TY - JOUR
T1 - Thrombolytic therapy for wake-up stroke
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Mac Grory, Brian
AU - Saldanha, Ian J.
AU - Mistry, Eva A.
AU - Stretz, Christoph
AU - Poli, Sven
AU - Sykora, Marek
AU - Kellert, Lars
AU - Feil, Katharina
AU - Shah, Shreyansh
AU - McTaggart, Ryan
AU - Riebau, Derek
AU - Yaghi, Shadi
AU - Gaines, Kenneth
AU - Xian, Ying
AU - Feng, Wuwei
AU - Schrag, Matthew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 European Academy of Neurology
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background and purpose: According to evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, patients presenting with disabling stroke symptoms should be treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) within 4.5 h of time last known well. However, 25% of strokes are detected upon awakening (i.e., wake-up stroke [WUS]), which renders patients ineligible for IV tPA administered via time-based treatment algorithms, because it is impossible to establish a reliable time of symptom onset. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of IV tPA compared with normal saline, placebo, or no treatment in patients with WUS using imaging-based treatment algorithms. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus between January 1, 2006 and April 30, 2020. We included controlled trials (randomized or nonrandomized), observational cohort studies (prospective or retrospective), and single-arm studies in which adults with WUS were administered IV tPA after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- or computed tomography (CT)-based imaging. Our primary outcome was recovery at 90 days (defined as a modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0–2), and our secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 36 h, mortality, and other adverse effects. Results: We included 16 studies that enrolled a total of 14,017 patients. Most studies were conducted in Europe (37.5%) or North America (37.5%), and 1757 patients (12.5%) received IV tPA. All studies used MRI-based (five studies) or CT-based (10 studies) imaging selection, and one study used a combination of modalities. Sixty-one percent of patients receiving IV tPA achieved an mRS score of 0 to 2 at 90 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51%–70%, 12 studies), with a relative risk (RR) of 1.21 compared with patients not receiving IV tPA (95% CI: 1.01–1.46, four studies). Three percent of patients receiving IV tPA experienced sICH within 36 h (95% CI: 2.5%–4.1%; 16 studies), which is an RR of 4.00 compared with patients not receiving IV tPA (95% CI: 2.85–5.61, seven studies). Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that IV tPA is associated with a better functional outcome at 90 days despite the increased but acceptable risk of sICH. Based on these results, IV tPA should be offered as a treatment for WUS patients with favorable neuroimaging findings.
AB - Background and purpose: According to evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, patients presenting with disabling stroke symptoms should be treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) within 4.5 h of time last known well. However, 25% of strokes are detected upon awakening (i.e., wake-up stroke [WUS]), which renders patients ineligible for IV tPA administered via time-based treatment algorithms, because it is impossible to establish a reliable time of symptom onset. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of IV tPA compared with normal saline, placebo, or no treatment in patients with WUS using imaging-based treatment algorithms. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus between January 1, 2006 and April 30, 2020. We included controlled trials (randomized or nonrandomized), observational cohort studies (prospective or retrospective), and single-arm studies in which adults with WUS were administered IV tPA after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- or computed tomography (CT)-based imaging. Our primary outcome was recovery at 90 days (defined as a modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0–2), and our secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 36 h, mortality, and other adverse effects. Results: We included 16 studies that enrolled a total of 14,017 patients. Most studies were conducted in Europe (37.5%) or North America (37.5%), and 1757 patients (12.5%) received IV tPA. All studies used MRI-based (five studies) or CT-based (10 studies) imaging selection, and one study used a combination of modalities. Sixty-one percent of patients receiving IV tPA achieved an mRS score of 0 to 2 at 90 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51%–70%, 12 studies), with a relative risk (RR) of 1.21 compared with patients not receiving IV tPA (95% CI: 1.01–1.46, four studies). Three percent of patients receiving IV tPA experienced sICH within 36 h (95% CI: 2.5%–4.1%; 16 studies), which is an RR of 4.00 compared with patients not receiving IV tPA (95% CI: 2.85–5.61, seven studies). Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that IV tPA is associated with a better functional outcome at 90 days despite the increased but acceptable risk of sICH. Based on these results, IV tPA should be offered as a treatment for WUS patients with favorable neuroimaging findings.
KW - ischemic stroke
KW - perfusion-based imaging
KW - tPA
KW - thrombolysis
KW - wake-up-stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104356292&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104356292&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ene.14839
DO - 10.1111/ene.14839
M3 - Article
C2 - 33772987
AN - SCOPUS:85104356292
SN - 1351-5101
VL - 28
SP - 2006
EP - 2016
JO - European Journal of Neurology
JF - European Journal of Neurology
IS - 6
ER -