The limitations of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in altering the natural history of blunt aortic injury

Jennifer L. Lang, Joseph P. Minei, J. Gregory Modrall, G. Patrick Clagett, R. James Valentine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is accepted treatment for blunt aortic injury (BAI). We hypothesized that immediate TEVAR would reduce deaths from aortic rupture in patients with BAI. Methods: Review of 81 patients with BAI who arrived alive at a level I trauma center over a 10-year period. Results: Twenty-three patients (28%) died within 4 hours of admission, including 12 who died of aortic rupture. Fifty-eight patients (72%) survived beyond 4 hours, and 8 (14%) ultimately died of associated injuries. Forty patients (69%) underwent aortic repair (30 open repair, 10 TEVAR), and 2 died of multisystem organ failure (MSOF). Comparing open repair to TEVAR, there were no differences in the length of hospital stay (33 ± 27 vs 33 ± 31 days), operative complications (77% vs 70%), or mortality (7% vs 0). Ten patients (17%) with minimal BAI were treated with beta blockade and observation; 4 have not healed their aortic injuries and 6 have been lost to follow-up. Thirty-three of the original 81 study patients (41%) ultimately died. Compared with the patients who died, the survivors were younger (37 vs 48 years; P = .01) and less likely to develop aortic rupture (0 vs 12; P < .001), require intubation in the field (27% vs 49%; P < .05), require cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; 2% vs 30%; P < .001), or arrive hypotensive (17% vs 67%; P < .001). Survivors also had a lower mean injury severity score (34 ± 12 vs 44 ± 12; P < .001), fewer associated injuries (3 ± 1 vs 4 ± 3; P = .02), and a higher prevalence of aortic repair (79% vs 6%; P < .001). Multivariate analysis selected no attempt at aortic repair (odds ratio [OR], 90.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-1000) and hypotension on arrival (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.4-27) as the only independent variables associated with death. Conclusion: Mortality remains high for patients with BAI, but most patients who arrive alive at the hospital do not experience aortic rupture. Rupture occurs within the first 4 hours of admission, often before the injury is recognized in time for salvage with immediate TEVAR. The decision to repair BAI was based on the extent of associated injuries and on the individual surgeon's judgment. Survival was not influenced by the timing of repair, but further studies are needed to compare the outcome of open repair vs TEVAR in patients who survive beyond 4 hours.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)290-297
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint

Nonpenetrating Wounds
Thorax
Aortic Rupture
Wounds and Injuries
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Survivors
Length of Stay
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Injury Severity Score
Mortality
Trauma Centers
Lost to Follow-Up
Intubation
Hypotension
Rupture
Multivariate Analysis
Observation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

The limitations of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in altering the natural history of blunt aortic injury. / Lang, Jennifer L.; Minei, Joseph P.; Modrall, J. Gregory; Clagett, G. Patrick; Valentine, R. James.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 52, No. 2, 08.2010, p. 290-297.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{13be9098f5e3454e8bd24590f00c3261,
title = "The limitations of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in altering the natural history of blunt aortic injury",
abstract = "Background: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is accepted treatment for blunt aortic injury (BAI). We hypothesized that immediate TEVAR would reduce deaths from aortic rupture in patients with BAI. Methods: Review of 81 patients with BAI who arrived alive at a level I trauma center over a 10-year period. Results: Twenty-three patients (28{\%}) died within 4 hours of admission, including 12 who died of aortic rupture. Fifty-eight patients (72{\%}) survived beyond 4 hours, and 8 (14{\%}) ultimately died of associated injuries. Forty patients (69{\%}) underwent aortic repair (30 open repair, 10 TEVAR), and 2 died of multisystem organ failure (MSOF). Comparing open repair to TEVAR, there were no differences in the length of hospital stay (33 ± 27 vs 33 ± 31 days), operative complications (77{\%} vs 70{\%}), or mortality (7{\%} vs 0). Ten patients (17{\%}) with minimal BAI were treated with beta blockade and observation; 4 have not healed their aortic injuries and 6 have been lost to follow-up. Thirty-three of the original 81 study patients (41{\%}) ultimately died. Compared with the patients who died, the survivors were younger (37 vs 48 years; P = .01) and less likely to develop aortic rupture (0 vs 12; P < .001), require intubation in the field (27{\%} vs 49{\%}; P < .05), require cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; 2{\%} vs 30{\%}; P < .001), or arrive hypotensive (17{\%} vs 67{\%}; P < .001). Survivors also had a lower mean injury severity score (34 ± 12 vs 44 ± 12; P < .001), fewer associated injuries (3 ± 1 vs 4 ± 3; P = .02), and a higher prevalence of aortic repair (79{\%} vs 6{\%}; P < .001). Multivariate analysis selected no attempt at aortic repair (odds ratio [OR], 90.9; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 10.6-1000) and hypotension on arrival (OR, 6.1; 95{\%} CI, 1.4-27) as the only independent variables associated with death. Conclusion: Mortality remains high for patients with BAI, but most patients who arrive alive at the hospital do not experience aortic rupture. Rupture occurs within the first 4 hours of admission, often before the injury is recognized in time for salvage with immediate TEVAR. The decision to repair BAI was based on the extent of associated injuries and on the individual surgeon's judgment. Survival was not influenced by the timing of repair, but further studies are needed to compare the outcome of open repair vs TEVAR in patients who survive beyond 4 hours.",
author = "Lang, {Jennifer L.} and Minei, {Joseph P.} and Modrall, {J. Gregory} and Clagett, {G. Patrick} and Valentine, {R. James}",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "290--297",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The limitations of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in altering the natural history of blunt aortic injury

AU - Lang, Jennifer L.

AU - Minei, Joseph P.

AU - Modrall, J. Gregory

AU - Clagett, G. Patrick

AU - Valentine, R. James

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - Background: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is accepted treatment for blunt aortic injury (BAI). We hypothesized that immediate TEVAR would reduce deaths from aortic rupture in patients with BAI. Methods: Review of 81 patients with BAI who arrived alive at a level I trauma center over a 10-year period. Results: Twenty-three patients (28%) died within 4 hours of admission, including 12 who died of aortic rupture. Fifty-eight patients (72%) survived beyond 4 hours, and 8 (14%) ultimately died of associated injuries. Forty patients (69%) underwent aortic repair (30 open repair, 10 TEVAR), and 2 died of multisystem organ failure (MSOF). Comparing open repair to TEVAR, there were no differences in the length of hospital stay (33 ± 27 vs 33 ± 31 days), operative complications (77% vs 70%), or mortality (7% vs 0). Ten patients (17%) with minimal BAI were treated with beta blockade and observation; 4 have not healed their aortic injuries and 6 have been lost to follow-up. Thirty-three of the original 81 study patients (41%) ultimately died. Compared with the patients who died, the survivors were younger (37 vs 48 years; P = .01) and less likely to develop aortic rupture (0 vs 12; P < .001), require intubation in the field (27% vs 49%; P < .05), require cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; 2% vs 30%; P < .001), or arrive hypotensive (17% vs 67%; P < .001). Survivors also had a lower mean injury severity score (34 ± 12 vs 44 ± 12; P < .001), fewer associated injuries (3 ± 1 vs 4 ± 3; P = .02), and a higher prevalence of aortic repair (79% vs 6%; P < .001). Multivariate analysis selected no attempt at aortic repair (odds ratio [OR], 90.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-1000) and hypotension on arrival (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.4-27) as the only independent variables associated with death. Conclusion: Mortality remains high for patients with BAI, but most patients who arrive alive at the hospital do not experience aortic rupture. Rupture occurs within the first 4 hours of admission, often before the injury is recognized in time for salvage with immediate TEVAR. The decision to repair BAI was based on the extent of associated injuries and on the individual surgeon's judgment. Survival was not influenced by the timing of repair, but further studies are needed to compare the outcome of open repair vs TEVAR in patients who survive beyond 4 hours.

AB - Background: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is accepted treatment for blunt aortic injury (BAI). We hypothesized that immediate TEVAR would reduce deaths from aortic rupture in patients with BAI. Methods: Review of 81 patients with BAI who arrived alive at a level I trauma center over a 10-year period. Results: Twenty-three patients (28%) died within 4 hours of admission, including 12 who died of aortic rupture. Fifty-eight patients (72%) survived beyond 4 hours, and 8 (14%) ultimately died of associated injuries. Forty patients (69%) underwent aortic repair (30 open repair, 10 TEVAR), and 2 died of multisystem organ failure (MSOF). Comparing open repair to TEVAR, there were no differences in the length of hospital stay (33 ± 27 vs 33 ± 31 days), operative complications (77% vs 70%), or mortality (7% vs 0). Ten patients (17%) with minimal BAI were treated with beta blockade and observation; 4 have not healed their aortic injuries and 6 have been lost to follow-up. Thirty-three of the original 81 study patients (41%) ultimately died. Compared with the patients who died, the survivors were younger (37 vs 48 years; P = .01) and less likely to develop aortic rupture (0 vs 12; P < .001), require intubation in the field (27% vs 49%; P < .05), require cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; 2% vs 30%; P < .001), or arrive hypotensive (17% vs 67%; P < .001). Survivors also had a lower mean injury severity score (34 ± 12 vs 44 ± 12; P < .001), fewer associated injuries (3 ± 1 vs 4 ± 3; P = .02), and a higher prevalence of aortic repair (79% vs 6%; P < .001). Multivariate analysis selected no attempt at aortic repair (odds ratio [OR], 90.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-1000) and hypotension on arrival (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.4-27) as the only independent variables associated with death. Conclusion: Mortality remains high for patients with BAI, but most patients who arrive alive at the hospital do not experience aortic rupture. Rupture occurs within the first 4 hours of admission, often before the injury is recognized in time for salvage with immediate TEVAR. The decision to repair BAI was based on the extent of associated injuries and on the individual surgeon's judgment. Survival was not influenced by the timing of repair, but further studies are needed to compare the outcome of open repair vs TEVAR in patients who survive beyond 4 hours.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955515105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955515105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 20471772

AN - SCOPUS:77955515105

VL - 52

SP - 290

EP - 297

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 2

ER -