The role of imaging techniques in evaluating possible graft infections

J. G. Modrall, G. P. Clagett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Imaging plays a central role in the management of graft infections. Most graft infections are clinically apparent, and imaging techniques are used primarily for diagnostic confirmation and operative planning. The accurate diagnosis of less overt graft infections requires a thorough understanding of the available imaging options. Late aortic graft infections (more than 3 months postoperative) are best evaluated initially by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) scanning. CT findings consistent with a graft infection include ectopic gas, perigraft fluid, perigraft inflammatory changes, anastomotic pseudoaneurysm, and thickening of adjacent bowel. MRI offers the additional advantage of T2-weighted images to identify perigraft inflammation and minute quantities of perigraft fluid. Radionuclide scanning techniques such as 111indium-labeled WBC scans are highly sensitive but suffer from a relative lack of specificity. Duplex ultrasonography is best applied to the diagnosis of late infections of superficial grafts. Sonographic findings of a graft infection include perigraft fluid and pseudoaneurysms. The imaging of early postoperative grafts (less than 3 months) for infection is problematic because perigraft fluid and inflammatory changes persist for up to 3 months postoperatively. Suspected early graft infections often require operative exploration for diagnosis. A thorough understanding of the utility and limitations of imaging techniques will enable the clinician to develop a reasonable diagnostic algorithm that is appropriate for each case.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)339-347
Number of pages9
JournalSeminars in Vascular Surgery
Volume12
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Transplants
Infection
False Aneurysm
Tomography
Delayed Diagnosis
Radioisotopes
Ultrasonography
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Gases
Inflammation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

The role of imaging techniques in evaluating possible graft infections. / Modrall, J. G.; Clagett, G. P.

In: Seminars in Vascular Surgery, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1999, p. 339-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1408807e9dec48c3acae5da65287f108,
title = "The role of imaging techniques in evaluating possible graft infections",
abstract = "Imaging plays a central role in the management of graft infections. Most graft infections are clinically apparent, and imaging techniques are used primarily for diagnostic confirmation and operative planning. The accurate diagnosis of less overt graft infections requires a thorough understanding of the available imaging options. Late aortic graft infections (more than 3 months postoperative) are best evaluated initially by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) scanning. CT findings consistent with a graft infection include ectopic gas, perigraft fluid, perigraft inflammatory changes, anastomotic pseudoaneurysm, and thickening of adjacent bowel. MRI offers the additional advantage of T2-weighted images to identify perigraft inflammation and minute quantities of perigraft fluid. Radionuclide scanning techniques such as 111indium-labeled WBC scans are highly sensitive but suffer from a relative lack of specificity. Duplex ultrasonography is best applied to the diagnosis of late infections of superficial grafts. Sonographic findings of a graft infection include perigraft fluid and pseudoaneurysms. The imaging of early postoperative grafts (less than 3 months) for infection is problematic because perigraft fluid and inflammatory changes persist for up to 3 months postoperatively. Suspected early graft infections often require operative exploration for diagnosis. A thorough understanding of the utility and limitations of imaging techniques will enable the clinician to develop a reasonable diagnostic algorithm that is appropriate for each case.",
author = "Modrall, {J. G.} and Clagett, {G. P.}",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "339--347",
journal = "Seminars in Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0895-7967",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of imaging techniques in evaluating possible graft infections

AU - Modrall, J. G.

AU - Clagett, G. P.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Imaging plays a central role in the management of graft infections. Most graft infections are clinically apparent, and imaging techniques are used primarily for diagnostic confirmation and operative planning. The accurate diagnosis of less overt graft infections requires a thorough understanding of the available imaging options. Late aortic graft infections (more than 3 months postoperative) are best evaluated initially by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) scanning. CT findings consistent with a graft infection include ectopic gas, perigraft fluid, perigraft inflammatory changes, anastomotic pseudoaneurysm, and thickening of adjacent bowel. MRI offers the additional advantage of T2-weighted images to identify perigraft inflammation and minute quantities of perigraft fluid. Radionuclide scanning techniques such as 111indium-labeled WBC scans are highly sensitive but suffer from a relative lack of specificity. Duplex ultrasonography is best applied to the diagnosis of late infections of superficial grafts. Sonographic findings of a graft infection include perigraft fluid and pseudoaneurysms. The imaging of early postoperative grafts (less than 3 months) for infection is problematic because perigraft fluid and inflammatory changes persist for up to 3 months postoperatively. Suspected early graft infections often require operative exploration for diagnosis. A thorough understanding of the utility and limitations of imaging techniques will enable the clinician to develop a reasonable diagnostic algorithm that is appropriate for each case.

AB - Imaging plays a central role in the management of graft infections. Most graft infections are clinically apparent, and imaging techniques are used primarily for diagnostic confirmation and operative planning. The accurate diagnosis of less overt graft infections requires a thorough understanding of the available imaging options. Late aortic graft infections (more than 3 months postoperative) are best evaluated initially by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) scanning. CT findings consistent with a graft infection include ectopic gas, perigraft fluid, perigraft inflammatory changes, anastomotic pseudoaneurysm, and thickening of adjacent bowel. MRI offers the additional advantage of T2-weighted images to identify perigraft inflammation and minute quantities of perigraft fluid. Radionuclide scanning techniques such as 111indium-labeled WBC scans are highly sensitive but suffer from a relative lack of specificity. Duplex ultrasonography is best applied to the diagnosis of late infections of superficial grafts. Sonographic findings of a graft infection include perigraft fluid and pseudoaneurysms. The imaging of early postoperative grafts (less than 3 months) for infection is problematic because perigraft fluid and inflammatory changes persist for up to 3 months postoperatively. Suspected early graft infections often require operative exploration for diagnosis. A thorough understanding of the utility and limitations of imaging techniques will enable the clinician to develop a reasonable diagnostic algorithm that is appropriate for each case.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033387513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033387513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 339

EP - 347

JO - Seminars in Vascular Surgery

JF - Seminars in Vascular Surgery

SN - 0895-7967

IS - 4

ER -