The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. I. Clinical characteristics, hospital mortality, and one-year follow-up

M. C. Hindman, G. S. Wagner, M. JaRo, James M Atkins, M. M. Scheinman, R. W. DeSanctis, A. H. Hutter, L. Yeatman, M. Rubenfire, C. Pujura, M. Rubin, J. J. Morris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

176 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To provide an understanding of the clinical characteristics of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and bundle branch block, experience from five centers was accumulated. Patients in whom bundle branch block first appeared after the onset of cardiogenic shock were excluded. In 432 patients, the most common types of block were left (38%) and right with left anterior fascicular block (34%). In 42% of the patients, bundle branch block was new. Progression to high degree (second or third degree) atrioventricular (AV) block via a Type II pattern occurred in 22% of the patients. Hospital and first year follow-up mortality rates were 28% and 28%, respectively. Only 46% of the patients developed pulmonary edema or shock (Killip Class III or IV), and hospital mortality was related to the amount of heart failure (8%, 7%, 27%, 83% for Killip Classes I-IV, respectively). Patients with progression to second degree or third degree AV block via a Type II pattern had increased hospital mortality compared with patients without this complication (47% vs 23%, P<0.001). In the absence of pulmonary edema or shock, patients with Type II second degree or third degree AV block still had a higher mortality rate than patients without advanced AV block (31% vs 2%, P<0.005), with nearly all the deaths due to abrupt development of AV block. Thus, in many patients MI with bundle branch block is associated with severe heart failure. However, this was not true for a majority of the patients, in whom therapy aimed at preventing morbidity and mortality due to the bradyarrhythmia of advanced AV block might be beneficial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)679-688
Number of pages10
JournalCirculation
Volume58
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1978

Fingerprint

Bundle-Branch Block
Hospital Mortality
Myocardial Infarction
Atrioventricular Block
Pulmonary Edema
Mortality
Shock
Heart Failure
Cardiogenic Shock
Bradycardia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. I. Clinical characteristics, hospital mortality, and one-year follow-up. / Hindman, M. C.; Wagner, G. S.; JaRo, M.; Atkins, James M; Scheinman, M. M.; DeSanctis, R. W.; Hutter, A. H.; Yeatman, L.; Rubenfire, M.; Pujura, C.; Rubin, M.; Morris, J. J.

In: Circulation, Vol. 58, No. 4, 1978, p. 679-688.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hindman, MC, Wagner, GS, JaRo, M, Atkins, JM, Scheinman, MM, DeSanctis, RW, Hutter, AH, Yeatman, L, Rubenfire, M, Pujura, C, Rubin, M & Morris, JJ 1978, 'The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. I. Clinical characteristics, hospital mortality, and one-year follow-up', Circulation, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 679-688.
Hindman, M. C. ; Wagner, G. S. ; JaRo, M. ; Atkins, James M ; Scheinman, M. M. ; DeSanctis, R. W. ; Hutter, A. H. ; Yeatman, L. ; Rubenfire, M. ; Pujura, C. ; Rubin, M. ; Morris, J. J. / The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. I. Clinical characteristics, hospital mortality, and one-year follow-up. In: Circulation. 1978 ; Vol. 58, No. 4. pp. 679-688.
@article{09cc016662c64833bb9964ea27a1f952,
title = "The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. I. Clinical characteristics, hospital mortality, and one-year follow-up",
abstract = "To provide an understanding of the clinical characteristics of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and bundle branch block, experience from five centers was accumulated. Patients in whom bundle branch block first appeared after the onset of cardiogenic shock were excluded. In 432 patients, the most common types of block were left (38{\%}) and right with left anterior fascicular block (34{\%}). In 42{\%} of the patients, bundle branch block was new. Progression to high degree (second or third degree) atrioventricular (AV) block via a Type II pattern occurred in 22{\%} of the patients. Hospital and first year follow-up mortality rates were 28{\%} and 28{\%}, respectively. Only 46{\%} of the patients developed pulmonary edema or shock (Killip Class III or IV), and hospital mortality was related to the amount of heart failure (8{\%}, 7{\%}, 27{\%}, 83{\%} for Killip Classes I-IV, respectively). Patients with progression to second degree or third degree AV block via a Type II pattern had increased hospital mortality compared with patients without this complication (47{\%} vs 23{\%}, P<0.001). In the absence of pulmonary edema or shock, patients with Type II second degree or third degree AV block still had a higher mortality rate than patients without advanced AV block (31{\%} vs 2{\%}, P<0.005), with nearly all the deaths due to abrupt development of AV block. Thus, in many patients MI with bundle branch block is associated with severe heart failure. However, this was not true for a majority of the patients, in whom therapy aimed at preventing morbidity and mortality due to the bradyarrhythmia of advanced AV block might be beneficial.",
author = "Hindman, {M. C.} and Wagner, {G. S.} and M. JaRo and Atkins, {James M} and Scheinman, {M. M.} and DeSanctis, {R. W.} and Hutter, {A. H.} and L. Yeatman and M. Rubenfire and C. Pujura and M. Rubin and Morris, {J. J.}",
year = "1978",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "679--688",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. I. Clinical characteristics, hospital mortality, and one-year follow-up

AU - Hindman, M. C.

AU - Wagner, G. S.

AU - JaRo, M.

AU - Atkins, James M

AU - Scheinman, M. M.

AU - DeSanctis, R. W.

AU - Hutter, A. H.

AU - Yeatman, L.

AU - Rubenfire, M.

AU - Pujura, C.

AU - Rubin, M.

AU - Morris, J. J.

PY - 1978

Y1 - 1978

N2 - To provide an understanding of the clinical characteristics of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and bundle branch block, experience from five centers was accumulated. Patients in whom bundle branch block first appeared after the onset of cardiogenic shock were excluded. In 432 patients, the most common types of block were left (38%) and right with left anterior fascicular block (34%). In 42% of the patients, bundle branch block was new. Progression to high degree (second or third degree) atrioventricular (AV) block via a Type II pattern occurred in 22% of the patients. Hospital and first year follow-up mortality rates were 28% and 28%, respectively. Only 46% of the patients developed pulmonary edema or shock (Killip Class III or IV), and hospital mortality was related to the amount of heart failure (8%, 7%, 27%, 83% for Killip Classes I-IV, respectively). Patients with progression to second degree or third degree AV block via a Type II pattern had increased hospital mortality compared with patients without this complication (47% vs 23%, P<0.001). In the absence of pulmonary edema or shock, patients with Type II second degree or third degree AV block still had a higher mortality rate than patients without advanced AV block (31% vs 2%, P<0.005), with nearly all the deaths due to abrupt development of AV block. Thus, in many patients MI with bundle branch block is associated with severe heart failure. However, this was not true for a majority of the patients, in whom therapy aimed at preventing morbidity and mortality due to the bradyarrhythmia of advanced AV block might be beneficial.

AB - To provide an understanding of the clinical characteristics of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and bundle branch block, experience from five centers was accumulated. Patients in whom bundle branch block first appeared after the onset of cardiogenic shock were excluded. In 432 patients, the most common types of block were left (38%) and right with left anterior fascicular block (34%). In 42% of the patients, bundle branch block was new. Progression to high degree (second or third degree) atrioventricular (AV) block via a Type II pattern occurred in 22% of the patients. Hospital and first year follow-up mortality rates were 28% and 28%, respectively. Only 46% of the patients developed pulmonary edema or shock (Killip Class III or IV), and hospital mortality was related to the amount of heart failure (8%, 7%, 27%, 83% for Killip Classes I-IV, respectively). Patients with progression to second degree or third degree AV block via a Type II pattern had increased hospital mortality compared with patients without this complication (47% vs 23%, P<0.001). In the absence of pulmonary edema or shock, patients with Type II second degree or third degree AV block still had a higher mortality rate than patients without advanced AV block (31% vs 2%, P<0.005), with nearly all the deaths due to abrupt development of AV block. Thus, in many patients MI with bundle branch block is associated with severe heart failure. However, this was not true for a majority of the patients, in whom therapy aimed at preventing morbidity and mortality due to the bradyarrhythmia of advanced AV block might be beneficial.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018129794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018129794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 679

EP - 688

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 4

ER -