The concept of normality: A reply to Freides

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Comments on an article by D. Freides (see record 1960-07384-001), which presses for the elimination of the concept of normality on the grounds that there is little agreement concerning its definition, that it ascribes absolute, yet culture bound, patterns of behavior and that it disregards the flexible interactions between personality and circumstances. Although Freides concerns himself nearly exclusively with the idealist-adjustment view of normality, other approaches such as the statistical-average conception are likewise dismissed with the conclusion that "for purposes of scientific theory and also for practical clinical purposes" our emphasis must shift away from considerations of normality (or pathogenicity) and toward a greater concern with "the potentialities of every person under the proper conditions." Such a position, Korman argues, springs from too narrow a conceptualization of both scientific theory and clinical purposes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-269
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Consulting Psychology
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1961

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Virulence
Personality

Keywords

  • concept of normality
  • personality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The concept of normality : A reply to Freides. / Korman, Maurice.

In: Journal of Consulting Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 3, 06.1961, p. 267-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d64a7329b66548b3af8a76d48ab18b6f,
title = "The concept of normality: A reply to Freides",
abstract = "Comments on an article by D. Freides (see record 1960-07384-001), which presses for the elimination of the concept of normality on the grounds that there is little agreement concerning its definition, that it ascribes absolute, yet culture bound, patterns of behavior and that it disregards the flexible interactions between personality and circumstances. Although Freides concerns himself nearly exclusively with the idealist-adjustment view of normality, other approaches such as the statistical-average conception are likewise dismissed with the conclusion that {"}for purposes of scientific theory and also for practical clinical purposes{"} our emphasis must shift away from considerations of normality (or pathogenicity) and toward a greater concern with {"}the potentialities of every person under the proper conditions.{"} Such a position, Korman argues, springs from too narrow a conceptualization of both scientific theory and clinical purposes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "concept of normality, personality",
author = "Maurice Korman",
year = "1961",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/h0038266",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "267--269",
journal = "Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology",
issn = "0022-006X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The concept of normality

T2 - A reply to Freides

AU - Korman, Maurice

PY - 1961/6

Y1 - 1961/6

N2 - Comments on an article by D. Freides (see record 1960-07384-001), which presses for the elimination of the concept of normality on the grounds that there is little agreement concerning its definition, that it ascribes absolute, yet culture bound, patterns of behavior and that it disregards the flexible interactions between personality and circumstances. Although Freides concerns himself nearly exclusively with the idealist-adjustment view of normality, other approaches such as the statistical-average conception are likewise dismissed with the conclusion that "for purposes of scientific theory and also for practical clinical purposes" our emphasis must shift away from considerations of normality (or pathogenicity) and toward a greater concern with "the potentialities of every person under the proper conditions." Such a position, Korman argues, springs from too narrow a conceptualization of both scientific theory and clinical purposes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Comments on an article by D. Freides (see record 1960-07384-001), which presses for the elimination of the concept of normality on the grounds that there is little agreement concerning its definition, that it ascribes absolute, yet culture bound, patterns of behavior and that it disregards the flexible interactions between personality and circumstances. Although Freides concerns himself nearly exclusively with the idealist-adjustment view of normality, other approaches such as the statistical-average conception are likewise dismissed with the conclusion that "for purposes of scientific theory and also for practical clinical purposes" our emphasis must shift away from considerations of normality (or pathogenicity) and toward a greater concern with "the potentialities of every person under the proper conditions." Such a position, Korman argues, springs from too narrow a conceptualization of both scientific theory and clinical purposes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - concept of normality

KW - personality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149436826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149436826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/h0038266

DO - 10.1037/h0038266

M3 - Article

C2 - 13753176

AN - SCOPUS:58149436826

VL - 25

SP - 267

EP - 269

JO - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

JF - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

SN - 0022-006X

IS - 3

ER -