The role of airway fluoroscopy in the evaluation of children with stridor

Eric Berg, Iman Naseri, Steven E. Sobol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of pediatric laryngotracheal abnormalities. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary care children's hospital. Patients: Thirty-nine children, with a mean age of 18 months at the time of evaluation, were evaluated for stridor. Main Outcome Measures: Diagnoses made by airway fluoroscopy and endoscopy. The medical records of patients who had undergone both airway fluoroscopy and airway endoscopy for the evaluation of stridor over a 5-year period were reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis at any level, and airway mass lesions were determined using endoscopic evaluation as the "gold standard." Results: Twenty-three of 39 patients (59%) received a different diagnosis by airway endoscopy than by airway fluoroscopy. The sensitivity of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis, and an airway mass was 27%, 20%, 69%, and 43%, respectively. The specificity for the same diagnoses was 100%, 94%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: Airway fluoroscopy appears to be reliable in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis, and airway masses because of its high specificity. However, its sensitivity in detecting these common causes of stridor is poor. Negative fluoroscopic study results require further diagnostic evaluation if the clinical indication exists; therefore, the value of fluoroscopy as a screening tool remains uncertain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)415-418
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume134
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Fluoroscopy
Respiratory Sounds
Laryngomalacia
Tracheomalacia
Endoscopy
Pathologic Constriction
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tertiary Healthcare
Medical Records
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pediatrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

The role of airway fluoroscopy in the evaluation of children with stridor. / Berg, Eric; Naseri, Iman; Sobol, Steven E.

In: Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 134, No. 4, 04.2008, p. 415-418.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berg, Eric ; Naseri, Iman ; Sobol, Steven E. / The role of airway fluoroscopy in the evaluation of children with stridor. In: Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2008 ; Vol. 134, No. 4. pp. 415-418.
@article{f7ba699074da474ba68b97c17db198e4,
title = "The role of airway fluoroscopy in the evaluation of children with stridor",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of pediatric laryngotracheal abnormalities. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary care children's hospital. Patients: Thirty-nine children, with a mean age of 18 months at the time of evaluation, were evaluated for stridor. Main Outcome Measures: Diagnoses made by airway fluoroscopy and endoscopy. The medical records of patients who had undergone both airway fluoroscopy and airway endoscopy for the evaluation of stridor over a 5-year period were reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis at any level, and airway mass lesions were determined using endoscopic evaluation as the {"}gold standard.{"} Results: Twenty-three of 39 patients (59{\%}) received a different diagnosis by airway endoscopy than by airway fluoroscopy. The sensitivity of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis, and an airway mass was 27{\%}, 20{\%}, 69{\%}, and 43{\%}, respectively. The specificity for the same diagnoses was 100{\%}, 94{\%}, 100{\%}, and 100{\%}, respectively. Conclusions: Airway fluoroscopy appears to be reliable in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis, and airway masses because of its high specificity. However, its sensitivity in detecting these common causes of stridor is poor. Negative fluoroscopic study results require further diagnostic evaluation if the clinical indication exists; therefore, the value of fluoroscopy as a screening tool remains uncertain.",
author = "Eric Berg and Iman Naseri and Sobol, {Steven E.}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1001/archotol.134.4.415",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "134",
pages = "415--418",
journal = "JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "2168-6181",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of airway fluoroscopy in the evaluation of children with stridor

AU - Berg, Eric

AU - Naseri, Iman

AU - Sobol, Steven E.

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of pediatric laryngotracheal abnormalities. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary care children's hospital. Patients: Thirty-nine children, with a mean age of 18 months at the time of evaluation, were evaluated for stridor. Main Outcome Measures: Diagnoses made by airway fluoroscopy and endoscopy. The medical records of patients who had undergone both airway fluoroscopy and airway endoscopy for the evaluation of stridor over a 5-year period were reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis at any level, and airway mass lesions were determined using endoscopic evaluation as the "gold standard." Results: Twenty-three of 39 patients (59%) received a different diagnosis by airway endoscopy than by airway fluoroscopy. The sensitivity of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis, and an airway mass was 27%, 20%, 69%, and 43%, respectively. The specificity for the same diagnoses was 100%, 94%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: Airway fluoroscopy appears to be reliable in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis, and airway masses because of its high specificity. However, its sensitivity in detecting these common causes of stridor is poor. Negative fluoroscopic study results require further diagnostic evaluation if the clinical indication exists; therefore, the value of fluoroscopy as a screening tool remains uncertain.

AB - Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of pediatric laryngotracheal abnormalities. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary care children's hospital. Patients: Thirty-nine children, with a mean age of 18 months at the time of evaluation, were evaluated for stridor. Main Outcome Measures: Diagnoses made by airway fluoroscopy and endoscopy. The medical records of patients who had undergone both airway fluoroscopy and airway endoscopy for the evaluation of stridor over a 5-year period were reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis at any level, and airway mass lesions were determined using endoscopic evaluation as the "gold standard." Results: Twenty-three of 39 patients (59%) received a different diagnosis by airway endoscopy than by airway fluoroscopy. The sensitivity of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis, and an airway mass was 27%, 20%, 69%, and 43%, respectively. The specificity for the same diagnoses was 100%, 94%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: Airway fluoroscopy appears to be reliable in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis, and airway masses because of its high specificity. However, its sensitivity in detecting these common causes of stridor is poor. Negative fluoroscopic study results require further diagnostic evaluation if the clinical indication exists; therefore, the value of fluoroscopy as a screening tool remains uncertain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42549107580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42549107580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archotol.134.4.415

DO - 10.1001/archotol.134.4.415

M3 - Article

C2 - 18427008

AN - SCOPUS:42549107580

VL - 134

SP - 415

EP - 418

JO - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

JF - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 2168-6181

IS - 4

ER -