Three-dimensional US volume analysis of gastric pseudotumors in a porcine model

Anil Vegesna, Rina Raju, Wassim Asfari, Annapurna Korimilli, Apurva Varia, Nicholas Orfanidis, John Gaughan, Zeeshan Ramzan, Larry S. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Tumor burden is difficult to estimate by endoscopy and conventional EUS. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and the reliability of a new 3-dimensional (3D) EUS system in a pseudotumor model (Olympus EUS EXERA EU-M60). Design: A pseudotumor model was developed in a porcine stomach. Pseudotumors were created by injecting various volumes of US gel (0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 1 mL) into porcine stomach specimens, and then the volume was measured in vitro. Two investigators made volume measurements by outlining the cross-sectional area of the pseudotumor at different radial planes. The instrument then automatically calculated the volume based on the outlined cross-sectional areas. The measured volume was compared with the actual volume of the pseudotumor by using a Bland-Altman analysis. Every second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and tenth image was measured to calculate the tumor volume and to determine the optimum number of images required for accurate volume determination. Inter- and intraobserver variability, percentage error, Bland-Altman analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and kappa statistic were performed. Setting: This study was performed in an in vitro animal model. Patients: There were no patients involved in this study. Main Outcome Measurements: Accuracy and reliability of pseudotumor volume measurement. Results: When averaging across all measurements, the overall average mean error was 3.25%. The overall inter-rater reliability as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.78. The overall intra-rater reliability as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99. Bland-Altman analysis and ANOVA showed similar low variability for measured volumes based on image frequencies for volume calculations between every other and every sixth image but greater variability for measured volumes based on every tenth image. Larger pseudotumors were measured with a slight decrease in mean percentage error. The kappa statistic for interobserver variability was .61, which demonstrated substantial agreement among observers. Limitations: The major limitation of this technology is the penetration of the US beam to evaluate large tumors, because the US transducer is high frequency (20 MHz) and, therefore, has a limited penetration. Conclusions: In conclusion, the new Olympus EUS EXERA EU-M60 3D US probe allowed for accurate volume measurements of small pseudotumors in porcine stomach model in vitro. There was substantial evaluator agreement, with a low interobserver variability. Larger pseudotumors were measured with a slightly lower percentage error than smaller pseudotumors. Volumes measured with a greater number of radial images were measured slightly more accurately. We plan to test this device in patients with GI tumors in the near future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)635-640
Number of pages6
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume64
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2006

Fingerprint

Observer Variation
Stomach
Swine
Tumor Burden
Analysis of Variance
Transducers
Endoscopy
Neoplasms
Animal Models
Gels
Research Personnel
Technology
Equipment and Supplies
In Vitro Techniques

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Vegesna, A., Raju, R., Asfari, W., Korimilli, A., Varia, A., Orfanidis, N., ... Miller, L. S. (2006). Three-dimensional US volume analysis of gastric pseudotumors in a porcine model. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 64(4), 635-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.034

Three-dimensional US volume analysis of gastric pseudotumors in a porcine model. / Vegesna, Anil; Raju, Rina; Asfari, Wassim; Korimilli, Annapurna; Varia, Apurva; Orfanidis, Nicholas; Gaughan, John; Ramzan, Zeeshan; Miller, Larry S.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 64, No. 4, 10.2006, p. 635-640.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vegesna, A, Raju, R, Asfari, W, Korimilli, A, Varia, A, Orfanidis, N, Gaughan, J, Ramzan, Z & Miller, LS 2006, 'Three-dimensional US volume analysis of gastric pseudotumors in a porcine model', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 635-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.034
Vegesna A, Raju R, Asfari W, Korimilli A, Varia A, Orfanidis N et al. Three-dimensional US volume analysis of gastric pseudotumors in a porcine model. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2006 Oct;64(4):635-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.034
Vegesna, Anil ; Raju, Rina ; Asfari, Wassim ; Korimilli, Annapurna ; Varia, Apurva ; Orfanidis, Nicholas ; Gaughan, John ; Ramzan, Zeeshan ; Miller, Larry S. / Three-dimensional US volume analysis of gastric pseudotumors in a porcine model. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2006 ; Vol. 64, No. 4. pp. 635-640.
@article{0bc297de2fc44636a28d1857e5ddf052,
title = "Three-dimensional US volume analysis of gastric pseudotumors in a porcine model",
abstract = "Background: Tumor burden is difficult to estimate by endoscopy and conventional EUS. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and the reliability of a new 3-dimensional (3D) EUS system in a pseudotumor model (Olympus EUS EXERA EU-M60). Design: A pseudotumor model was developed in a porcine stomach. Pseudotumors were created by injecting various volumes of US gel (0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 1 mL) into porcine stomach specimens, and then the volume was measured in vitro. Two investigators made volume measurements by outlining the cross-sectional area of the pseudotumor at different radial planes. The instrument then automatically calculated the volume based on the outlined cross-sectional areas. The measured volume was compared with the actual volume of the pseudotumor by using a Bland-Altman analysis. Every second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and tenth image was measured to calculate the tumor volume and to determine the optimum number of images required for accurate volume determination. Inter- and intraobserver variability, percentage error, Bland-Altman analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and kappa statistic were performed. Setting: This study was performed in an in vitro animal model. Patients: There were no patients involved in this study. Main Outcome Measurements: Accuracy and reliability of pseudotumor volume measurement. Results: When averaging across all measurements, the overall average mean error was 3.25{\%}. The overall inter-rater reliability as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.78. The overall intra-rater reliability as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99. Bland-Altman analysis and ANOVA showed similar low variability for measured volumes based on image frequencies for volume calculations between every other and every sixth image but greater variability for measured volumes based on every tenth image. Larger pseudotumors were measured with a slight decrease in mean percentage error. The kappa statistic for interobserver variability was .61, which demonstrated substantial agreement among observers. Limitations: The major limitation of this technology is the penetration of the US beam to evaluate large tumors, because the US transducer is high frequency (20 MHz) and, therefore, has a limited penetration. Conclusions: In conclusion, the new Olympus EUS EXERA EU-M60 3D US probe allowed for accurate volume measurements of small pseudotumors in porcine stomach model in vitro. There was substantial evaluator agreement, with a low interobserver variability. Larger pseudotumors were measured with a slightly lower percentage error than smaller pseudotumors. Volumes measured with a greater number of radial images were measured slightly more accurately. We plan to test this device in patients with GI tumors in the near future.",
author = "Anil Vegesna and Rina Raju and Wassim Asfari and Annapurna Korimilli and Apurva Varia and Nicholas Orfanidis and John Gaughan and Zeeshan Ramzan and Miller, {Larry S.}",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "635--640",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three-dimensional US volume analysis of gastric pseudotumors in a porcine model

AU - Vegesna, Anil

AU - Raju, Rina

AU - Asfari, Wassim

AU - Korimilli, Annapurna

AU - Varia, Apurva

AU - Orfanidis, Nicholas

AU - Gaughan, John

AU - Ramzan, Zeeshan

AU - Miller, Larry S.

PY - 2006/10

Y1 - 2006/10

N2 - Background: Tumor burden is difficult to estimate by endoscopy and conventional EUS. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and the reliability of a new 3-dimensional (3D) EUS system in a pseudotumor model (Olympus EUS EXERA EU-M60). Design: A pseudotumor model was developed in a porcine stomach. Pseudotumors were created by injecting various volumes of US gel (0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 1 mL) into porcine stomach specimens, and then the volume was measured in vitro. Two investigators made volume measurements by outlining the cross-sectional area of the pseudotumor at different radial planes. The instrument then automatically calculated the volume based on the outlined cross-sectional areas. The measured volume was compared with the actual volume of the pseudotumor by using a Bland-Altman analysis. Every second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and tenth image was measured to calculate the tumor volume and to determine the optimum number of images required for accurate volume determination. Inter- and intraobserver variability, percentage error, Bland-Altman analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and kappa statistic were performed. Setting: This study was performed in an in vitro animal model. Patients: There were no patients involved in this study. Main Outcome Measurements: Accuracy and reliability of pseudotumor volume measurement. Results: When averaging across all measurements, the overall average mean error was 3.25%. The overall inter-rater reliability as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.78. The overall intra-rater reliability as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99. Bland-Altman analysis and ANOVA showed similar low variability for measured volumes based on image frequencies for volume calculations between every other and every sixth image but greater variability for measured volumes based on every tenth image. Larger pseudotumors were measured with a slight decrease in mean percentage error. The kappa statistic for interobserver variability was .61, which demonstrated substantial agreement among observers. Limitations: The major limitation of this technology is the penetration of the US beam to evaluate large tumors, because the US transducer is high frequency (20 MHz) and, therefore, has a limited penetration. Conclusions: In conclusion, the new Olympus EUS EXERA EU-M60 3D US probe allowed for accurate volume measurements of small pseudotumors in porcine stomach model in vitro. There was substantial evaluator agreement, with a low interobserver variability. Larger pseudotumors were measured with a slightly lower percentage error than smaller pseudotumors. Volumes measured with a greater number of radial images were measured slightly more accurately. We plan to test this device in patients with GI tumors in the near future.

AB - Background: Tumor burden is difficult to estimate by endoscopy and conventional EUS. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and the reliability of a new 3-dimensional (3D) EUS system in a pseudotumor model (Olympus EUS EXERA EU-M60). Design: A pseudotumor model was developed in a porcine stomach. Pseudotumors were created by injecting various volumes of US gel (0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 1 mL) into porcine stomach specimens, and then the volume was measured in vitro. Two investigators made volume measurements by outlining the cross-sectional area of the pseudotumor at different radial planes. The instrument then automatically calculated the volume based on the outlined cross-sectional areas. The measured volume was compared with the actual volume of the pseudotumor by using a Bland-Altman analysis. Every second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and tenth image was measured to calculate the tumor volume and to determine the optimum number of images required for accurate volume determination. Inter- and intraobserver variability, percentage error, Bland-Altman analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and kappa statistic were performed. Setting: This study was performed in an in vitro animal model. Patients: There were no patients involved in this study. Main Outcome Measurements: Accuracy and reliability of pseudotumor volume measurement. Results: When averaging across all measurements, the overall average mean error was 3.25%. The overall inter-rater reliability as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.78. The overall intra-rater reliability as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99. Bland-Altman analysis and ANOVA showed similar low variability for measured volumes based on image frequencies for volume calculations between every other and every sixth image but greater variability for measured volumes based on every tenth image. Larger pseudotumors were measured with a slight decrease in mean percentage error. The kappa statistic for interobserver variability was .61, which demonstrated substantial agreement among observers. Limitations: The major limitation of this technology is the penetration of the US beam to evaluate large tumors, because the US transducer is high frequency (20 MHz) and, therefore, has a limited penetration. Conclusions: In conclusion, the new Olympus EUS EXERA EU-M60 3D US probe allowed for accurate volume measurements of small pseudotumors in porcine stomach model in vitro. There was substantial evaluator agreement, with a low interobserver variability. Larger pseudotumors were measured with a slightly lower percentage error than smaller pseudotumors. Volumes measured with a greater number of radial images were measured slightly more accurately. We plan to test this device in patients with GI tumors in the near future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748688210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748688210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.034

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.034

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 635

EP - 640

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 4

ER -