The effect of saline solutions on nasal patency and mucociliary clearance in rhinosinusitis patients

Garrett Hauptman, Matthew W. Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of two saline nasal sprays on nasal patency and mucociliary clearance in patients with rhinosinusitis. Study Design: Randomized double-blind trial. Subjects and Methods: Eighty patients with rhinosinusitis at a tertiary care academic center had nasal patency and mucociliary clearance measured. Each patient was then treated with either physiological or hypertonic saline. Nasal patency and mucociliary clearance measurements were repeated after treatment. Subjective evaluation was also performed. Results: Both solutions improved saccharine clearance times (P < 0.0001). Buffered physiological saline significantly affected nasal airway patency (P = 0.006). Both solutions improved symptoms of nasal stuffiness (P < 0.0001) and nasal obstruction (P < 0.0001). Buffered hypertonic saline caused increased nasal burning/irritation compared with buffered physiological saline (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Buffered physiological and buffered hypertonic saline nasal sprays both improve mucociliary clearance, which is beneficial for treatment of rhinosinusitis. Additionally, buffered physiological saline improves nasal airway patency, whereas buffered hypertonic saline has no effect. Both solutions provide symptomatic relief, but buffered hypertonic saline is more irritating.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)815-821
Number of pages7
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume137
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Mucociliary Clearance
Nose
Sodium Chloride
Nasal Sprays
Nasal Obstruction
Tertiary Care Centers
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

The effect of saline solutions on nasal patency and mucociliary clearance in rhinosinusitis patients. / Hauptman, Garrett; Ryan, Matthew W.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 137, No. 5, 11.2007, p. 815-821.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e6a98c6d69194859982a0ed28479ce2d,
title = "The effect of saline solutions on nasal patency and mucociliary clearance in rhinosinusitis patients",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the effect of two saline nasal sprays on nasal patency and mucociliary clearance in patients with rhinosinusitis. Study Design: Randomized double-blind trial. Subjects and Methods: Eighty patients with rhinosinusitis at a tertiary care academic center had nasal patency and mucociliary clearance measured. Each patient was then treated with either physiological or hypertonic saline. Nasal patency and mucociliary clearance measurements were repeated after treatment. Subjective evaluation was also performed. Results: Both solutions improved saccharine clearance times (P < 0.0001). Buffered physiological saline significantly affected nasal airway patency (P = 0.006). Both solutions improved symptoms of nasal stuffiness (P < 0.0001) and nasal obstruction (P < 0.0001). Buffered hypertonic saline caused increased nasal burning/irritation compared with buffered physiological saline (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Buffered physiological and buffered hypertonic saline nasal sprays both improve mucociliary clearance, which is beneficial for treatment of rhinosinusitis. Additionally, buffered physiological saline improves nasal airway patency, whereas buffered hypertonic saline has no effect. Both solutions provide symptomatic relief, but buffered hypertonic saline is more irritating.",
author = "Garrett Hauptman and Ryan, {Matthew W.}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.otohns.2007.07.034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
pages = "815--821",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of saline solutions on nasal patency and mucociliary clearance in rhinosinusitis patients

AU - Hauptman, Garrett

AU - Ryan, Matthew W.

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Objective: To compare the effect of two saline nasal sprays on nasal patency and mucociliary clearance in patients with rhinosinusitis. Study Design: Randomized double-blind trial. Subjects and Methods: Eighty patients with rhinosinusitis at a tertiary care academic center had nasal patency and mucociliary clearance measured. Each patient was then treated with either physiological or hypertonic saline. Nasal patency and mucociliary clearance measurements were repeated after treatment. Subjective evaluation was also performed. Results: Both solutions improved saccharine clearance times (P < 0.0001). Buffered physiological saline significantly affected nasal airway patency (P = 0.006). Both solutions improved symptoms of nasal stuffiness (P < 0.0001) and nasal obstruction (P < 0.0001). Buffered hypertonic saline caused increased nasal burning/irritation compared with buffered physiological saline (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Buffered physiological and buffered hypertonic saline nasal sprays both improve mucociliary clearance, which is beneficial for treatment of rhinosinusitis. Additionally, buffered physiological saline improves nasal airway patency, whereas buffered hypertonic saline has no effect. Both solutions provide symptomatic relief, but buffered hypertonic saline is more irritating.

AB - Objective: To compare the effect of two saline nasal sprays on nasal patency and mucociliary clearance in patients with rhinosinusitis. Study Design: Randomized double-blind trial. Subjects and Methods: Eighty patients with rhinosinusitis at a tertiary care academic center had nasal patency and mucociliary clearance measured. Each patient was then treated with either physiological or hypertonic saline. Nasal patency and mucociliary clearance measurements were repeated after treatment. Subjective evaluation was also performed. Results: Both solutions improved saccharine clearance times (P < 0.0001). Buffered physiological saline significantly affected nasal airway patency (P = 0.006). Both solutions improved symptoms of nasal stuffiness (P < 0.0001) and nasal obstruction (P < 0.0001). Buffered hypertonic saline caused increased nasal burning/irritation compared with buffered physiological saline (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Buffered physiological and buffered hypertonic saline nasal sprays both improve mucociliary clearance, which is beneficial for treatment of rhinosinusitis. Additionally, buffered physiological saline improves nasal airway patency, whereas buffered hypertonic saline has no effect. Both solutions provide symptomatic relief, but buffered hypertonic saline is more irritating.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35448933203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35448933203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.07.034

DO - 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.07.034

M3 - Article

C2 - 17967652

AN - SCOPUS:35448933203

VL - 137

SP - 815

EP - 821

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 5

ER -