The mixed evidence for brief intervention in emergency departments, trauma care centers, and inpatient hospital settings

What should we do?

Craig A. Field, Janette Baird, Richard Saitz, Raul Caetano, Peter M. Monti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This qualitative review is based on a symposia presented at the 2009 annual conference of the Research Society on Alcoholism (Baird et al., 2009; Field et al., 2009; Monti et al., 2009; Saitz et al., 2009a). The purpose is to describe the mixed evidence supporting brief interventions in the emergency department, trauma care, and in-patient medical care settings; examine potential moderators of treatment outcome in light of the mixed evidence; and identify methods to move the research and practice of brief interventions beyond their current state. Methods: By drawing upon existing reviews and selected individual studies, we provide examples that reflect the current complexity of research in this area and propose steps for advancing the field. Results: Emergency departments, inpatient hospital settings, and trauma care settings represent three unique contexts within which brief interventions have been tested. While the general efficacy of brief alcohol interventions in these settings has been recognized, the evidence is increasingly mixed. Recent studies investigating potential moderators of treatment outcomes suggest that a more sophisticated approach to evaluating the effectiveness of brief interventions across varying patient populations is needed to further understand its effectiveness. Conclusions: Current dissemination efforts represent a significant advance in broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems by providing an evidence-based intervention in health care settings and should not be curtailed. However, additional research is required to enhance treatment outcomes, refine current practice guidelines, and continue to bridge the gap between science and practice. Given the current state of research, a multisetting clinical trial is recommended to account for potential contextual differences while controlling for study design.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2004-2010
Number of pages7
JournalAlcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Volume34
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Trauma Centers
Hospital Emergency Service
Inpatients
Moderators
Health care
Research
Alcohols
Bioelectric potentials
Wounds and Injuries
Practice Guidelines
Patient Care
Clinical Trials
Delivery of Health Care
Population
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Brief Intervention
  • Emergency Departments
  • Inpatient Hospital Settings
  • Review
  • Trauma Centers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Toxicology

Cite this

The mixed evidence for brief intervention in emergency departments, trauma care centers, and inpatient hospital settings : What should we do? / Field, Craig A.; Baird, Janette; Saitz, Richard; Caetano, Raul; Monti, Peter M.

In: Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, Vol. 34, No. 12, 12.2010, p. 2004-2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Field, Craig A. ; Baird, Janette ; Saitz, Richard ; Caetano, Raul ; Monti, Peter M. / The mixed evidence for brief intervention in emergency departments, trauma care centers, and inpatient hospital settings : What should we do?. In: Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2010 ; Vol. 34, No. 12. pp. 2004-2010.
@article{80512aefdd884f4fb91c55f57d28258d,
title = "The mixed evidence for brief intervention in emergency departments, trauma care centers, and inpatient hospital settings: What should we do?",
abstract = "Background: This qualitative review is based on a symposia presented at the 2009 annual conference of the Research Society on Alcoholism (Baird et al., 2009; Field et al., 2009; Monti et al., 2009; Saitz et al., 2009a). The purpose is to describe the mixed evidence supporting brief interventions in the emergency department, trauma care, and in-patient medical care settings; examine potential moderators of treatment outcome in light of the mixed evidence; and identify methods to move the research and practice of brief interventions beyond their current state. Methods: By drawing upon existing reviews and selected individual studies, we provide examples that reflect the current complexity of research in this area and propose steps for advancing the field. Results: Emergency departments, inpatient hospital settings, and trauma care settings represent three unique contexts within which brief interventions have been tested. While the general efficacy of brief alcohol interventions in these settings has been recognized, the evidence is increasingly mixed. Recent studies investigating potential moderators of treatment outcomes suggest that a more sophisticated approach to evaluating the effectiveness of brief interventions across varying patient populations is needed to further understand its effectiveness. Conclusions: Current dissemination efforts represent a significant advance in broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems by providing an evidence-based intervention in health care settings and should not be curtailed. However, additional research is required to enhance treatment outcomes, refine current practice guidelines, and continue to bridge the gap between science and practice. Given the current state of research, a multisetting clinical trial is recommended to account for potential contextual differences while controlling for study design.",
keywords = "Brief Intervention, Emergency Departments, Inpatient Hospital Settings, Review, Trauma Centers",
author = "Field, {Craig A.} and Janette Baird and Richard Saitz and Raul Caetano and Monti, {Peter M.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01297.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "2004--2010",
journal = "Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research",
issn = "0145-6008",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The mixed evidence for brief intervention in emergency departments, trauma care centers, and inpatient hospital settings

T2 - What should we do?

AU - Field, Craig A.

AU - Baird, Janette

AU - Saitz, Richard

AU - Caetano, Raul

AU - Monti, Peter M.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Background: This qualitative review is based on a symposia presented at the 2009 annual conference of the Research Society on Alcoholism (Baird et al., 2009; Field et al., 2009; Monti et al., 2009; Saitz et al., 2009a). The purpose is to describe the mixed evidence supporting brief interventions in the emergency department, trauma care, and in-patient medical care settings; examine potential moderators of treatment outcome in light of the mixed evidence; and identify methods to move the research and practice of brief interventions beyond their current state. Methods: By drawing upon existing reviews and selected individual studies, we provide examples that reflect the current complexity of research in this area and propose steps for advancing the field. Results: Emergency departments, inpatient hospital settings, and trauma care settings represent three unique contexts within which brief interventions have been tested. While the general efficacy of brief alcohol interventions in these settings has been recognized, the evidence is increasingly mixed. Recent studies investigating potential moderators of treatment outcomes suggest that a more sophisticated approach to evaluating the effectiveness of brief interventions across varying patient populations is needed to further understand its effectiveness. Conclusions: Current dissemination efforts represent a significant advance in broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems by providing an evidence-based intervention in health care settings and should not be curtailed. However, additional research is required to enhance treatment outcomes, refine current practice guidelines, and continue to bridge the gap between science and practice. Given the current state of research, a multisetting clinical trial is recommended to account for potential contextual differences while controlling for study design.

AB - Background: This qualitative review is based on a symposia presented at the 2009 annual conference of the Research Society on Alcoholism (Baird et al., 2009; Field et al., 2009; Monti et al., 2009; Saitz et al., 2009a). The purpose is to describe the mixed evidence supporting brief interventions in the emergency department, trauma care, and in-patient medical care settings; examine potential moderators of treatment outcome in light of the mixed evidence; and identify methods to move the research and practice of brief interventions beyond their current state. Methods: By drawing upon existing reviews and selected individual studies, we provide examples that reflect the current complexity of research in this area and propose steps for advancing the field. Results: Emergency departments, inpatient hospital settings, and trauma care settings represent three unique contexts within which brief interventions have been tested. While the general efficacy of brief alcohol interventions in these settings has been recognized, the evidence is increasingly mixed. Recent studies investigating potential moderators of treatment outcomes suggest that a more sophisticated approach to evaluating the effectiveness of brief interventions across varying patient populations is needed to further understand its effectiveness. Conclusions: Current dissemination efforts represent a significant advance in broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems by providing an evidence-based intervention in health care settings and should not be curtailed. However, additional research is required to enhance treatment outcomes, refine current practice guidelines, and continue to bridge the gap between science and practice. Given the current state of research, a multisetting clinical trial is recommended to account for potential contextual differences while controlling for study design.

KW - Brief Intervention

KW - Emergency Departments

KW - Inpatient Hospital Settings

KW - Review

KW - Trauma Centers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649574290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649574290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01297.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01297.x

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 2004

EP - 2010

JO - Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

JF - Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

SN - 0145-6008

IS - 12

ER -