The neurogenesis hypothesis of affective and anxiety disorders

Are we mistaking the scaffolding for the building?

David Petrik, Diane C. Lagace, Amelia J. Eisch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

145 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypotheses are scaffoldings erected in front of a building and then dismantled when the building is finished. They are indispensable for the workman; but you mustn't mistake the scaffolding for the building. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. The neurogenesis hypothesis of affective disorders - in its simplest form - postulates that the generation of neurons in the postnatal hippocampal dentate gyrus is involved in the etiology and treatment efficacy of major depressive disorder (MDD). The hypothesis was established in the 1990s but was built on a broad foundation of earlier research on the hippocampus, serotonin and MDD. It has gone through several growth phases fueled by discoveries both correlative and causative in nature. Recently, the hypothesis has also been broadened to also include potential relevance for anxiety disorders, like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). As any hypothesis should be, it has been tested and challenged, sometimes vigorously. Here we review the current standing of the neurogenesis hypothesis of affective and anxiety disorders, noting in particular how a central postulate - that decreased neurogenesis results in depression or anxiety - has, in general, been rejected. We also review the controversies on whether treatments for these disorders, like antidepressants, rely on intact neurogenesis for their efficacy, and the existence of neurogenesis-dependent and -independent effects of antidepressants. In addition, we review the implications that the hypothesis has for the response to stress, PTSD, and the neurobiology of resilience, and highlight our own work showing that adult-generated neurons are functionally important for the behavioral response to social stress. We conclude by emphasizing how advancements in transgenic mouse technology, rodent behavioral analyses, and our understanding of the neurogenesis process will allow us to refine our conclusions and perform ever more specific experiments. Such scrutiny is critical, since if we "mistake the scaffolding for the building" we could overlook opportunities for translational impact in the clinic. This article is part of a special Issue entitled 'Anxiety and Depression'.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-34
Number of pages14
JournalNeuropharmacology
Volume62
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Neurogenesis
Anxiety Disorders
Mood Disorders
Major Depressive Disorder
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Antidepressive Agents
Anxiety
Depression
Neurons
Parahippocampal Gyrus
Neurobiology
Dentate Gyrus
Transgenic Mice
Rodentia
Hippocampus
Serotonin
Technology
Growth
Research

Keywords

  • Adult neurogenesis
  • Anxiety
  • Dentate gyrus
  • Depression
  • Hippocampus
  • Post-traumatic stress disorder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

The neurogenesis hypothesis of affective and anxiety disorders : Are we mistaking the scaffolding for the building? / Petrik, David; Lagace, Diane C.; Eisch, Amelia J.

In: Neuropharmacology, Vol. 62, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 21-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{55de67d3a5284b43982733e3b5b316cb,
title = "The neurogenesis hypothesis of affective and anxiety disorders: Are we mistaking the scaffolding for the building?",
abstract = "Hypotheses are scaffoldings erected in front of a building and then dismantled when the building is finished. They are indispensable for the workman; but you mustn't mistake the scaffolding for the building. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. The neurogenesis hypothesis of affective disorders - in its simplest form - postulates that the generation of neurons in the postnatal hippocampal dentate gyrus is involved in the etiology and treatment efficacy of major depressive disorder (MDD). The hypothesis was established in the 1990s but was built on a broad foundation of earlier research on the hippocampus, serotonin and MDD. It has gone through several growth phases fueled by discoveries both correlative and causative in nature. Recently, the hypothesis has also been broadened to also include potential relevance for anxiety disorders, like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). As any hypothesis should be, it has been tested and challenged, sometimes vigorously. Here we review the current standing of the neurogenesis hypothesis of affective and anxiety disorders, noting in particular how a central postulate - that decreased neurogenesis results in depression or anxiety - has, in general, been rejected. We also review the controversies on whether treatments for these disorders, like antidepressants, rely on intact neurogenesis for their efficacy, and the existence of neurogenesis-dependent and -independent effects of antidepressants. In addition, we review the implications that the hypothesis has for the response to stress, PTSD, and the neurobiology of resilience, and highlight our own work showing that adult-generated neurons are functionally important for the behavioral response to social stress. We conclude by emphasizing how advancements in transgenic mouse technology, rodent behavioral analyses, and our understanding of the neurogenesis process will allow us to refine our conclusions and perform ever more specific experiments. Such scrutiny is critical, since if we {"}mistake the scaffolding for the building{"} we could overlook opportunities for translational impact in the clinic. This article is part of a special Issue entitled 'Anxiety and Depression'.",
keywords = "Adult neurogenesis, Anxiety, Dentate gyrus, Depression, Hippocampus, Post-traumatic stress disorder",
author = "David Petrik and Lagace, {Diane C.} and Eisch, {Amelia J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.09.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "21--34",
journal = "Neuropharmacology",
issn = "0028-3908",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The neurogenesis hypothesis of affective and anxiety disorders

T2 - Are we mistaking the scaffolding for the building?

AU - Petrik, David

AU - Lagace, Diane C.

AU - Eisch, Amelia J.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Hypotheses are scaffoldings erected in front of a building and then dismantled when the building is finished. They are indispensable for the workman; but you mustn't mistake the scaffolding for the building. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. The neurogenesis hypothesis of affective disorders - in its simplest form - postulates that the generation of neurons in the postnatal hippocampal dentate gyrus is involved in the etiology and treatment efficacy of major depressive disorder (MDD). The hypothesis was established in the 1990s but was built on a broad foundation of earlier research on the hippocampus, serotonin and MDD. It has gone through several growth phases fueled by discoveries both correlative and causative in nature. Recently, the hypothesis has also been broadened to also include potential relevance for anxiety disorders, like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). As any hypothesis should be, it has been tested and challenged, sometimes vigorously. Here we review the current standing of the neurogenesis hypothesis of affective and anxiety disorders, noting in particular how a central postulate - that decreased neurogenesis results in depression or anxiety - has, in general, been rejected. We also review the controversies on whether treatments for these disorders, like antidepressants, rely on intact neurogenesis for their efficacy, and the existence of neurogenesis-dependent and -independent effects of antidepressants. In addition, we review the implications that the hypothesis has for the response to stress, PTSD, and the neurobiology of resilience, and highlight our own work showing that adult-generated neurons are functionally important for the behavioral response to social stress. We conclude by emphasizing how advancements in transgenic mouse technology, rodent behavioral analyses, and our understanding of the neurogenesis process will allow us to refine our conclusions and perform ever more specific experiments. Such scrutiny is critical, since if we "mistake the scaffolding for the building" we could overlook opportunities for translational impact in the clinic. This article is part of a special Issue entitled 'Anxiety and Depression'.

AB - Hypotheses are scaffoldings erected in front of a building and then dismantled when the building is finished. They are indispensable for the workman; but you mustn't mistake the scaffolding for the building. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. The neurogenesis hypothesis of affective disorders - in its simplest form - postulates that the generation of neurons in the postnatal hippocampal dentate gyrus is involved in the etiology and treatment efficacy of major depressive disorder (MDD). The hypothesis was established in the 1990s but was built on a broad foundation of earlier research on the hippocampus, serotonin and MDD. It has gone through several growth phases fueled by discoveries both correlative and causative in nature. Recently, the hypothesis has also been broadened to also include potential relevance for anxiety disorders, like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). As any hypothesis should be, it has been tested and challenged, sometimes vigorously. Here we review the current standing of the neurogenesis hypothesis of affective and anxiety disorders, noting in particular how a central postulate - that decreased neurogenesis results in depression or anxiety - has, in general, been rejected. We also review the controversies on whether treatments for these disorders, like antidepressants, rely on intact neurogenesis for their efficacy, and the existence of neurogenesis-dependent and -independent effects of antidepressants. In addition, we review the implications that the hypothesis has for the response to stress, PTSD, and the neurobiology of resilience, and highlight our own work showing that adult-generated neurons are functionally important for the behavioral response to social stress. We conclude by emphasizing how advancements in transgenic mouse technology, rodent behavioral analyses, and our understanding of the neurogenesis process will allow us to refine our conclusions and perform ever more specific experiments. Such scrutiny is critical, since if we "mistake the scaffolding for the building" we could overlook opportunities for translational impact in the clinic. This article is part of a special Issue entitled 'Anxiety and Depression'.

KW - Adult neurogenesis

KW - Anxiety

KW - Dentate gyrus

KW - Depression

KW - Hippocampus

KW - Post-traumatic stress disorder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054118405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054118405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.09.003

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 21

EP - 34

JO - Neuropharmacology

JF - Neuropharmacology

SN - 0028-3908

IS - 1

ER -