The step-and-shoot IMRT overshooting phenomenon

A novel method to mitigate patient overdosage

Heming Zhen, Luo Ouyang, Qinan Bao, Nan Qin, Strahinja Stojadinovic, Arnold Pompos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The goal of this work is to evaluate the dosimetric impact of an overshooting phenomenon in step-and-shoot IMRT delivery, and to demonstrate a novel method to mitigate the issue. Five pelvis IMRT patients treated on Varian 2100C EX linacs with larger than +4.5% phantom ion chamber point-dose difference relative to planned dose were investigated. For each patient plan, 5 fractions were delivered. DynaLog files were recorded and centi-MU pulses from dose integrator board for every control point (CP) were counted using a commercial pulse counter. The counter recorded CP MU agrees with DynaLog records, both showing an ~ 0.6MU overshoot of the first segment of every beam. The 3D patient dose was recalculated from the counter records and compared to the planned dose, showing that the overshoot resulted in on average 2.05% of PTV D95 error, and 2.49%, 2.61% and 2.45% of D1cc error for rectum, bladder, and bowel, respectively. The initial plans were then modified by inserting a specially designed MLC segment to the start of every beam. The modified plans were also delivered five times. The dose from the modified delivery was calculated using counter recorded CP MU. The corresponding Dx parameters were all within 0.31% from the original plan. IMRT QA results also show a 2.2% improvement in ion chamber point-dose agreement. The results demonstrate that the proposed plan modification method effectively eliminates the overdosage from the overshooting phenomenon.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)214-222
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Dosimetry
Ionization chambers
dosage
Ions
counters
Pelvis
Rectum
ionization chambers
Urinary Bladder
delivery
rectum
pelvis
bladder
integrators
pulses
files

Keywords

  • IMRT overshoot

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Instrumentation
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

The step-and-shoot IMRT overshooting phenomenon : A novel method to mitigate patient overdosage. / Zhen, Heming; Ouyang, Luo; Bao, Qinan; Qin, Nan; Stojadinovic, Strahinja; Pompos, Arnold.

In: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 17, No. 4, 01.01.2016, p. 214-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d1282357a77414d9509aab1ac98b904,
title = "The step-and-shoot IMRT overshooting phenomenon: A novel method to mitigate patient overdosage",
abstract = "The goal of this work is to evaluate the dosimetric impact of an overshooting phenomenon in step-and-shoot IMRT delivery, and to demonstrate a novel method to mitigate the issue. Five pelvis IMRT patients treated on Varian 2100C EX linacs with larger than +4.5{\%} phantom ion chamber point-dose difference relative to planned dose were investigated. For each patient plan, 5 fractions were delivered. DynaLog files were recorded and centi-MU pulses from dose integrator board for every control point (CP) were counted using a commercial pulse counter. The counter recorded CP MU agrees with DynaLog records, both showing an ~ 0.6MU overshoot of the first segment of every beam. The 3D patient dose was recalculated from the counter records and compared to the planned dose, showing that the overshoot resulted in on average 2.05{\%} of PTV D95 error, and 2.49{\%}, 2.61{\%} and 2.45{\%} of D1cc error for rectum, bladder, and bowel, respectively. The initial plans were then modified by inserting a specially designed MLC segment to the start of every beam. The modified plans were also delivered five times. The dose from the modified delivery was calculated using counter recorded CP MU. The corresponding Dx parameters were all within 0.31{\%} from the original plan. IMRT QA results also show a 2.2{\%} improvement in ion chamber point-dose agreement. The results demonstrate that the proposed plan modification method effectively eliminates the overdosage from the overshooting phenomenon.",
keywords = "IMRT overshoot",
author = "Heming Zhen and Luo Ouyang and Qinan Bao and Nan Qin and Strahinja Stojadinovic and Arnold Pompos",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6101",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "214--222",
journal = "Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics",
issn = "1526-9914",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The step-and-shoot IMRT overshooting phenomenon

T2 - A novel method to mitigate patient overdosage

AU - Zhen, Heming

AU - Ouyang, Luo

AU - Bao, Qinan

AU - Qin, Nan

AU - Stojadinovic, Strahinja

AU - Pompos, Arnold

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - The goal of this work is to evaluate the dosimetric impact of an overshooting phenomenon in step-and-shoot IMRT delivery, and to demonstrate a novel method to mitigate the issue. Five pelvis IMRT patients treated on Varian 2100C EX linacs with larger than +4.5% phantom ion chamber point-dose difference relative to planned dose were investigated. For each patient plan, 5 fractions were delivered. DynaLog files were recorded and centi-MU pulses from dose integrator board for every control point (CP) were counted using a commercial pulse counter. The counter recorded CP MU agrees with DynaLog records, both showing an ~ 0.6MU overshoot of the first segment of every beam. The 3D patient dose was recalculated from the counter records and compared to the planned dose, showing that the overshoot resulted in on average 2.05% of PTV D95 error, and 2.49%, 2.61% and 2.45% of D1cc error for rectum, bladder, and bowel, respectively. The initial plans were then modified by inserting a specially designed MLC segment to the start of every beam. The modified plans were also delivered five times. The dose from the modified delivery was calculated using counter recorded CP MU. The corresponding Dx parameters were all within 0.31% from the original plan. IMRT QA results also show a 2.2% improvement in ion chamber point-dose agreement. The results demonstrate that the proposed plan modification method effectively eliminates the overdosage from the overshooting phenomenon.

AB - The goal of this work is to evaluate the dosimetric impact of an overshooting phenomenon in step-and-shoot IMRT delivery, and to demonstrate a novel method to mitigate the issue. Five pelvis IMRT patients treated on Varian 2100C EX linacs with larger than +4.5% phantom ion chamber point-dose difference relative to planned dose were investigated. For each patient plan, 5 fractions were delivered. DynaLog files were recorded and centi-MU pulses from dose integrator board for every control point (CP) were counted using a commercial pulse counter. The counter recorded CP MU agrees with DynaLog records, both showing an ~ 0.6MU overshoot of the first segment of every beam. The 3D patient dose was recalculated from the counter records and compared to the planned dose, showing that the overshoot resulted in on average 2.05% of PTV D95 error, and 2.49%, 2.61% and 2.45% of D1cc error for rectum, bladder, and bowel, respectively. The initial plans were then modified by inserting a specially designed MLC segment to the start of every beam. The modified plans were also delivered five times. The dose from the modified delivery was calculated using counter recorded CP MU. The corresponding Dx parameters were all within 0.31% from the original plan. IMRT QA results also show a 2.2% improvement in ion chamber point-dose agreement. The results demonstrate that the proposed plan modification method effectively eliminates the overdosage from the overshooting phenomenon.

KW - IMRT overshoot

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047289892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047289892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6101

DO - 10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6101

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 214

EP - 222

JO - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

SN - 1526-9914

IS - 4

ER -