The lattice as allosteric effector

Structural studies of αβ- and γ-tubulin clarify the role of GTP in microtubule assembly

Luke M. Rice, Elizabeth A. Montabana, David A. Agard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

127 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

GTP-dependent microtubule polymerization dynamics are required for cell division and are accompanied by domain rearrangements in the polymerizing subunit, αβ-tubulin. Two opposing models describe the role of GTP and its relationship to conformational change in αβ-tubulin. The allosteric model posits that unpolymerized αβ-tubulin adopts a more polymerization-competent conformation upon GTP binding. The lattice model posits that conformational changes occur only upon recruitment into the growing lattice. Published data support a lattice model, but are largely indirect and so the allosteric model has prevailed. We present two independent solution probes of the conformation of αβ-tubulin, the 2.3 Å crystal structure of γ-tubulin bound to GDP, and kinetic simulations to interpret the functional consequences of the structural data. These results (with our previous γ-tubulin:GTPγS structure) support the lattice model by demonstrating that major domain rearrangements do not occur in eukaryotic tubulins in response to GTP binding, and that the unpolymerized conformation of αβ-tubulin differs significantly from the polymerized one. Thus, geometric constraints of lateral self-assembly must drive αβ-tubulin conformational changes, whereas GTP plays a secondary role to tune the strength of longitudinal contacts within the microtubule lattice. αβ-Tubulin behaves like a bent spring, resisting straightening until forced to do so by GTP-mediated interactions with the growing microtubule. Kinetic simulations demonstrate that resistance to straightening opposes microtubule initiation by specifically destabilizing early assembly intermediates that are especially sensitive to the strength of lateral interactions. These data provide new insights into the molecular origins of dynamic microtubule behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5378-5383
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume105
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 8 2008

Fingerprint

Tubulin
Guanosine Triphosphate
Microtubules
Polymerization
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Cell Division

Keywords

  • Dynamic instability
  • Microtubules

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • General

Cite this

The lattice as allosteric effector : Structural studies of αβ- and γ-tubulin clarify the role of GTP in microtubule assembly. / Rice, Luke M.; Montabana, Elizabeth A.; Agard, David A.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 105, No. 14, 08.04.2008, p. 5378-5383.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{109aac6c8b584654a2dee62702c346d3,
title = "The lattice as allosteric effector: Structural studies of αβ- and γ-tubulin clarify the role of GTP in microtubule assembly",
abstract = "GTP-dependent microtubule polymerization dynamics are required for cell division and are accompanied by domain rearrangements in the polymerizing subunit, αβ-tubulin. Two opposing models describe the role of GTP and its relationship to conformational change in αβ-tubulin. The allosteric model posits that unpolymerized αβ-tubulin adopts a more polymerization-competent conformation upon GTP binding. The lattice model posits that conformational changes occur only upon recruitment into the growing lattice. Published data support a lattice model, but are largely indirect and so the allosteric model has prevailed. We present two independent solution probes of the conformation of αβ-tubulin, the 2.3 {\AA} crystal structure of γ-tubulin bound to GDP, and kinetic simulations to interpret the functional consequences of the structural data. These results (with our previous γ-tubulin:GTPγS structure) support the lattice model by demonstrating that major domain rearrangements do not occur in eukaryotic tubulins in response to GTP binding, and that the unpolymerized conformation of αβ-tubulin differs significantly from the polymerized one. Thus, geometric constraints of lateral self-assembly must drive αβ-tubulin conformational changes, whereas GTP plays a secondary role to tune the strength of longitudinal contacts within the microtubule lattice. αβ-Tubulin behaves like a bent spring, resisting straightening until forced to do so by GTP-mediated interactions with the growing microtubule. Kinetic simulations demonstrate that resistance to straightening opposes microtubule initiation by specifically destabilizing early assembly intermediates that are especially sensitive to the strength of lateral interactions. These data provide new insights into the molecular origins of dynamic microtubule behavior.",
keywords = "Dynamic instability, Microtubules",
author = "Rice, {Luke M.} and Montabana, {Elizabeth A.} and Agard, {David A.}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.0801155105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "5378--5383",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The lattice as allosteric effector

T2 - Structural studies of αβ- and γ-tubulin clarify the role of GTP in microtubule assembly

AU - Rice, Luke M.

AU - Montabana, Elizabeth A.

AU - Agard, David A.

PY - 2008/4/8

Y1 - 2008/4/8

N2 - GTP-dependent microtubule polymerization dynamics are required for cell division and are accompanied by domain rearrangements in the polymerizing subunit, αβ-tubulin. Two opposing models describe the role of GTP and its relationship to conformational change in αβ-tubulin. The allosteric model posits that unpolymerized αβ-tubulin adopts a more polymerization-competent conformation upon GTP binding. The lattice model posits that conformational changes occur only upon recruitment into the growing lattice. Published data support a lattice model, but are largely indirect and so the allosteric model has prevailed. We present two independent solution probes of the conformation of αβ-tubulin, the 2.3 Å crystal structure of γ-tubulin bound to GDP, and kinetic simulations to interpret the functional consequences of the structural data. These results (with our previous γ-tubulin:GTPγS structure) support the lattice model by demonstrating that major domain rearrangements do not occur in eukaryotic tubulins in response to GTP binding, and that the unpolymerized conformation of αβ-tubulin differs significantly from the polymerized one. Thus, geometric constraints of lateral self-assembly must drive αβ-tubulin conformational changes, whereas GTP plays a secondary role to tune the strength of longitudinal contacts within the microtubule lattice. αβ-Tubulin behaves like a bent spring, resisting straightening until forced to do so by GTP-mediated interactions with the growing microtubule. Kinetic simulations demonstrate that resistance to straightening opposes microtubule initiation by specifically destabilizing early assembly intermediates that are especially sensitive to the strength of lateral interactions. These data provide new insights into the molecular origins of dynamic microtubule behavior.

AB - GTP-dependent microtubule polymerization dynamics are required for cell division and are accompanied by domain rearrangements in the polymerizing subunit, αβ-tubulin. Two opposing models describe the role of GTP and its relationship to conformational change in αβ-tubulin. The allosteric model posits that unpolymerized αβ-tubulin adopts a more polymerization-competent conformation upon GTP binding. The lattice model posits that conformational changes occur only upon recruitment into the growing lattice. Published data support a lattice model, but are largely indirect and so the allosteric model has prevailed. We present two independent solution probes of the conformation of αβ-tubulin, the 2.3 Å crystal structure of γ-tubulin bound to GDP, and kinetic simulations to interpret the functional consequences of the structural data. These results (with our previous γ-tubulin:GTPγS structure) support the lattice model by demonstrating that major domain rearrangements do not occur in eukaryotic tubulins in response to GTP binding, and that the unpolymerized conformation of αβ-tubulin differs significantly from the polymerized one. Thus, geometric constraints of lateral self-assembly must drive αβ-tubulin conformational changes, whereas GTP plays a secondary role to tune the strength of longitudinal contacts within the microtubule lattice. αβ-Tubulin behaves like a bent spring, resisting straightening until forced to do so by GTP-mediated interactions with the growing microtubule. Kinetic simulations demonstrate that resistance to straightening opposes microtubule initiation by specifically destabilizing early assembly intermediates that are especially sensitive to the strength of lateral interactions. These data provide new insights into the molecular origins of dynamic microtubule behavior.

KW - Dynamic instability

KW - Microtubules

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44449170797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44449170797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.0801155105

DO - 10.1073/pnas.0801155105

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 5378

EP - 5383

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 14

ER -