The influence of fellowship training on the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy

Gregory T. Kennedy, Matthew T. McMillan, Michael H. Sprys, Claudio Bassi, Paul D. Greig, Paul D. Hansen, Dhiresh R. Jeyarajah, Tara S. Kent, Giuseppe Malleo, Giovanni Marchegiani, Rebecca M. Minter, Charles M. Vollmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background There has been a proliferation of gastrointestinal surgical fellowships; however, little is known regarding their association with surgical volume and management approaches. Methods Surveys were distributed to members of GI surgical societies. Responses were evaluated to define relationships between fellowship training and surgical practice with pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Results Surveys were completed by 889 surgeons, 84.1% of whom had completed fellowship training. Fellowship completion was associated with a primarily HPB or surgical oncology-focused practice (p < 0.001), and greater median annual PD volume (p = 0.030). Transplant and HPB fellowship-trained respondents were more likely to have high-volume (≥20) annual practice (p = 0.005 and 0.029, respectively). Regarding putative fistula mitigation strategies, HPB-trained surgeons were more likely to use stents, biologic sealants, and autologous tissue patches (p = 0.007, <0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Surgical oncology trainees reported greater autologous patch use (p = 0.003). HPB fellowship-trained surgeons were less likely to routinely use intraperitoneal drainage (p = 0.036) but more likely to utilize early (POD ≤ 3) drain amylase values to guide removal (p < 0.001). Finally, HPB fellowship-trained surgeons were more likely to use the Fistula Risk Score in their practice (29 vs. 21%, p = 0.008). Conclusion Fellowship training correlated with significant differences in surgeon experience, operative approach, and use of available fistula mitigation strategies for PD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)965-978
Number of pages14
JournalHPB
Volume18
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Fistula
Amylases
Stents
Drainage
Surgeons
Transplants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Kennedy, G. T., McMillan, M. T., Sprys, M. H., Bassi, C., Greig, P. D., Hansen, P. D., ... Vollmer, C. M. (2016). The influence of fellowship training on the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB, 18(12), 965-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.09.008

The influence of fellowship training on the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy. / Kennedy, Gregory T.; McMillan, Matthew T.; Sprys, Michael H.; Bassi, Claudio; Greig, Paul D.; Hansen, Paul D.; Jeyarajah, Dhiresh R.; Kent, Tara S.; Malleo, Giuseppe; Marchegiani, Giovanni; Minter, Rebecca M.; Vollmer, Charles M.

In: HPB, Vol. 18, No. 12, 01.12.2016, p. 965-978.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kennedy, GT, McMillan, MT, Sprys, MH, Bassi, C, Greig, PD, Hansen, PD, Jeyarajah, DR, Kent, TS, Malleo, G, Marchegiani, G, Minter, RM & Vollmer, CM 2016, 'The influence of fellowship training on the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy', HPB, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 965-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.09.008
Kennedy GT, McMillan MT, Sprys MH, Bassi C, Greig PD, Hansen PD et al. The influence of fellowship training on the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB. 2016 Dec 1;18(12):965-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.09.008
Kennedy, Gregory T. ; McMillan, Matthew T. ; Sprys, Michael H. ; Bassi, Claudio ; Greig, Paul D. ; Hansen, Paul D. ; Jeyarajah, Dhiresh R. ; Kent, Tara S. ; Malleo, Giuseppe ; Marchegiani, Giovanni ; Minter, Rebecca M. ; Vollmer, Charles M. / The influence of fellowship training on the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy. In: HPB. 2016 ; Vol. 18, No. 12. pp. 965-978.
@article{e233c4b044d747f9a15be7bda44a0e2c,
title = "The influence of fellowship training on the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy",
abstract = "Background There has been a proliferation of gastrointestinal surgical fellowships; however, little is known regarding their association with surgical volume and management approaches. Methods Surveys were distributed to members of GI surgical societies. Responses were evaluated to define relationships between fellowship training and surgical practice with pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Results Surveys were completed by 889 surgeons, 84.1{\%} of whom had completed fellowship training. Fellowship completion was associated with a primarily HPB or surgical oncology-focused practice (p < 0.001), and greater median annual PD volume (p = 0.030). Transplant and HPB fellowship-trained respondents were more likely to have high-volume (≥20) annual practice (p = 0.005 and 0.029, respectively). Regarding putative fistula mitigation strategies, HPB-trained surgeons were more likely to use stents, biologic sealants, and autologous tissue patches (p = 0.007, <0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Surgical oncology trainees reported greater autologous patch use (p = 0.003). HPB fellowship-trained surgeons were less likely to routinely use intraperitoneal drainage (p = 0.036) but more likely to utilize early (POD ≤ 3) drain amylase values to guide removal (p < 0.001). Finally, HPB fellowship-trained surgeons were more likely to use the Fistula Risk Score in their practice (29 vs. 21{\%}, p = 0.008). Conclusion Fellowship training correlated with significant differences in surgeon experience, operative approach, and use of available fistula mitigation strategies for PD.",
author = "Kennedy, {Gregory T.} and McMillan, {Matthew T.} and Sprys, {Michael H.} and Claudio Bassi and Greig, {Paul D.} and Hansen, {Paul D.} and Jeyarajah, {Dhiresh R.} and Kent, {Tara S.} and Giuseppe Malleo and Giovanni Marchegiani and Minter, {Rebecca M.} and Vollmer, {Charles M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.hpb.2016.09.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "965--978",
journal = "HPB",
issn = "1365-182X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of fellowship training on the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy

AU - Kennedy, Gregory T.

AU - McMillan, Matthew T.

AU - Sprys, Michael H.

AU - Bassi, Claudio

AU - Greig, Paul D.

AU - Hansen, Paul D.

AU - Jeyarajah, Dhiresh R.

AU - Kent, Tara S.

AU - Malleo, Giuseppe

AU - Marchegiani, Giovanni

AU - Minter, Rebecca M.

AU - Vollmer, Charles M.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Background There has been a proliferation of gastrointestinal surgical fellowships; however, little is known regarding their association with surgical volume and management approaches. Methods Surveys were distributed to members of GI surgical societies. Responses were evaluated to define relationships between fellowship training and surgical practice with pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Results Surveys were completed by 889 surgeons, 84.1% of whom had completed fellowship training. Fellowship completion was associated with a primarily HPB or surgical oncology-focused practice (p < 0.001), and greater median annual PD volume (p = 0.030). Transplant and HPB fellowship-trained respondents were more likely to have high-volume (≥20) annual practice (p = 0.005 and 0.029, respectively). Regarding putative fistula mitigation strategies, HPB-trained surgeons were more likely to use stents, biologic sealants, and autologous tissue patches (p = 0.007, <0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Surgical oncology trainees reported greater autologous patch use (p = 0.003). HPB fellowship-trained surgeons were less likely to routinely use intraperitoneal drainage (p = 0.036) but more likely to utilize early (POD ≤ 3) drain amylase values to guide removal (p < 0.001). Finally, HPB fellowship-trained surgeons were more likely to use the Fistula Risk Score in their practice (29 vs. 21%, p = 0.008). Conclusion Fellowship training correlated with significant differences in surgeon experience, operative approach, and use of available fistula mitigation strategies for PD.

AB - Background There has been a proliferation of gastrointestinal surgical fellowships; however, little is known regarding their association with surgical volume and management approaches. Methods Surveys were distributed to members of GI surgical societies. Responses were evaluated to define relationships between fellowship training and surgical practice with pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Results Surveys were completed by 889 surgeons, 84.1% of whom had completed fellowship training. Fellowship completion was associated with a primarily HPB or surgical oncology-focused practice (p < 0.001), and greater median annual PD volume (p = 0.030). Transplant and HPB fellowship-trained respondents were more likely to have high-volume (≥20) annual practice (p = 0.005 and 0.029, respectively). Regarding putative fistula mitigation strategies, HPB-trained surgeons were more likely to use stents, biologic sealants, and autologous tissue patches (p = 0.007, <0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Surgical oncology trainees reported greater autologous patch use (p = 0.003). HPB fellowship-trained surgeons were less likely to routinely use intraperitoneal drainage (p = 0.036) but more likely to utilize early (POD ≤ 3) drain amylase values to guide removal (p < 0.001). Finally, HPB fellowship-trained surgeons were more likely to use the Fistula Risk Score in their practice (29 vs. 21%, p = 0.008). Conclusion Fellowship training correlated with significant differences in surgeon experience, operative approach, and use of available fistula mitigation strategies for PD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84999886513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84999886513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.09.008

DO - 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.09.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 28029534

AN - SCOPUS:84999886513

VL - 18

SP - 965

EP - 978

JO - HPB

JF - HPB

SN - 1365-182X

IS - 12

ER -