The Use of Protease Inhibitors in Pregnancy: Maternal and Fetal Considerations

Elaine Duryea, Fiona Nicholson, Sara Cooper, Scott Roberts, Vanessa Rogers, Donald McIntire, Jeanne Sheffield, Robert Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Scopus citations


Background. Previous studies examining protease inhibitor use in pregnancy and the rate of preterm and small-for-gestational-age infants have yielded conflicting results. Methods. This was a retrospective study of HIV-infected women who delivered singleton infants at our institution between 1984 and 2014. Women with protease inhibitor use were compared to women on regimens without a protease inhibitor as well as those who received no antepartum antiretroviral therapy. Infants were considered preterm if less than 37 completed weeks of gestation and small-for-gestational-age if less than 10th percentile. Results. During the study period 1,004 pregnancies met inclusion criteria. Of those, 597 received a protease inhibitor as part of their regimen, 230 ART without a protease inhibitor, and 177 no ART. There was no difference in the rate of preterm birth between groups who received ART with or without a protease inhibitor, 14% versus 13%. There was no difference in the rate of small-for-gestational-age infants between the three groups. Use of a protease inhibitor was associated with a greater fall in viral load during pregnancy, p

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number563727
JournalInfectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology
StatePublished - 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Dermatology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Use of Protease Inhibitors in Pregnancy: Maternal and Fetal Considerations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this