33847620165

VL - 104

SP - 65

EP - 70

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 1

ER -