The redistribution of graduate medical education positions in 2005 failed to boost primary care or rural training

Candice Chen, Imam Xierali, Katie Piwnica-Worms, Robert Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Graduate medical education (GME), the system to train graduates of medical schools in their chosen specialties, costs the government nearly $13 billion annually, yet there is little accountability in the system for addressing critical physician shortages in specific specialties and geographic areas. Medicare provides the bulk of GME funds, and the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 redistributed nearly 3,000 residency positions among the nation's hospitals, largely in an effort to train more residents in primary care and in rural areas. However, when we analyzed the outcomes of this recent effort, we found that out of 304 hospitals receiving additional positions, only 12 were rural, and they received fewer than 3 percent of all positions redistributed. Although primary care training had net positive growth after redistribution, the relative growth of nonprimary care training was twice as large and diverted would-be primary care physicians to subspecialty training. Thus, the two legislative and regulatory priorities for the redistribution were not met. Future legislation should reevaluate the formulas that determine GME payments and potentially delink them from the hospital prospective payment system. Furthermore, better health care workforce data and analysis are needed to link GME payments to health care workforce needs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)102-110
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 14 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Graduate Medical Education
Primary Health Care
Health Manpower
Medication Therapy Management
Prospective Payment System
Delivery of Health Care
Social Responsibility
Primary Care Physicians
Financial Management
Internship and Residency
Growth
Medicare
Medical Schools
Legislation
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

The redistribution of graduate medical education positions in 2005 failed to boost primary care or rural training. / Chen, Candice; Xierali, Imam; Piwnica-Worms, Katie; Phillips, Robert.

In: Health Affairs, Vol. 32, No. 1, 14.01.2013, p. 102-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, Candice ; Xierali, Imam ; Piwnica-Worms, Katie ; Phillips, Robert. / The redistribution of graduate medical education positions in 2005 failed to boost primary care or rural training. In: Health Affairs. 2013 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 102-110.
@article{b918ff25b3d947daadeca3739ffc1e7d,
title = "The redistribution of graduate medical education positions in 2005 failed to boost primary care or rural training",
abstract = "Graduate medical education (GME), the system to train graduates of medical schools in their chosen specialties, costs the government nearly $13 billion annually, yet there is little accountability in the system for addressing critical physician shortages in specific specialties and geographic areas. Medicare provides the bulk of GME funds, and the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 redistributed nearly 3,000 residency positions among the nation's hospitals, largely in an effort to train more residents in primary care and in rural areas. However, when we analyzed the outcomes of this recent effort, we found that out of 304 hospitals receiving additional positions, only 12 were rural, and they received fewer than 3 percent of all positions redistributed. Although primary care training had net positive growth after redistribution, the relative growth of nonprimary care training was twice as large and diverted would-be primary care physicians to subspecialty training. Thus, the two legislative and regulatory priorities for the redistribution were not met. Future legislation should reevaluate the formulas that determine GME payments and potentially delink them from the hospital prospective payment system. Furthermore, better health care workforce data and analysis are needed to link GME payments to health care workforce needs.",
author = "Candice Chen and Imam Xierali and Katie Piwnica-Worms and Robert Phillips",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "102--110",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The redistribution of graduate medical education positions in 2005 failed to boost primary care or rural training

AU - Chen, Candice

AU - Xierali, Imam

AU - Piwnica-Worms, Katie

AU - Phillips, Robert

PY - 2013/1/14

Y1 - 2013/1/14

N2 - Graduate medical education (GME), the system to train graduates of medical schools in their chosen specialties, costs the government nearly $13 billion annually, yet there is little accountability in the system for addressing critical physician shortages in specific specialties and geographic areas. Medicare provides the bulk of GME funds, and the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 redistributed nearly 3,000 residency positions among the nation's hospitals, largely in an effort to train more residents in primary care and in rural areas. However, when we analyzed the outcomes of this recent effort, we found that out of 304 hospitals receiving additional positions, only 12 were rural, and they received fewer than 3 percent of all positions redistributed. Although primary care training had net positive growth after redistribution, the relative growth of nonprimary care training was twice as large and diverted would-be primary care physicians to subspecialty training. Thus, the two legislative and regulatory priorities for the redistribution were not met. Future legislation should reevaluate the formulas that determine GME payments and potentially delink them from the hospital prospective payment system. Furthermore, better health care workforce data and analysis are needed to link GME payments to health care workforce needs.

AB - Graduate medical education (GME), the system to train graduates of medical schools in their chosen specialties, costs the government nearly $13 billion annually, yet there is little accountability in the system for addressing critical physician shortages in specific specialties and geographic areas. Medicare provides the bulk of GME funds, and the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 redistributed nearly 3,000 residency positions among the nation's hospitals, largely in an effort to train more residents in primary care and in rural areas. However, when we analyzed the outcomes of this recent effort, we found that out of 304 hospitals receiving additional positions, only 12 were rural, and they received fewer than 3 percent of all positions redistributed. Although primary care training had net positive growth after redistribution, the relative growth of nonprimary care training was twice as large and diverted would-be primary care physicians to subspecialty training. Thus, the two legislative and regulatory priorities for the redistribution were not met. Future legislation should reevaluate the formulas that determine GME payments and potentially delink them from the hospital prospective payment system. Furthermore, better health care workforce data and analysis are needed to link GME payments to health care workforce needs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872076239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872076239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0032

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0032

M3 - Article

C2 - 23297277

AN - SCOPUS:84872076239

VL - 32

SP - 102

EP - 110

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 1

ER -