The small for gestational age infant: Accelerated or delayed pulmonary maturation? Increased or decreased survival?

J. E. Tyson, K. Kennedy, S. Broyles, C. R. Rosenfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

132 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. Small for gestational age (SGA) neonates have been considered to have accelerated pulmonary maturation and thus a lower risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) than appropriate for gestational age (AGA) neonates. This, however, has not been thoroughly examined. Therefore, we compared SGA infants with AGA infants of the same gestational age (GA) with respect to risk of RDS, respiratory failure, or death. Population. An indigent population born in a large county hospital. Methods. Multivariate analyses were performed controlling for GA alone or for GA, race, sex, and congenital anomalies. Because the proper method to identify SGA infants is unclear, we performed separate analyses using different GA estimates (obstetric or pediatric) and intrauterine growth grids (hospital-specific grids or grids for a healthy, geographically-defined population). Results. SGA infants did not fare better than AGA infants in any analysis. SGA infants had significantly increased risk in some analyses of RDS and in almost all analyses of respiratory failure or death. The risk associated with being SGA was generally comparable to that associated with male sex or White race. Conclusion. The concept that intrauterine growth retardation accelerates lung maturation and improves outcome is not supported in comparisons of SGA and AGA infants of the same GA, sex, and race. This widely accepted concept deserves critical re-evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)534-538
Number of pages5
JournalPediatrics
Volume95
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Small for Gestational Age Infant
Gestational Age
Lung
Respiratory Insufficiency
Newborn Infant
Population
County Hospitals
Fetal Growth Retardation
Poverty
Obstetrics

Keywords

  • fetal growth
  • gestational age
  • neonatal mortality
  • respiratory distress syndrome
  • small for gestational age

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

The small for gestational age infant : Accelerated or delayed pulmonary maturation? Increased or decreased survival? / Tyson, J. E.; Kennedy, K.; Broyles, S.; Rosenfeld, C. R.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 95, No. 4, 1995, p. 534-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{01ca4e32ca4e495c9c3064643c67a228,
title = "The small for gestational age infant: Accelerated or delayed pulmonary maturation? Increased or decreased survival?",
abstract = "Objective. Small for gestational age (SGA) neonates have been considered to have accelerated pulmonary maturation and thus a lower risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) than appropriate for gestational age (AGA) neonates. This, however, has not been thoroughly examined. Therefore, we compared SGA infants with AGA infants of the same gestational age (GA) with respect to risk of RDS, respiratory failure, or death. Population. An indigent population born in a large county hospital. Methods. Multivariate analyses were performed controlling for GA alone or for GA, race, sex, and congenital anomalies. Because the proper method to identify SGA infants is unclear, we performed separate analyses using different GA estimates (obstetric or pediatric) and intrauterine growth grids (hospital-specific grids or grids for a healthy, geographically-defined population). Results. SGA infants did not fare better than AGA infants in any analysis. SGA infants had significantly increased risk in some analyses of RDS and in almost all analyses of respiratory failure or death. The risk associated with being SGA was generally comparable to that associated with male sex or White race. Conclusion. The concept that intrauterine growth retardation accelerates lung maturation and improves outcome is not supported in comparisons of SGA and AGA infants of the same GA, sex, and race. This widely accepted concept deserves critical re-evaluation.",
keywords = "fetal growth, gestational age, neonatal mortality, respiratory distress syndrome, small for gestational age",
author = "Tyson, {J. E.} and K. Kennedy and S. Broyles and Rosenfeld, {C. R.}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "534--538",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The small for gestational age infant

T2 - Accelerated or delayed pulmonary maturation? Increased or decreased survival?

AU - Tyson, J. E.

AU - Kennedy, K.

AU - Broyles, S.

AU - Rosenfeld, C. R.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Objective. Small for gestational age (SGA) neonates have been considered to have accelerated pulmonary maturation and thus a lower risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) than appropriate for gestational age (AGA) neonates. This, however, has not been thoroughly examined. Therefore, we compared SGA infants with AGA infants of the same gestational age (GA) with respect to risk of RDS, respiratory failure, or death. Population. An indigent population born in a large county hospital. Methods. Multivariate analyses were performed controlling for GA alone or for GA, race, sex, and congenital anomalies. Because the proper method to identify SGA infants is unclear, we performed separate analyses using different GA estimates (obstetric or pediatric) and intrauterine growth grids (hospital-specific grids or grids for a healthy, geographically-defined population). Results. SGA infants did not fare better than AGA infants in any analysis. SGA infants had significantly increased risk in some analyses of RDS and in almost all analyses of respiratory failure or death. The risk associated with being SGA was generally comparable to that associated with male sex or White race. Conclusion. The concept that intrauterine growth retardation accelerates lung maturation and improves outcome is not supported in comparisons of SGA and AGA infants of the same GA, sex, and race. This widely accepted concept deserves critical re-evaluation.

AB - Objective. Small for gestational age (SGA) neonates have been considered to have accelerated pulmonary maturation and thus a lower risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) than appropriate for gestational age (AGA) neonates. This, however, has not been thoroughly examined. Therefore, we compared SGA infants with AGA infants of the same gestational age (GA) with respect to risk of RDS, respiratory failure, or death. Population. An indigent population born in a large county hospital. Methods. Multivariate analyses were performed controlling for GA alone or for GA, race, sex, and congenital anomalies. Because the proper method to identify SGA infants is unclear, we performed separate analyses using different GA estimates (obstetric or pediatric) and intrauterine growth grids (hospital-specific grids or grids for a healthy, geographically-defined population). Results. SGA infants did not fare better than AGA infants in any analysis. SGA infants had significantly increased risk in some analyses of RDS and in almost all analyses of respiratory failure or death. The risk associated with being SGA was generally comparable to that associated with male sex or White race. Conclusion. The concept that intrauterine growth retardation accelerates lung maturation and improves outcome is not supported in comparisons of SGA and AGA infants of the same GA, sex, and race. This widely accepted concept deserves critical re-evaluation.

KW - fetal growth

KW - gestational age

KW - neonatal mortality

KW - respiratory distress syndrome

KW - small for gestational age

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028920848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028920848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7700754

AN - SCOPUS:0028920848

VL - 95

SP - 534

EP - 538

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 4

ER -