The use of a remifentanil infusion for hemodynamic control during intracranial surgery

Zsuzsanna Gesztesi, Brady Lee Mootz, Paul F. White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

Remifentamil is an extremely rapid and short-acting opioid analgesic which is effective in controlling acute stress responses during surgery. During neurosurgical anesthesia, laryngoscopy and intubation, application of the head holder, scalp incision, and the craniectomy can produce significant increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP). In this dose-response study, we evaluated the efficacy of a remifentanil infusion in maintaining hemodynamic stability during intracranial surgery under desflurane anesthesia. Forty-five patients were assigned randomly to one of the three remifentanil infusion groups. All patients received a standardized anesthetic induction consisting of midazolam, 2 mg IV, lidocaine 0.75 mg/kg IV, propofol 1.0 mg/kg IV, and remifentanil 0.5 μg/kg IV. Immediately after induction of anesthesia, a remifentamil infusion was started at 0.0625 μg · kg-1 · min-1 (Group 1), 0.125 μg · kg-1 · min-1 (Group 2), or 0.250 μg · kg-1 · min- 1 (Group 3) according to a double-blinded study protocol. Maintenance of anesthesia consisted of desflurane 3% (end-tidal) in air/oxygen. If the MAP exceeded 80 mm Hg, a supplemental bolus of remifentanil, 0.5 μg/kg IV was administered, and when the MAP decreased below 65 mmHg, the remifentamil infusion was discontinued temporarily. 'Rescue' cardiovascular medications consisted of nitroprusside (100 μg IV) or phenylephrine (100 μg IV). Heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and MAP values, were recorded every minute for 20 min after each specific stimulus. The overall quality of the intraoperative hemodynamic control was evaluated by the attending anesthesiologist on a scale from 1 = poor to 5 = excellent. The overall quality of the hemodynamic control was superior in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (P < 0.05). Although the total dose of remifentanil administered during the study period did not differ among the three groups, Group 1 required significantly more supplemental boluses of remifentanil (66%-80%) than Groups 2 (13%-33%) and 3 (7%13%), and the remifentanil infusion was discontinued more often in Group 3 (80%-93%) than in Groups 1 (0%13%) and 2 (21%,40%). In conclusion, the recommended remifentanil infusion rate for controlling acute autonomic responses during neurosurgical anesthesia is 0.125 μg · kg-1 · min-1 when administered during a desflurane-based anesthetic. Implications: Compared with remifentanil 0.0625 μg · kg-1 · min-1 and 0.250 μg · kg-1 · min2+, a remifentanil infusion rate of 0.125 μg · kg2+ · min-1 provided more stable hemodynamic conditions during intracranial surgery under desflurane anesthesia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1282-1287
Number of pages6
JournalAnesthesia and analgesia
Volume89
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The use of a remifentanil infusion for hemodynamic control during intracranial surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this