The acutely infected diabetic foot is not adequately evaluated in an inpatient setting

Gary W. Edelson, David G. Armstrong, Lawrence A. Lavery, Gene Caicco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the standard of evaluation and treatment of the infected diabetic foot ulceration at a 551-bed university teaching institution. Design: A retrospective review of a 4-year consecutive sample (1991-1994). Population: Two hundred fifty-five patients who were admitted to a hospital for care of an infected diabetic foot ulceration. Patients were subdivided into the following 4 dichotomous variables: (1) whether the patient underwent a lower-extremity amputation, (2) whether the patient was admitted once or multiple times, (3) whether the patient underwent intraoperative debridement, and (4) whether the patient was admitted to medical or surgical services. Results: All groups that were evaluated had undergone a less than adequate foot examination. Of the admitted patients, 31.4% did not have their pedal pulses documented; 59.7% of the admitted patients were not evaluated for the presence or absence of protective sensation. Nearly 90% of the wounds were not evaluated for involvement of underlying structures, and foot radiographs were not performed in 32.9% of the patients. There were more blood cultures ordered (62.0%) than wound cultures (51.4%). Conclusion: The results of this study highlight the need for a systematic, detailed lower-extremity examination for every diabetic patient who is admitted to a hospital, particularly those who are admitted with a primary diagnosis that involves a foot complication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)260-265
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume87
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Diabetic Foot
Inpatients
Foot
Lower Extremity
Wounds and Injuries
Debridement
Amputation
Teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

The acutely infected diabetic foot is not adequately evaluated in an inpatient setting. / Edelson, Gary W.; Armstrong, David G.; Lavery, Lawrence A.; Caicco, Gene.

In: Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, Vol. 87, No. 6, 1997, p. 260-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{346a03156b2748adb1c43b9ba88c7d09,
title = "The acutely infected diabetic foot is not adequately evaluated in an inpatient setting",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the standard of evaluation and treatment of the infected diabetic foot ulceration at a 551-bed university teaching institution. Design: A retrospective review of a 4-year consecutive sample (1991-1994). Population: Two hundred fifty-five patients who were admitted to a hospital for care of an infected diabetic foot ulceration. Patients were subdivided into the following 4 dichotomous variables: (1) whether the patient underwent a lower-extremity amputation, (2) whether the patient was admitted once or multiple times, (3) whether the patient underwent intraoperative debridement, and (4) whether the patient was admitted to medical or surgical services. Results: All groups that were evaluated had undergone a less than adequate foot examination. Of the admitted patients, 31.4{\%} did not have their pedal pulses documented; 59.7{\%} of the admitted patients were not evaluated for the presence or absence of protective sensation. Nearly 90{\%} of the wounds were not evaluated for involvement of underlying structures, and foot radiographs were not performed in 32.9{\%} of the patients. There were more blood cultures ordered (62.0{\%}) than wound cultures (51.4{\%}). Conclusion: The results of this study highlight the need for a systematic, detailed lower-extremity examination for every diabetic patient who is admitted to a hospital, particularly those who are admitted with a primary diagnosis that involves a foot complication.",
author = "Edelson, {Gary W.} and Armstrong, {David G.} and Lavery, {Lawrence A.} and Gene Caicco",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "260--265",
journal = "Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association",
issn = "8750-7315",
publisher = "American Podiatric Medical Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The acutely infected diabetic foot is not adequately evaluated in an inpatient setting

AU - Edelson, Gary W.

AU - Armstrong, David G.

AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.

AU - Caicco, Gene

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the standard of evaluation and treatment of the infected diabetic foot ulceration at a 551-bed university teaching institution. Design: A retrospective review of a 4-year consecutive sample (1991-1994). Population: Two hundred fifty-five patients who were admitted to a hospital for care of an infected diabetic foot ulceration. Patients were subdivided into the following 4 dichotomous variables: (1) whether the patient underwent a lower-extremity amputation, (2) whether the patient was admitted once or multiple times, (3) whether the patient underwent intraoperative debridement, and (4) whether the patient was admitted to medical or surgical services. Results: All groups that were evaluated had undergone a less than adequate foot examination. Of the admitted patients, 31.4% did not have their pedal pulses documented; 59.7% of the admitted patients were not evaluated for the presence or absence of protective sensation. Nearly 90% of the wounds were not evaluated for involvement of underlying structures, and foot radiographs were not performed in 32.9% of the patients. There were more blood cultures ordered (62.0%) than wound cultures (51.4%). Conclusion: The results of this study highlight the need for a systematic, detailed lower-extremity examination for every diabetic patient who is admitted to a hospital, particularly those who are admitted with a primary diagnosis that involves a foot complication.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the standard of evaluation and treatment of the infected diabetic foot ulceration at a 551-bed university teaching institution. Design: A retrospective review of a 4-year consecutive sample (1991-1994). Population: Two hundred fifty-five patients who were admitted to a hospital for care of an infected diabetic foot ulceration. Patients were subdivided into the following 4 dichotomous variables: (1) whether the patient underwent a lower-extremity amputation, (2) whether the patient was admitted once or multiple times, (3) whether the patient underwent intraoperative debridement, and (4) whether the patient was admitted to medical or surgical services. Results: All groups that were evaluated had undergone a less than adequate foot examination. Of the admitted patients, 31.4% did not have their pedal pulses documented; 59.7% of the admitted patients were not evaluated for the presence or absence of protective sensation. Nearly 90% of the wounds were not evaluated for involvement of underlying structures, and foot radiographs were not performed in 32.9% of the patients. There were more blood cultures ordered (62.0%) than wound cultures (51.4%). Conclusion: The results of this study highlight the need for a systematic, detailed lower-extremity examination for every diabetic patient who is admitted to a hospital, particularly those who are admitted with a primary diagnosis that involves a foot complication.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031155714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031155714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 260

EP - 265

JO - Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

JF - Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

SN - 8750-7315

IS - 6

ER -