The Pros and Cons of Mendelian Randomization Studies to Evaluate Emerging Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Jainy Savla, Ian J. Neeland

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Mendelian randomization (MR) is a technique that uses natural genetic variation to assess the potential causal role of a modifiable risk factor on cardiovascular disease. Advances have led to the identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms linked with risk factors that act as naturally randomized instruments to investigate the risk factor-disease relationship. Recent Findings: There are several pros and cons when using MR. It can address many limitations of observational study design including confounding, reverse causation, and demonstration of causality when a randomized controlled trial is not practical or feasible. However, several limitations do exist and include pleiotropy (multiple downstream effects of a single genetic variant), linkage disequilibrium (non-random association of genetic variation), and imprecise estimates of causal effects. Summary: MR is an important tool in cardiovascular research and has been applied to assess cardiovascular risk factors including obesity and atrial fibrillation. While these studies provide insight into disease causation, understanding the strengths and limitations of the technique is important for appropriate interpretation of results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2
JournalCurrent Cardiovascular Risk Reports
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Random Allocation
Causality
Genetic Linkage
Linkage Disequilibrium
Atrial Fibrillation
Observational Studies
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
Cardiovascular Diseases
Randomized Controlled Trials
Obesity
Research

Keywords

  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Cardiovascular risk factors
  • Genetic variants
  • Mendelian randomization
  • Observational study design
  • Randomized controlled trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

The Pros and Cons of Mendelian Randomization Studies to Evaluate Emerging Cardiovascular Risk Factors. / Savla, Jainy; Neeland, Ian J.

In: Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{431b94eb96b74407ab2be80a4d6101b5,
title = "The Pros and Cons of Mendelian Randomization Studies to Evaluate Emerging Cardiovascular Risk Factors",
abstract = "Purpose of Review: Mendelian randomization (MR) is a technique that uses natural genetic variation to assess the potential causal role of a modifiable risk factor on cardiovascular disease. Advances have led to the identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms linked with risk factors that act as naturally randomized instruments to investigate the risk factor-disease relationship. Recent Findings: There are several pros and cons when using MR. It can address many limitations of observational study design including confounding, reverse causation, and demonstration of causality when a randomized controlled trial is not practical or feasible. However, several limitations do exist and include pleiotropy (multiple downstream effects of a single genetic variant), linkage disequilibrium (non-random association of genetic variation), and imprecise estimates of causal effects. Summary: MR is an important tool in cardiovascular research and has been applied to assess cardiovascular risk factors including obesity and atrial fibrillation. While these studies provide insight into disease causation, understanding the strengths and limitations of the technique is important for appropriate interpretation of results.",
keywords = "Cardiovascular disease, Cardiovascular risk factors, Genetic variants, Mendelian randomization, Observational study design, Randomized controlled trials",
author = "Jainy Savla and Neeland, {Ian J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12170-018-0566-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports",
issn = "1932-9520",
publisher = "Current Medicine Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Pros and Cons of Mendelian Randomization Studies to Evaluate Emerging Cardiovascular Risk Factors

AU - Savla, Jainy

AU - Neeland, Ian J.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose of Review: Mendelian randomization (MR) is a technique that uses natural genetic variation to assess the potential causal role of a modifiable risk factor on cardiovascular disease. Advances have led to the identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms linked with risk factors that act as naturally randomized instruments to investigate the risk factor-disease relationship. Recent Findings: There are several pros and cons when using MR. It can address many limitations of observational study design including confounding, reverse causation, and demonstration of causality when a randomized controlled trial is not practical or feasible. However, several limitations do exist and include pleiotropy (multiple downstream effects of a single genetic variant), linkage disequilibrium (non-random association of genetic variation), and imprecise estimates of causal effects. Summary: MR is an important tool in cardiovascular research and has been applied to assess cardiovascular risk factors including obesity and atrial fibrillation. While these studies provide insight into disease causation, understanding the strengths and limitations of the technique is important for appropriate interpretation of results.

AB - Purpose of Review: Mendelian randomization (MR) is a technique that uses natural genetic variation to assess the potential causal role of a modifiable risk factor on cardiovascular disease. Advances have led to the identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms linked with risk factors that act as naturally randomized instruments to investigate the risk factor-disease relationship. Recent Findings: There are several pros and cons when using MR. It can address many limitations of observational study design including confounding, reverse causation, and demonstration of causality when a randomized controlled trial is not practical or feasible. However, several limitations do exist and include pleiotropy (multiple downstream effects of a single genetic variant), linkage disequilibrium (non-random association of genetic variation), and imprecise estimates of causal effects. Summary: MR is an important tool in cardiovascular research and has been applied to assess cardiovascular risk factors including obesity and atrial fibrillation. While these studies provide insight into disease causation, understanding the strengths and limitations of the technique is important for appropriate interpretation of results.

KW - Cardiovascular disease

KW - Cardiovascular risk factors

KW - Genetic variants

KW - Mendelian randomization

KW - Observational study design

KW - Randomized controlled trials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040828018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040828018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12170-018-0566-9

DO - 10.1007/s12170-018-0566-9

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85040828018

VL - 12

JO - Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports

JF - Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports

SN - 1932-9520

IS - 1

M1 - 2

ER -