The public's role in the evaluation of health care technology: The conflict over ECT

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), controversial since its inception, offers an instructive case study on the challenge of addressing patients' perspectives in the evaluation of health care technology. Despite widespread professional acceptance of ECT, groups of former psychiatric patients have worked through the U.S. legal system to restrict and even ban ECT in the treatment of mental illness. This unusual lay participation in the regulation of health care illustrates how differing conceptions of evidence can affect the evaluation of technology. ECT provides a powerful example of the value of a more complex definition of the significant outcomes of treatment and the growing practice of outcomes assessment, especially as such research is used to shape health policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)657-672
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Biomedical Technology
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Health Policy
Psychiatry
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Technology
Delivery of Health Care
Conflict (Psychology)
Research
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{58acd59cc6674d3c912c5439df23bbe9,
title = "The public's role in the evaluation of health care technology: The conflict over ECT",
abstract = "The use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), controversial since its inception, offers an instructive case study on the challenge of addressing patients' perspectives in the evaluation of health care technology. Despite widespread professional acceptance of ECT, groups of former psychiatric patients have worked through the U.S. legal system to restrict and even ban ECT in the treatment of mental illness. This unusual lay participation in the regulation of health care illustrates how differing conceptions of evidence can affect the evaluation of technology. ECT provides a powerful example of the value of a more complex definition of the significant outcomes of treatment and the growing practice of outcomes assessment, especially as such research is used to shape health policy.",
author = "Elizabeth Heitman",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0266462300010953",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "657--672",
journal = "International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care",
issn = "0266-4623",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The public's role in the evaluation of health care technology

T2 - The conflict over ECT

AU - Heitman, Elizabeth

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - The use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), controversial since its inception, offers an instructive case study on the challenge of addressing patients' perspectives in the evaluation of health care technology. Despite widespread professional acceptance of ECT, groups of former psychiatric patients have worked through the U.S. legal system to restrict and even ban ECT in the treatment of mental illness. This unusual lay participation in the regulation of health care illustrates how differing conceptions of evidence can affect the evaluation of technology. ECT provides a powerful example of the value of a more complex definition of the significant outcomes of treatment and the growing practice of outcomes assessment, especially as such research is used to shape health policy.

AB - The use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), controversial since its inception, offers an instructive case study on the challenge of addressing patients' perspectives in the evaluation of health care technology. Despite widespread professional acceptance of ECT, groups of former psychiatric patients have worked through the U.S. legal system to restrict and even ban ECT in the treatment of mental illness. This unusual lay participation in the regulation of health care illustrates how differing conceptions of evidence can affect the evaluation of technology. ECT provides a powerful example of the value of a more complex definition of the significant outcomes of treatment and the growing practice of outcomes assessment, especially as such research is used to shape health policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030474098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030474098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0266462300010953

DO - 10.1017/S0266462300010953

M3 - Review article

C2 - 9136474

AN - SCOPUS:0030474098

VL - 12

SP - 657

EP - 672

JO - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

JF - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

SN - 0266-4623

IS - 4

ER -