The Biobehavioral Family Model: Testing Social Support as an Additional Exogenous Variable

Sarah B. Woods, Jacob B. Priest, Tara Roush

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study tests the inclusion of social support as a distinct exogenous variable in the Biobehavioral Family Model (BBFM). The BBFM is a biopsychosocial approach to health that proposes that biobehavioral reactivity (anxiety and depression) mediates the relationship between family emotional climate and disease activity. Data for this study included married, English-speaking adult participants (n = 1,321; 55% female; M age = 45.2 years) from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, a nationally representative epidemiological study of the frequency of mental disorders in the United States. Participants reported their demographics, marital functioning, social support from friends and relatives, anxiety and depression (biobehavioral reactivity), number of chronic health conditions, and number of prescription medications. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the items used in the measures of negative marital interactions, social support, and biobehavioral reactivity, as well as the use of negative marital interactions, friends' social support, and relatives' social support as distinct factors in the model. Structural equation modeling indicated a good fit of the data to the hypothesized model (χ2 = 846.04, p = .000, SRMR = .039, CFI = .924, TLI = .914, RMSEA = .043). Negative marital interactions predicted biobehavioral reactivity (β = .38, p < .001), as did relatives' social support, inversely (β = -.16, p < .001). Biobehavioral reactivity predicted disease activity (β = .40, p < .001) and was demonstrated to be a significant mediator through tests of indirect effects. Findings are consistent with previous tests of the BBFM with adult samples, and suggest the important addition of family social support as a predicting factor in the model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)672-685
Number of pages14
JournalFamily Process
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Social Support
social support
medication
interaction
anxiety
Anxiety
Disease
Depression
comorbidity
mental disorder
Biobehavioral Sciences
health
Health
speaking
Mental Disorders
Statistical Factor Analysis
Prescriptions
Comorbidity
Epidemiologic Studies
inclusion

Keywords

  • Biopsychosocial
  • Depression
  • Family
  • Physical Health
  • Social Support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The Biobehavioral Family Model : Testing Social Support as an Additional Exogenous Variable. / Woods, Sarah B.; Priest, Jacob B.; Roush, Tara.

In: Family Process, Vol. 53, No. 4, 01.01.2014, p. 672-685.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Woods, Sarah B. ; Priest, Jacob B. ; Roush, Tara. / The Biobehavioral Family Model : Testing Social Support as an Additional Exogenous Variable. In: Family Process. 2014 ; Vol. 53, No. 4. pp. 672-685.
@article{e1a7971996d441b68d3ec0f7e16a186c,
title = "The Biobehavioral Family Model: Testing Social Support as an Additional Exogenous Variable",
abstract = "This study tests the inclusion of social support as a distinct exogenous variable in the Biobehavioral Family Model (BBFM). The BBFM is a biopsychosocial approach to health that proposes that biobehavioral reactivity (anxiety and depression) mediates the relationship between family emotional climate and disease activity. Data for this study included married, English-speaking adult participants (n = 1,321; 55{\%} female; M age = 45.2 years) from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, a nationally representative epidemiological study of the frequency of mental disorders in the United States. Participants reported their demographics, marital functioning, social support from friends and relatives, anxiety and depression (biobehavioral reactivity), number of chronic health conditions, and number of prescription medications. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the items used in the measures of negative marital interactions, social support, and biobehavioral reactivity, as well as the use of negative marital interactions, friends' social support, and relatives' social support as distinct factors in the model. Structural equation modeling indicated a good fit of the data to the hypothesized model (χ2 = 846.04, p = .000, SRMR = .039, CFI = .924, TLI = .914, RMSEA = .043). Negative marital interactions predicted biobehavioral reactivity (β = .38, p < .001), as did relatives' social support, inversely (β = -.16, p < .001). Biobehavioral reactivity predicted disease activity (β = .40, p < .001) and was demonstrated to be a significant mediator through tests of indirect effects. Findings are consistent with previous tests of the BBFM with adult samples, and suggest the important addition of family social support as a predicting factor in the model.",
keywords = "Biopsychosocial, Depression, Family, Physical Health, Social Support",
author = "Woods, {Sarah B.} and Priest, {Jacob B.} and Tara Roush",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/famp.12086",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "672--685",
journal = "Family Process",
issn = "0014-7370",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Biobehavioral Family Model

T2 - Testing Social Support as an Additional Exogenous Variable

AU - Woods, Sarah B.

AU - Priest, Jacob B.

AU - Roush, Tara

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - This study tests the inclusion of social support as a distinct exogenous variable in the Biobehavioral Family Model (BBFM). The BBFM is a biopsychosocial approach to health that proposes that biobehavioral reactivity (anxiety and depression) mediates the relationship between family emotional climate and disease activity. Data for this study included married, English-speaking adult participants (n = 1,321; 55% female; M age = 45.2 years) from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, a nationally representative epidemiological study of the frequency of mental disorders in the United States. Participants reported their demographics, marital functioning, social support from friends and relatives, anxiety and depression (biobehavioral reactivity), number of chronic health conditions, and number of prescription medications. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the items used in the measures of negative marital interactions, social support, and biobehavioral reactivity, as well as the use of negative marital interactions, friends' social support, and relatives' social support as distinct factors in the model. Structural equation modeling indicated a good fit of the data to the hypothesized model (χ2 = 846.04, p = .000, SRMR = .039, CFI = .924, TLI = .914, RMSEA = .043). Negative marital interactions predicted biobehavioral reactivity (β = .38, p < .001), as did relatives' social support, inversely (β = -.16, p < .001). Biobehavioral reactivity predicted disease activity (β = .40, p < .001) and was demonstrated to be a significant mediator through tests of indirect effects. Findings are consistent with previous tests of the BBFM with adult samples, and suggest the important addition of family social support as a predicting factor in the model.

AB - This study tests the inclusion of social support as a distinct exogenous variable in the Biobehavioral Family Model (BBFM). The BBFM is a biopsychosocial approach to health that proposes that biobehavioral reactivity (anxiety and depression) mediates the relationship between family emotional climate and disease activity. Data for this study included married, English-speaking adult participants (n = 1,321; 55% female; M age = 45.2 years) from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, a nationally representative epidemiological study of the frequency of mental disorders in the United States. Participants reported their demographics, marital functioning, social support from friends and relatives, anxiety and depression (biobehavioral reactivity), number of chronic health conditions, and number of prescription medications. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the items used in the measures of negative marital interactions, social support, and biobehavioral reactivity, as well as the use of negative marital interactions, friends' social support, and relatives' social support as distinct factors in the model. Structural equation modeling indicated a good fit of the data to the hypothesized model (χ2 = 846.04, p = .000, SRMR = .039, CFI = .924, TLI = .914, RMSEA = .043). Negative marital interactions predicted biobehavioral reactivity (β = .38, p < .001), as did relatives' social support, inversely (β = -.16, p < .001). Biobehavioral reactivity predicted disease activity (β = .40, p < .001) and was demonstrated to be a significant mediator through tests of indirect effects. Findings are consistent with previous tests of the BBFM with adult samples, and suggest the important addition of family social support as a predicting factor in the model.

KW - Biopsychosocial

KW - Depression

KW - Family

KW - Physical Health

KW - Social Support

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84913612930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84913612930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/famp.12086

DO - 10.1111/famp.12086

M3 - Article

C2 - 24981970

AN - SCOPUS:84913612930

VL - 53

SP - 672

EP - 685

JO - Family Process

JF - Family Process

SN - 0014-7370

IS - 4

ER -