The varying distribution of intra- and inter-vertebral height ratios determines the prevalence of vertebral fractures

Roger Martin Zebaze Djoumessi, Ghassan Maalouf, Joseph Wehbe, Alexandre Nehme, Naim Maalouf, Ego Seeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Credible inferences regarding the burden of vertebral fractures (VFs) cannot be made without a globally accepted quantitative definition of 'fracture'. Currently, differences in anterior, middle, or posterior vertebral heights (VHs) within a vertebra, or between adjacent vertebrae, are used to define 'fracture'. However, VH differences are essential for the construction of thoracolumbar curves, evolutionary adaptations that provide stability in bipedal stance and gait. As there is no reference standard to distinguish anatomical variation from fracture, approaches to defining a VF use a reference range of VH ratios derived in premenopausal women or derived by trimming, a method that iteratively removes the tails of a distribution of VH ratios to produce a normal distribution. From this, reference ranges of VH ratio means and standard deviations (SDs) are obtained and a nominal deviation of 15% or more, or 3 SD or more is regarded as a 'fracture'. We measured VHs by quantitative vertebral morphometry (QVM) and bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in 697 Lebanese women (age 20-89 years) to compare the prevalence of VF ascertained by published methods and a new method that uses the premenopausal range (without trimming) and requires two VH abnormalities. VF prevalence using published methods reached 60% to 70% in pre- and post-menopausal women, and in women with normal or high BMD because VH ratios were not normally distributed and cut-offs used to define VF fracture fell within the observed distribution of the data. The new method resulted in a VF prevalence of 3.3% in younger and 14% in older women, 7% (high), 10% (middle), and 20% (low) BMD tertiles consistent with the notion that the method detected VF due to bone fragility. We suggest that using a fixed trimming method to define reference range and cut-offs or applying fixed cut-offs to identify VFs in populations, where these ratios are not normally distributed, may result in the capture of anatomical variation, not structural failure. Thus, group differences in the VF prevalence may reflect differences in methodology, not bone fragility. Improved criteria to define VF are needed before credible inferences can be made regarding the burden of VFs in women and men, and between sexes, races, countries, decades, and placebo arms of clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)348-356
Number of pages9
JournalBone
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004

Fingerprint

Bone Density
Reference Values
Spine
Bone and Bones
Normal Distribution
Photon Absorptiometry
Gait
Placebos
Clinical Trials
Population

Keywords

  • Distribution
  • Fracture
  • Vertebral heights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Hematology

Cite this

The varying distribution of intra- and inter-vertebral height ratios determines the prevalence of vertebral fractures. / Zebaze Djoumessi, Roger Martin; Maalouf, Ghassan; Wehbe, Joseph; Nehme, Alexandre; Maalouf, Naim; Seeman, Ego.

In: Bone, Vol. 35, No. 2, 08.2004, p. 348-356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zebaze Djoumessi, Roger Martin ; Maalouf, Ghassan ; Wehbe, Joseph ; Nehme, Alexandre ; Maalouf, Naim ; Seeman, Ego. / The varying distribution of intra- and inter-vertebral height ratios determines the prevalence of vertebral fractures. In: Bone. 2004 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 348-356.
@article{912b4df440c14691b58c5f331eb53d52,
title = "The varying distribution of intra- and inter-vertebral height ratios determines the prevalence of vertebral fractures",
abstract = "Credible inferences regarding the burden of vertebral fractures (VFs) cannot be made without a globally accepted quantitative definition of 'fracture'. Currently, differences in anterior, middle, or posterior vertebral heights (VHs) within a vertebra, or between adjacent vertebrae, are used to define 'fracture'. However, VH differences are essential for the construction of thoracolumbar curves, evolutionary adaptations that provide stability in bipedal stance and gait. As there is no reference standard to distinguish anatomical variation from fracture, approaches to defining a VF use a reference range of VH ratios derived in premenopausal women or derived by trimming, a method that iteratively removes the tails of a distribution of VH ratios to produce a normal distribution. From this, reference ranges of VH ratio means and standard deviations (SDs) are obtained and a nominal deviation of 15{\%} or more, or 3 SD or more is regarded as a 'fracture'. We measured VHs by quantitative vertebral morphometry (QVM) and bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in 697 Lebanese women (age 20-89 years) to compare the prevalence of VF ascertained by published methods and a new method that uses the premenopausal range (without trimming) and requires two VH abnormalities. VF prevalence using published methods reached 60{\%} to 70{\%} in pre- and post-menopausal women, and in women with normal or high BMD because VH ratios were not normally distributed and cut-offs used to define VF fracture fell within the observed distribution of the data. The new method resulted in a VF prevalence of 3.3{\%} in younger and 14{\%} in older women, 7{\%} (high), 10{\%} (middle), and 20{\%} (low) BMD tertiles consistent with the notion that the method detected VF due to bone fragility. We suggest that using a fixed trimming method to define reference range and cut-offs or applying fixed cut-offs to identify VFs in populations, where these ratios are not normally distributed, may result in the capture of anatomical variation, not structural failure. Thus, group differences in the VF prevalence may reflect differences in methodology, not bone fragility. Improved criteria to define VF are needed before credible inferences can be made regarding the burden of VFs in women and men, and between sexes, races, countries, decades, and placebo arms of clinical trials.",
keywords = "Distribution, Fracture, Vertebral heights",
author = "{Zebaze Djoumessi}, {Roger Martin} and Ghassan Maalouf and Joseph Wehbe and Alexandre Nehme and Naim Maalouf and Ego Seeman",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "348--356",
journal = "Bone",
issn = "8756-3282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The varying distribution of intra- and inter-vertebral height ratios determines the prevalence of vertebral fractures

AU - Zebaze Djoumessi, Roger Martin

AU - Maalouf, Ghassan

AU - Wehbe, Joseph

AU - Nehme, Alexandre

AU - Maalouf, Naim

AU - Seeman, Ego

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - Credible inferences regarding the burden of vertebral fractures (VFs) cannot be made without a globally accepted quantitative definition of 'fracture'. Currently, differences in anterior, middle, or posterior vertebral heights (VHs) within a vertebra, or between adjacent vertebrae, are used to define 'fracture'. However, VH differences are essential for the construction of thoracolumbar curves, evolutionary adaptations that provide stability in bipedal stance and gait. As there is no reference standard to distinguish anatomical variation from fracture, approaches to defining a VF use a reference range of VH ratios derived in premenopausal women or derived by trimming, a method that iteratively removes the tails of a distribution of VH ratios to produce a normal distribution. From this, reference ranges of VH ratio means and standard deviations (SDs) are obtained and a nominal deviation of 15% or more, or 3 SD or more is regarded as a 'fracture'. We measured VHs by quantitative vertebral morphometry (QVM) and bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in 697 Lebanese women (age 20-89 years) to compare the prevalence of VF ascertained by published methods and a new method that uses the premenopausal range (without trimming) and requires two VH abnormalities. VF prevalence using published methods reached 60% to 70% in pre- and post-menopausal women, and in women with normal or high BMD because VH ratios were not normally distributed and cut-offs used to define VF fracture fell within the observed distribution of the data. The new method resulted in a VF prevalence of 3.3% in younger and 14% in older women, 7% (high), 10% (middle), and 20% (low) BMD tertiles consistent with the notion that the method detected VF due to bone fragility. We suggest that using a fixed trimming method to define reference range and cut-offs or applying fixed cut-offs to identify VFs in populations, where these ratios are not normally distributed, may result in the capture of anatomical variation, not structural failure. Thus, group differences in the VF prevalence may reflect differences in methodology, not bone fragility. Improved criteria to define VF are needed before credible inferences can be made regarding the burden of VFs in women and men, and between sexes, races, countries, decades, and placebo arms of clinical trials.

AB - Credible inferences regarding the burden of vertebral fractures (VFs) cannot be made without a globally accepted quantitative definition of 'fracture'. Currently, differences in anterior, middle, or posterior vertebral heights (VHs) within a vertebra, or between adjacent vertebrae, are used to define 'fracture'. However, VH differences are essential for the construction of thoracolumbar curves, evolutionary adaptations that provide stability in bipedal stance and gait. As there is no reference standard to distinguish anatomical variation from fracture, approaches to defining a VF use a reference range of VH ratios derived in premenopausal women or derived by trimming, a method that iteratively removes the tails of a distribution of VH ratios to produce a normal distribution. From this, reference ranges of VH ratio means and standard deviations (SDs) are obtained and a nominal deviation of 15% or more, or 3 SD or more is regarded as a 'fracture'. We measured VHs by quantitative vertebral morphometry (QVM) and bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in 697 Lebanese women (age 20-89 years) to compare the prevalence of VF ascertained by published methods and a new method that uses the premenopausal range (without trimming) and requires two VH abnormalities. VF prevalence using published methods reached 60% to 70% in pre- and post-menopausal women, and in women with normal or high BMD because VH ratios were not normally distributed and cut-offs used to define VF fracture fell within the observed distribution of the data. The new method resulted in a VF prevalence of 3.3% in younger and 14% in older women, 7% (high), 10% (middle), and 20% (low) BMD tertiles consistent with the notion that the method detected VF due to bone fragility. We suggest that using a fixed trimming method to define reference range and cut-offs or applying fixed cut-offs to identify VFs in populations, where these ratios are not normally distributed, may result in the capture of anatomical variation, not structural failure. Thus, group differences in the VF prevalence may reflect differences in methodology, not bone fragility. Improved criteria to define VF are needed before credible inferences can be made regarding the burden of VFs in women and men, and between sexes, races, countries, decades, and placebo arms of clinical trials.

KW - Distribution

KW - Fracture

KW - Vertebral heights

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242698912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242698912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.026

DO - 10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.026

M3 - Article

C2 - 15268883

AN - SCOPUS:3242698912

VL - 35

SP - 348

EP - 356

JO - Bone

JF - Bone

SN - 8756-3282

IS - 2

ER -