The minimum important difference for the International consultation on incontinence questionnaire - Urinary incontinence short form in women with stress urinary incontinence

Larry T. Sirls, Sharon Tennstedt, Linda Brubaker, Hae Young Kim, Ingrid Nygaard, David D. Rahn, Jonathan Shepherd, Holly E. Richter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Minimum important difference (MID) estimates the minimum degree of change in an instrument's score that correlates with a patient's subjective sense of improvement. We aimed to determine the MID for the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) using both anchor based and distribution based methods derived using data from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS). Materials and Methods Instruments for the anchor-based analyses included the urogenital distress inventory (UDI), incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ), patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I), incontinence episodes (IE) on 7-day bladder diary, and satisfaction with surgical results. After confirming moderate correlation (r ≥ 0.3) of ICIQ-UI SF and each anchor, MIDs were determined by calculating the difference between the mean instrument scores for individuals with the smallest amount of improvement and with no change. The distribution-based method of MID assessment was applied using effect sizes of 0.2 and 0.5 SD (small to medium effects). Triangulation was used to examine these multiple MID values in order to converge on a small range of values. Results Anchor-based MIDs range from -4.5 to -5.7 at 12 months and from -3.1 to 4.3 at 24 months. Distribution-based MID values were lower. Triangulation analysis supports a MID of -5 at 12 months and -4 at 24 months. Conclusion The recommended MIDs for ICIQ-UI SF are -5 at 12 months and -4 at 24 months. In surgical patients, ICIQ-UI SF score changes that meet these thresholds can be considered clinically meaningful. Neurourol. Urodynam. 34:183-187, 2015.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-187
Number of pages5
JournalNeurourology and Urodynamics
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Stress Urinary Incontinence
Urinary Incontinence
Referral and Consultation
Suburethral Slings
Urinary Bladder
Surveys and Questionnaires
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • ICIQ-UI SF
  • midurethral slin
  • minimum important difference
  • quality of life
  • urinary incontinence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Urology

Cite this

The minimum important difference for the International consultation on incontinence questionnaire - Urinary incontinence short form in women with stress urinary incontinence. / Sirls, Larry T.; Tennstedt, Sharon; Brubaker, Linda; Kim, Hae Young; Nygaard, Ingrid; Rahn, David D.; Shepherd, Jonathan; Richter, Holly E.

In: Neurourology and Urodynamics, Vol. 34, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 183-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sirls, Larry T. ; Tennstedt, Sharon ; Brubaker, Linda ; Kim, Hae Young ; Nygaard, Ingrid ; Rahn, David D. ; Shepherd, Jonathan ; Richter, Holly E. / The minimum important difference for the International consultation on incontinence questionnaire - Urinary incontinence short form in women with stress urinary incontinence. In: Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2015 ; Vol. 34, No. 2. pp. 183-187.
@article{6260c463af724815a298566905a74233,
title = "The minimum important difference for the International consultation on incontinence questionnaire - Urinary incontinence short form in women with stress urinary incontinence",
abstract = "Introduction Minimum important difference (MID) estimates the minimum degree of change in an instrument's score that correlates with a patient's subjective sense of improvement. We aimed to determine the MID for the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) using both anchor based and distribution based methods derived using data from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS). Materials and Methods Instruments for the anchor-based analyses included the urogenital distress inventory (UDI), incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ), patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I), incontinence episodes (IE) on 7-day bladder diary, and satisfaction with surgical results. After confirming moderate correlation (r ≥ 0.3) of ICIQ-UI SF and each anchor, MIDs were determined by calculating the difference between the mean instrument scores for individuals with the smallest amount of improvement and with no change. The distribution-based method of MID assessment was applied using effect sizes of 0.2 and 0.5 SD (small to medium effects). Triangulation was used to examine these multiple MID values in order to converge on a small range of values. Results Anchor-based MIDs range from -4.5 to -5.7 at 12 months and from -3.1 to 4.3 at 24 months. Distribution-based MID values were lower. Triangulation analysis supports a MID of -5 at 12 months and -4 at 24 months. Conclusion The recommended MIDs for ICIQ-UI SF are -5 at 12 months and -4 at 24 months. In surgical patients, ICIQ-UI SF score changes that meet these thresholds can be considered clinically meaningful. Neurourol. Urodynam. 34:183-187, 2015.",
keywords = "ICIQ-UI SF, midurethral slin, minimum important difference, quality of life, urinary incontinence",
author = "Sirls, {Larry T.} and Sharon Tennstedt and Linda Brubaker and Kim, {Hae Young} and Ingrid Nygaard and Rahn, {David D.} and Jonathan Shepherd and Richter, {Holly E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/nau.22533",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "183--187",
journal = "Neurourology and Urodynamics",
issn = "0733-2467",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The minimum important difference for the International consultation on incontinence questionnaire - Urinary incontinence short form in women with stress urinary incontinence

AU - Sirls, Larry T.

AU - Tennstedt, Sharon

AU - Brubaker, Linda

AU - Kim, Hae Young

AU - Nygaard, Ingrid

AU - Rahn, David D.

AU - Shepherd, Jonathan

AU - Richter, Holly E.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Introduction Minimum important difference (MID) estimates the minimum degree of change in an instrument's score that correlates with a patient's subjective sense of improvement. We aimed to determine the MID for the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) using both anchor based and distribution based methods derived using data from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS). Materials and Methods Instruments for the anchor-based analyses included the urogenital distress inventory (UDI), incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ), patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I), incontinence episodes (IE) on 7-day bladder diary, and satisfaction with surgical results. After confirming moderate correlation (r ≥ 0.3) of ICIQ-UI SF and each anchor, MIDs were determined by calculating the difference between the mean instrument scores for individuals with the smallest amount of improvement and with no change. The distribution-based method of MID assessment was applied using effect sizes of 0.2 and 0.5 SD (small to medium effects). Triangulation was used to examine these multiple MID values in order to converge on a small range of values. Results Anchor-based MIDs range from -4.5 to -5.7 at 12 months and from -3.1 to 4.3 at 24 months. Distribution-based MID values were lower. Triangulation analysis supports a MID of -5 at 12 months and -4 at 24 months. Conclusion The recommended MIDs for ICIQ-UI SF are -5 at 12 months and -4 at 24 months. In surgical patients, ICIQ-UI SF score changes that meet these thresholds can be considered clinically meaningful. Neurourol. Urodynam. 34:183-187, 2015.

AB - Introduction Minimum important difference (MID) estimates the minimum degree of change in an instrument's score that correlates with a patient's subjective sense of improvement. We aimed to determine the MID for the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) using both anchor based and distribution based methods derived using data from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS). Materials and Methods Instruments for the anchor-based analyses included the urogenital distress inventory (UDI), incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ), patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I), incontinence episodes (IE) on 7-day bladder diary, and satisfaction with surgical results. After confirming moderate correlation (r ≥ 0.3) of ICIQ-UI SF and each anchor, MIDs were determined by calculating the difference between the mean instrument scores for individuals with the smallest amount of improvement and with no change. The distribution-based method of MID assessment was applied using effect sizes of 0.2 and 0.5 SD (small to medium effects). Triangulation was used to examine these multiple MID values in order to converge on a small range of values. Results Anchor-based MIDs range from -4.5 to -5.7 at 12 months and from -3.1 to 4.3 at 24 months. Distribution-based MID values were lower. Triangulation analysis supports a MID of -5 at 12 months and -4 at 24 months. Conclusion The recommended MIDs for ICIQ-UI SF are -5 at 12 months and -4 at 24 months. In surgical patients, ICIQ-UI SF score changes that meet these thresholds can be considered clinically meaningful. Neurourol. Urodynam. 34:183-187, 2015.

KW - ICIQ-UI SF

KW - midurethral slin

KW - minimum important difference

KW - quality of life

KW - urinary incontinence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922728754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922728754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/nau.22533

DO - 10.1002/nau.22533

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 183

EP - 187

JO - Neurourology and Urodynamics

JF - Neurourology and Urodynamics

SN - 0733-2467

IS - 2

ER -