The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions

J. Deng, T. Pawlicki, Y. Chen, J. Li, S. B. Jiang, C. M. Ma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We have investigated the tongue-and-groove effect on the IMRT dose distributions for a Varian MLC. We have compared the dose distributions calculated using the intensity maps with and without the tongue-and-groove effect. Our results showed that, for one intensity-modulated treatment field, the maximum tongue-and-groove effect could be up to 10% of the maximum dose in the dose distributions. For an IMRT treatment with multiple gantry angles (≥5), the difference between the dose distributions with and without the tongue-and-groove effect was hardly visible, less than 1.6% for the two typical clinical cases studied. After considering the patient setup errors, the dose distributions were smoothed with reduced and insignificant differences between plans with and without the tongue-and-groove effect. Therefore, for a multiple-field IMRT plan (≥5), the tongue-and-groove effect on the IMRT dose distributions will be generally clinically insignificant due to the smearing effect of individual fields. The tongue-and-groove effect on an IMRT plan with small number of fields (>5) will vary depending on the number of fields in a plan (coplanar or non-coplanar), the MLC leaf sequences and the patient setup uncertainty, and may be significant (>5% of maximum dose) in some cases, especially when the patient setup uncertainty is small (≤2 mm).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1039-1060
Number of pages22
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

tongue
Tongue
grooves
dosage
Uncertainty
gantry cranes
leaves
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions. / Deng, J.; Pawlicki, T.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Jiang, S. B.; Ma, C. M.

In: Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2001, p. 1039-1060.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deng, J. ; Pawlicki, T. ; Chen, Y. ; Li, J. ; Jiang, S. B. ; Ma, C. M. / The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions. In: Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2001 ; Vol. 46, No. 4. pp. 1039-1060.
@article{876a9844a96b4e9fabd71ff4393d4263,
title = "The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions",
abstract = "We have investigated the tongue-and-groove effect on the IMRT dose distributions for a Varian MLC. We have compared the dose distributions calculated using the intensity maps with and without the tongue-and-groove effect. Our results showed that, for one intensity-modulated treatment field, the maximum tongue-and-groove effect could be up to 10{\%} of the maximum dose in the dose distributions. For an IMRT treatment with multiple gantry angles (≥5), the difference between the dose distributions with and without the tongue-and-groove effect was hardly visible, less than 1.6{\%} for the two typical clinical cases studied. After considering the patient setup errors, the dose distributions were smoothed with reduced and insignificant differences between plans with and without the tongue-and-groove effect. Therefore, for a multiple-field IMRT plan (≥5), the tongue-and-groove effect on the IMRT dose distributions will be generally clinically insignificant due to the smearing effect of individual fields. The tongue-and-groove effect on an IMRT plan with small number of fields (>5) will vary depending on the number of fields in a plan (coplanar or non-coplanar), the MLC leaf sequences and the patient setup uncertainty, and may be significant (>5{\%} of maximum dose) in some cases, especially when the patient setup uncertainty is small (≤2 mm).",
author = "J. Deng and T. Pawlicki and Y. Chen and J. Li and Jiang, {S. B.} and Ma, {C. M.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1088/0031-9155/46/4/310",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "1039--1060",
journal = "Physics in Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0031-9155",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions

AU - Deng, J.

AU - Pawlicki, T.

AU - Chen, Y.

AU - Li, J.

AU - Jiang, S. B.

AU - Ma, C. M.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - We have investigated the tongue-and-groove effect on the IMRT dose distributions for a Varian MLC. We have compared the dose distributions calculated using the intensity maps with and without the tongue-and-groove effect. Our results showed that, for one intensity-modulated treatment field, the maximum tongue-and-groove effect could be up to 10% of the maximum dose in the dose distributions. For an IMRT treatment with multiple gantry angles (≥5), the difference between the dose distributions with and without the tongue-and-groove effect was hardly visible, less than 1.6% for the two typical clinical cases studied. After considering the patient setup errors, the dose distributions were smoothed with reduced and insignificant differences between plans with and without the tongue-and-groove effect. Therefore, for a multiple-field IMRT plan (≥5), the tongue-and-groove effect on the IMRT dose distributions will be generally clinically insignificant due to the smearing effect of individual fields. The tongue-and-groove effect on an IMRT plan with small number of fields (>5) will vary depending on the number of fields in a plan (coplanar or non-coplanar), the MLC leaf sequences and the patient setup uncertainty, and may be significant (>5% of maximum dose) in some cases, especially when the patient setup uncertainty is small (≤2 mm).

AB - We have investigated the tongue-and-groove effect on the IMRT dose distributions for a Varian MLC. We have compared the dose distributions calculated using the intensity maps with and without the tongue-and-groove effect. Our results showed that, for one intensity-modulated treatment field, the maximum tongue-and-groove effect could be up to 10% of the maximum dose in the dose distributions. For an IMRT treatment with multiple gantry angles (≥5), the difference between the dose distributions with and without the tongue-and-groove effect was hardly visible, less than 1.6% for the two typical clinical cases studied. After considering the patient setup errors, the dose distributions were smoothed with reduced and insignificant differences between plans with and without the tongue-and-groove effect. Therefore, for a multiple-field IMRT plan (≥5), the tongue-and-groove effect on the IMRT dose distributions will be generally clinically insignificant due to the smearing effect of individual fields. The tongue-and-groove effect on an IMRT plan with small number of fields (>5) will vary depending on the number of fields in a plan (coplanar or non-coplanar), the MLC leaf sequences and the patient setup uncertainty, and may be significant (>5% of maximum dose) in some cases, especially when the patient setup uncertainty is small (≤2 mm).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035055467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035055467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0031-9155/46/4/310

DO - 10.1088/0031-9155/46/4/310

M3 - Article

C2 - 11324950

AN - SCOPUS:0035055467

VL - 46

SP - 1039

EP - 1060

JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology

JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0031-9155

IS - 4

ER -