The prophylactic placement of hemoclips to prevent delayed post-polypectomy bleeding: An unnecessary practice? A case control study

Linda A. Feagins, Anh D. Nguyen, Ramiz Iqbal, Stuart J. Spechler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: With the recent, widespread availability of endoscopic hemoclips, it has become common clinical practice to apply hemoclips to some non-bleeding polypectomy sites "prophylactically" to prevent delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB). Few published data support this practice, however. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare rates of delayed PPB in matched patients who had polypectomies performed with and without the prophylactic placement of hemoclips. Methods: We reviewed medical records of patients who had elective colonoscopy at our VA Medical Center between July 2008 and December 2009. We identified patients who had hemoclips applied prophylactically (cases) and compared their rate of delayed PPB within 30 days to that of patients who had polypectomy without hemoclipping (controls). Controls were matched 1:1 to cases based on age and on factors known to contribute to the risk of PPB including polyp size, morphology, technique of polyp removal, number of polyps removed, and use of anticoagulants. Results: We identified 184 patients (cases) who underwent prophylactic hemoclipping and 184 well-matched controls. An average of 3.8 polyps per patient were removed in the case group compared to 3.3 polyps per patient in controls (p = 0.6). Delayed PPB occurred in three patients in the prophylactic hemoclip group and in one patient in the control group (1.6 vs. 0.5 %, p = 0.62). Conclusions: We found no significant difference in the rate of delayed PPB between patients who had prophylactic hemoclipping of polypectomy sites and a well-matched control group of patients who had polypectomy without prophylactic hemoclipping. These data call into question the expensive practice of prophylactic hemoclipping.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)823-828
Number of pages6
JournalDigestive Diseases and Sciences
Volume59
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Case-Control Studies
Hemorrhage
Polyps
Control Groups
Age Factors
Colonoscopy
Anticoagulants
Medical Records
Research Design

Keywords

  • Colonoscopy
  • Delayed bleeding
  • Polypectomy
  • Prophylactic clipping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Physiology

Cite this

The prophylactic placement of hemoclips to prevent delayed post-polypectomy bleeding : An unnecessary practice? A case control study. / Feagins, Linda A.; Nguyen, Anh D.; Iqbal, Ramiz; Spechler, Stuart J.

In: Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Vol. 59, No. 4, 2014, p. 823-828.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{db9fe945009b4abe80904b83db0832df,
title = "The prophylactic placement of hemoclips to prevent delayed post-polypectomy bleeding: An unnecessary practice? A case control study",
abstract = "Background: With the recent, widespread availability of endoscopic hemoclips, it has become common clinical practice to apply hemoclips to some non-bleeding polypectomy sites {"}prophylactically{"} to prevent delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB). Few published data support this practice, however. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare rates of delayed PPB in matched patients who had polypectomies performed with and without the prophylactic placement of hemoclips. Methods: We reviewed medical records of patients who had elective colonoscopy at our VA Medical Center between July 2008 and December 2009. We identified patients who had hemoclips applied prophylactically (cases) and compared their rate of delayed PPB within 30 days to that of patients who had polypectomy without hemoclipping (controls). Controls were matched 1:1 to cases based on age and on factors known to contribute to the risk of PPB including polyp size, morphology, technique of polyp removal, number of polyps removed, and use of anticoagulants. Results: We identified 184 patients (cases) who underwent prophylactic hemoclipping and 184 well-matched controls. An average of 3.8 polyps per patient were removed in the case group compared to 3.3 polyps per patient in controls (p = 0.6). Delayed PPB occurred in three patients in the prophylactic hemoclip group and in one patient in the control group (1.6 vs. 0.5 {\%}, p = 0.62). Conclusions: We found no significant difference in the rate of delayed PPB between patients who had prophylactic hemoclipping of polypectomy sites and a well-matched control group of patients who had polypectomy without prophylactic hemoclipping. These data call into question the expensive practice of prophylactic hemoclipping.",
keywords = "Colonoscopy, Delayed bleeding, Polypectomy, Prophylactic clipping",
author = "Feagins, {Linda A.} and Nguyen, {Anh D.} and Ramiz Iqbal and Spechler, {Stuart J.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10620-014-3055-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "823--828",
journal = "Digestive Diseases and Sciences",
issn = "0163-2116",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The prophylactic placement of hemoclips to prevent delayed post-polypectomy bleeding

T2 - An unnecessary practice? A case control study

AU - Feagins, Linda A.

AU - Nguyen, Anh D.

AU - Iqbal, Ramiz

AU - Spechler, Stuart J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: With the recent, widespread availability of endoscopic hemoclips, it has become common clinical practice to apply hemoclips to some non-bleeding polypectomy sites "prophylactically" to prevent delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB). Few published data support this practice, however. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare rates of delayed PPB in matched patients who had polypectomies performed with and without the prophylactic placement of hemoclips. Methods: We reviewed medical records of patients who had elective colonoscopy at our VA Medical Center between July 2008 and December 2009. We identified patients who had hemoclips applied prophylactically (cases) and compared their rate of delayed PPB within 30 days to that of patients who had polypectomy without hemoclipping (controls). Controls were matched 1:1 to cases based on age and on factors known to contribute to the risk of PPB including polyp size, morphology, technique of polyp removal, number of polyps removed, and use of anticoagulants. Results: We identified 184 patients (cases) who underwent prophylactic hemoclipping and 184 well-matched controls. An average of 3.8 polyps per patient were removed in the case group compared to 3.3 polyps per patient in controls (p = 0.6). Delayed PPB occurred in three patients in the prophylactic hemoclip group and in one patient in the control group (1.6 vs. 0.5 %, p = 0.62). Conclusions: We found no significant difference in the rate of delayed PPB between patients who had prophylactic hemoclipping of polypectomy sites and a well-matched control group of patients who had polypectomy without prophylactic hemoclipping. These data call into question the expensive practice of prophylactic hemoclipping.

AB - Background: With the recent, widespread availability of endoscopic hemoclips, it has become common clinical practice to apply hemoclips to some non-bleeding polypectomy sites "prophylactically" to prevent delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB). Few published data support this practice, however. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare rates of delayed PPB in matched patients who had polypectomies performed with and without the prophylactic placement of hemoclips. Methods: We reviewed medical records of patients who had elective colonoscopy at our VA Medical Center between July 2008 and December 2009. We identified patients who had hemoclips applied prophylactically (cases) and compared their rate of delayed PPB within 30 days to that of patients who had polypectomy without hemoclipping (controls). Controls were matched 1:1 to cases based on age and on factors known to contribute to the risk of PPB including polyp size, morphology, technique of polyp removal, number of polyps removed, and use of anticoagulants. Results: We identified 184 patients (cases) who underwent prophylactic hemoclipping and 184 well-matched controls. An average of 3.8 polyps per patient were removed in the case group compared to 3.3 polyps per patient in controls (p = 0.6). Delayed PPB occurred in three patients in the prophylactic hemoclip group and in one patient in the control group (1.6 vs. 0.5 %, p = 0.62). Conclusions: We found no significant difference in the rate of delayed PPB between patients who had prophylactic hemoclipping of polypectomy sites and a well-matched control group of patients who had polypectomy without prophylactic hemoclipping. These data call into question the expensive practice of prophylactic hemoclipping.

KW - Colonoscopy

KW - Delayed bleeding

KW - Polypectomy

KW - Prophylactic clipping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897386324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897386324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10620-014-3055-0

DO - 10.1007/s10620-014-3055-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 24526499

AN - SCOPUS:84897386324

VL - 59

SP - 823

EP - 828

JO - Digestive Diseases and Sciences

JF - Digestive Diseases and Sciences

SN - 0163-2116

IS - 4

ER -