The utility of the forced oscillation technique in assessing bronchodilator responsiveness in patients with asthma

Makito Yaegashi, Venkata A K Yalamanchili, Vaidehi Kaza, Jeremy Weedon, Albert E. Heurich, Michael J. Akerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To address the utility of the forced oscillation technique (FOT) in assessing bronchodilator responsiveness compared with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive 126 patients with a clinical history of asthma without any other lung diseases at a pulmonary function testing laboratory. The following measurements were obtained three times each, before and after two doses of pirbuterol 0.2 mg inhalation: the respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (Rrs5), the mean respiratory resistance between 5 and 20 Hz (Rrs5-20), and the mean respiratory conductance (Grs5-20) by FOT and the FEV1 by spirometer. These measurements were transformed into dimensionless subject-specific effect-size "d-scores" by dividing them by the estimated pooled within-subject standard deviation. Results: Descriptive statistics for each value were the following [mean baseline value (±sd), Δ value (pre- minus post value), and d-score (P value compared to FEV1)]: Grs5-20 (L s-1 kPa-1) [1.79±0.53, Δ=+0.39, d=2.64 (P<0.001)], Rrs5-20 (kPa L-1 s) [0.60±0.16L, Δ=-0.10, d=2.56 (P=0.001)], Rrs5 (kPa L-1 s) [0.78±0.25, Δ=-0.16, d=2.52 (P<0.001)], and FEV1 (L) [1.90±0.64, Δ=-0.20, d=1.83]. The higher d-score of Grs5-20, Rrs5-20 and Rrs5 compared to FEV1 indicates that these are better indicators for bronchodilator response than FEV1. The percentages of subjects exhibiting change in the expected direction after bronchodilator were not significantly different between each value: Rrs5 (85.7%), Rrs5-20 (83.3%), Grs5-20 (83.3%), and FEV1 (83.3%) [P>0.05]. Conclusions: Several forced oscillation measures, namely Grs5-20, Rrs5-20 and Rrs5, are more accurate and sensitive for detecting bronchodilator response than FEV1 in patients with asthma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)995-1000
Number of pages6
JournalRespiratory Medicine
Volume101
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

Bronchodilator Agents
Forced Expiratory Volume
Asthma
Inhalation
Lung Diseases
Lung

Keywords

  • Airway obstruction
  • Asthma
  • Bronchodilator
  • Forced oscillation
  • Impulse oscillometry system (IOS)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

The utility of the forced oscillation technique in assessing bronchodilator responsiveness in patients with asthma. / Yaegashi, Makito; Yalamanchili, Venkata A K; Kaza, Vaidehi; Weedon, Jeremy; Heurich, Albert E.; Akerman, Michael J.

In: Respiratory Medicine, Vol. 101, No. 5, 05.2007, p. 995-1000.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yaegashi, Makito ; Yalamanchili, Venkata A K ; Kaza, Vaidehi ; Weedon, Jeremy ; Heurich, Albert E. ; Akerman, Michael J. / The utility of the forced oscillation technique in assessing bronchodilator responsiveness in patients with asthma. In: Respiratory Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 101, No. 5. pp. 995-1000.
@article{537361a97a0a46d9aceb6e50c8539eee,
title = "The utility of the forced oscillation technique in assessing bronchodilator responsiveness in patients with asthma",
abstract = "Objective: To address the utility of the forced oscillation technique (FOT) in assessing bronchodilator responsiveness compared with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive 126 patients with a clinical history of asthma without any other lung diseases at a pulmonary function testing laboratory. The following measurements were obtained three times each, before and after two doses of pirbuterol 0.2 mg inhalation: the respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (Rrs5), the mean respiratory resistance between 5 and 20 Hz (Rrs5-20), and the mean respiratory conductance (Grs5-20) by FOT and the FEV1 by spirometer. These measurements were transformed into dimensionless subject-specific effect-size {"}d-scores{"} by dividing them by the estimated pooled within-subject standard deviation. Results: Descriptive statistics for each value were the following [mean baseline value (±sd), Δ value (pre- minus post value), and d-score (P value compared to FEV1)]: Grs5-20 (L s-1 kPa-1) [1.79±0.53, Δ=+0.39, d=2.64 (P<0.001)], Rrs5-20 (kPa L-1 s) [0.60±0.16L, Δ=-0.10, d=2.56 (P=0.001)], Rrs5 (kPa L-1 s) [0.78±0.25, Δ=-0.16, d=2.52 (P<0.001)], and FEV1 (L) [1.90±0.64, Δ=-0.20, d=1.83]. The higher d-score of Grs5-20, Rrs5-20 and Rrs5 compared to FEV1 indicates that these are better indicators for bronchodilator response than FEV1. The percentages of subjects exhibiting change in the expected direction after bronchodilator were not significantly different between each value: Rrs5 (85.7{\%}), Rrs5-20 (83.3{\%}), Grs5-20 (83.3{\%}), and FEV1 (83.3{\%}) [P>0.05]. Conclusions: Several forced oscillation measures, namely Grs5-20, Rrs5-20 and Rrs5, are more accurate and sensitive for detecting bronchodilator response than FEV1 in patients with asthma.",
keywords = "Airway obstruction, Asthma, Bronchodilator, Forced oscillation, Impulse oscillometry system (IOS)",
author = "Makito Yaegashi and Yalamanchili, {Venkata A K} and Vaidehi Kaza and Jeremy Weedon and Heurich, {Albert E.} and Akerman, {Michael J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.rmed.2006.09.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "995--1000",
journal = "Respiratory Medicine",
issn = "0954-6111",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The utility of the forced oscillation technique in assessing bronchodilator responsiveness in patients with asthma

AU - Yaegashi, Makito

AU - Yalamanchili, Venkata A K

AU - Kaza, Vaidehi

AU - Weedon, Jeremy

AU - Heurich, Albert E.

AU - Akerman, Michael J.

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Objective: To address the utility of the forced oscillation technique (FOT) in assessing bronchodilator responsiveness compared with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive 126 patients with a clinical history of asthma without any other lung diseases at a pulmonary function testing laboratory. The following measurements were obtained three times each, before and after two doses of pirbuterol 0.2 mg inhalation: the respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (Rrs5), the mean respiratory resistance between 5 and 20 Hz (Rrs5-20), and the mean respiratory conductance (Grs5-20) by FOT and the FEV1 by spirometer. These measurements were transformed into dimensionless subject-specific effect-size "d-scores" by dividing them by the estimated pooled within-subject standard deviation. Results: Descriptive statistics for each value were the following [mean baseline value (±sd), Δ value (pre- minus post value), and d-score (P value compared to FEV1)]: Grs5-20 (L s-1 kPa-1) [1.79±0.53, Δ=+0.39, d=2.64 (P<0.001)], Rrs5-20 (kPa L-1 s) [0.60±0.16L, Δ=-0.10, d=2.56 (P=0.001)], Rrs5 (kPa L-1 s) [0.78±0.25, Δ=-0.16, d=2.52 (P<0.001)], and FEV1 (L) [1.90±0.64, Δ=-0.20, d=1.83]. The higher d-score of Grs5-20, Rrs5-20 and Rrs5 compared to FEV1 indicates that these are better indicators for bronchodilator response than FEV1. The percentages of subjects exhibiting change in the expected direction after bronchodilator were not significantly different between each value: Rrs5 (85.7%), Rrs5-20 (83.3%), Grs5-20 (83.3%), and FEV1 (83.3%) [P>0.05]. Conclusions: Several forced oscillation measures, namely Grs5-20, Rrs5-20 and Rrs5, are more accurate and sensitive for detecting bronchodilator response than FEV1 in patients with asthma.

AB - Objective: To address the utility of the forced oscillation technique (FOT) in assessing bronchodilator responsiveness compared with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive 126 patients with a clinical history of asthma without any other lung diseases at a pulmonary function testing laboratory. The following measurements were obtained three times each, before and after two doses of pirbuterol 0.2 mg inhalation: the respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (Rrs5), the mean respiratory resistance between 5 and 20 Hz (Rrs5-20), and the mean respiratory conductance (Grs5-20) by FOT and the FEV1 by spirometer. These measurements were transformed into dimensionless subject-specific effect-size "d-scores" by dividing them by the estimated pooled within-subject standard deviation. Results: Descriptive statistics for each value were the following [mean baseline value (±sd), Δ value (pre- minus post value), and d-score (P value compared to FEV1)]: Grs5-20 (L s-1 kPa-1) [1.79±0.53, Δ=+0.39, d=2.64 (P<0.001)], Rrs5-20 (kPa L-1 s) [0.60±0.16L, Δ=-0.10, d=2.56 (P=0.001)], Rrs5 (kPa L-1 s) [0.78±0.25, Δ=-0.16, d=2.52 (P<0.001)], and FEV1 (L) [1.90±0.64, Δ=-0.20, d=1.83]. The higher d-score of Grs5-20, Rrs5-20 and Rrs5 compared to FEV1 indicates that these are better indicators for bronchodilator response than FEV1. The percentages of subjects exhibiting change in the expected direction after bronchodilator were not significantly different between each value: Rrs5 (85.7%), Rrs5-20 (83.3%), Grs5-20 (83.3%), and FEV1 (83.3%) [P>0.05]. Conclusions: Several forced oscillation measures, namely Grs5-20, Rrs5-20 and Rrs5, are more accurate and sensitive for detecting bronchodilator response than FEV1 in patients with asthma.

KW - Airway obstruction

KW - Asthma

KW - Bronchodilator

KW - Forced oscillation

KW - Impulse oscillometry system (IOS)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947728910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947728910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.09.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 17056244

AN - SCOPUS:33947728910

VL - 101

SP - 995

EP - 1000

JO - Respiratory Medicine

JF - Respiratory Medicine

SN - 0954-6111

IS - 5

ER -