The process of breast augmentation: Four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Background: Breast augmentation has been an integral part of plastic surgeons' practices for over 40 years. Although devices have evolved, patient outcomes are still not ideal, as documented in multiple premarket approval clinical trials. Unlike many other areas of surgery, the practice of breast augmentation has suffered from the lack of a defined process for patient management. The purpose of this study was to clinically define and evaluate the process of breast augmentation and analyze patient outcomes using these practices compared with existing premarket approval trial data. Methods: Three hundred consecutive primary breast augmentations from 2001 to 2005 were followed prospectively. Each patient underwent a defined process of breast augmentation including structured patient education and informed consent; tissue-based preoperative planning consultation; refined surgical technique; and structured postoperative instructions, management, and follow-up. Results: The mean follow-up was 2.1 years. The most common complications were rippling and palpability, soft-tissue stretch, and hypersensitivity. The overall reoperation rate was 3.7 percent for the entire group and 4.7 percent and 2.9 percent for saline and form-stable cohesive gel implants, respectively. Conclusions: Optimizing patient outcomes in breast augmentation requires defining the overall process to allow for enhanced patient outcomes. This is the first report that defines and integrates the entire process comprehensively that is validated by outcomes data. This process is transferable to other surgeons and, using this algorithm, patient outcomes in this study were superior to premarket approval clinical trial data. In summary, approaching this procedure with a global process produces superior patient outcomes in breast augmentation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPlastic Surgery Complete
Subtitle of host publicationThe Clinical Masters of PRS- Breast Augmentation
PublisherWolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP)
Pages66-74
Number of pages9
ISBN (Print)9781496304889
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 11 2015

Fingerprint

Breast
Clinical Trials
Patient Education
Informed Consent
Reoperation
Hypersensitivity
Referral and Consultation
Gels
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Adams, W. P. (2015). The process of breast augmentation: Four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. In Plastic Surgery Complete: The Clinical Masters of PRS- Breast Augmentation (pp. 66-74). Wolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP). https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318250891f

The process of breast augmentation : Four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. / Adams, William P.

Plastic Surgery Complete: The Clinical Masters of PRS- Breast Augmentation. Wolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP), 2015. p. 66-74.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Adams, WP 2015, The process of breast augmentation: Four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. in Plastic Surgery Complete: The Clinical Masters of PRS- Breast Augmentation. Wolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP), pp. 66-74. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318250891f
Adams WP. The process of breast augmentation: Four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. In Plastic Surgery Complete: The Clinical Masters of PRS- Breast Augmentation. Wolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP). 2015. p. 66-74 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318250891f
Adams, William P. / The process of breast augmentation : Four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. Plastic Surgery Complete: The Clinical Masters of PRS- Breast Augmentation. Wolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP), 2015. pp. 66-74
@inbook{50c94caabda34e4e8f7ae0797fa86c2a,
title = "The process of breast augmentation: Four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients",
abstract = "Background: Breast augmentation has been an integral part of plastic surgeons' practices for over 40 years. Although devices have evolved, patient outcomes are still not ideal, as documented in multiple premarket approval clinical trials. Unlike many other areas of surgery, the practice of breast augmentation has suffered from the lack of a defined process for patient management. The purpose of this study was to clinically define and evaluate the process of breast augmentation and analyze patient outcomes using these practices compared with existing premarket approval trial data. Methods: Three hundred consecutive primary breast augmentations from 2001 to 2005 were followed prospectively. Each patient underwent a defined process of breast augmentation including structured patient education and informed consent; tissue-based preoperative planning consultation; refined surgical technique; and structured postoperative instructions, management, and follow-up. Results: The mean follow-up was 2.1 years. The most common complications were rippling and palpability, soft-tissue stretch, and hypersensitivity. The overall reoperation rate was 3.7 percent for the entire group and 4.7 percent and 2.9 percent for saline and form-stable cohesive gel implants, respectively. Conclusions: Optimizing patient outcomes in breast augmentation requires defining the overall process to allow for enhanced patient outcomes. This is the first report that defines and integrates the entire process comprehensively that is validated by outcomes data. This process is transferable to other surgeons and, using this algorithm, patient outcomes in this study were superior to premarket approval clinical trial data. In summary, approaching this procedure with a global process produces superior patient outcomes in breast augmentation.",
author = "Adams, {William P.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0b013e318250891f",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781496304889",
pages = "66--74",
booktitle = "Plastic Surgery Complete",
publisher = "Wolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP)",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The process of breast augmentation

T2 - Four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients

AU - Adams, William P.

PY - 2015/2/11

Y1 - 2015/2/11

N2 - Background: Breast augmentation has been an integral part of plastic surgeons' practices for over 40 years. Although devices have evolved, patient outcomes are still not ideal, as documented in multiple premarket approval clinical trials. Unlike many other areas of surgery, the practice of breast augmentation has suffered from the lack of a defined process for patient management. The purpose of this study was to clinically define and evaluate the process of breast augmentation and analyze patient outcomes using these practices compared with existing premarket approval trial data. Methods: Three hundred consecutive primary breast augmentations from 2001 to 2005 were followed prospectively. Each patient underwent a defined process of breast augmentation including structured patient education and informed consent; tissue-based preoperative planning consultation; refined surgical technique; and structured postoperative instructions, management, and follow-up. Results: The mean follow-up was 2.1 years. The most common complications were rippling and palpability, soft-tissue stretch, and hypersensitivity. The overall reoperation rate was 3.7 percent for the entire group and 4.7 percent and 2.9 percent for saline and form-stable cohesive gel implants, respectively. Conclusions: Optimizing patient outcomes in breast augmentation requires defining the overall process to allow for enhanced patient outcomes. This is the first report that defines and integrates the entire process comprehensively that is validated by outcomes data. This process is transferable to other surgeons and, using this algorithm, patient outcomes in this study were superior to premarket approval clinical trial data. In summary, approaching this procedure with a global process produces superior patient outcomes in breast augmentation.

AB - Background: Breast augmentation has been an integral part of plastic surgeons' practices for over 40 years. Although devices have evolved, patient outcomes are still not ideal, as documented in multiple premarket approval clinical trials. Unlike many other areas of surgery, the practice of breast augmentation has suffered from the lack of a defined process for patient management. The purpose of this study was to clinically define and evaluate the process of breast augmentation and analyze patient outcomes using these practices compared with existing premarket approval trial data. Methods: Three hundred consecutive primary breast augmentations from 2001 to 2005 were followed prospectively. Each patient underwent a defined process of breast augmentation including structured patient education and informed consent; tissue-based preoperative planning consultation; refined surgical technique; and structured postoperative instructions, management, and follow-up. Results: The mean follow-up was 2.1 years. The most common complications were rippling and palpability, soft-tissue stretch, and hypersensitivity. The overall reoperation rate was 3.7 percent for the entire group and 4.7 percent and 2.9 percent for saline and form-stable cohesive gel implants, respectively. Conclusions: Optimizing patient outcomes in breast augmentation requires defining the overall process to allow for enhanced patient outcomes. This is the first report that defines and integrates the entire process comprehensively that is validated by outcomes data. This process is transferable to other surgeons and, using this algorithm, patient outcomes in this study were superior to premarket approval clinical trial data. In summary, approaching this procedure with a global process produces superior patient outcomes in breast augmentation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975090297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975090297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318250891f

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318250891f

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84975090297

SN - 9781496304889

SP - 66

EP - 74

BT - Plastic Surgery Complete

PB - Wolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP)

ER -