Torsional Fracture of the Humerus after Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis with an Interference Screw: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

David P. Beason, Jay P. Shah, James W. Duckett, Patrick W. Jost, Glenn S. Fleisig, E. Lyle Cain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Humeral fracture following subpectoral biceps tenodesis has been previously reported; however, there are no published biomechanical studies reporting the resulting torsional strength of the humerus. Our purpose was to determine if there is an increased risk of humerus fracture after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw and to determine if screw size is also a factor. We hypothesized that limbs receiving the procedure would have reduced failure torque and rotation under external rotation compared to untreated controls and that the larger screw size would result in inferior mechanical properties compared to the smaller. Methods Twenty matched pairs of embalmed cadaveric humeri were subjected to subpectoral biceps tenodesis using either a 6.25 or 8.0 mm interference screw, with the untreated contralateral limb serving as a control. Each humerus was mechanically tested in torsional external rotation to failure. Findings Maximum torque and rotation to failure were reduced in the tenodesis group compared to controls; however, there was no difference between screw sizes. When both screw sizes were combined into a single group, paired t-tests also showed similar differences. Interpretation Based on our experiment, there is an increased risk for humerus spiral fracture when subjected to torsional external rotation after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw compared to an intact humerus; however, there is not a significant difference between a 6.25 mm and 8.0 mm screw. Surgeons may elect to use alternative fixation methods in patients at high risk (e.g., overhead throwing athletes, etc.) for torsional loads and fracture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)915-920
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Biomechanics
Volume30
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Tenodesis
Humerus
Torque
Extremities
Humeral Fractures
Bone Fractures
Athletes

Keywords

  • Biceps tenodesis
  • Biomechanical
  • Humerus
  • Interference screw
  • Spiral fracture
  • Torsion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Torsional Fracture of the Humerus after Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis with an Interference Screw : A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study. / Beason, David P.; Shah, Jay P.; Duckett, James W.; Jost, Patrick W.; Fleisig, Glenn S.; Cain, E. Lyle.

In: Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 30, No. 9, 01.01.2015, p. 915-920.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beason, David P. ; Shah, Jay P. ; Duckett, James W. ; Jost, Patrick W. ; Fleisig, Glenn S. ; Cain, E. Lyle. / Torsional Fracture of the Humerus after Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis with an Interference Screw : A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study. In: Clinical Biomechanics. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 9. pp. 915-920.
@article{6fb658aa2a8f430f82973bbacd6c52b2,
title = "Torsional Fracture of the Humerus after Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis with an Interference Screw: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study",
abstract = "Background Humeral fracture following subpectoral biceps tenodesis has been previously reported; however, there are no published biomechanical studies reporting the resulting torsional strength of the humerus. Our purpose was to determine if there is an increased risk of humerus fracture after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw and to determine if screw size is also a factor. We hypothesized that limbs receiving the procedure would have reduced failure torque and rotation under external rotation compared to untreated controls and that the larger screw size would result in inferior mechanical properties compared to the smaller. Methods Twenty matched pairs of embalmed cadaveric humeri were subjected to subpectoral biceps tenodesis using either a 6.25 or 8.0 mm interference screw, with the untreated contralateral limb serving as a control. Each humerus was mechanically tested in torsional external rotation to failure. Findings Maximum torque and rotation to failure were reduced in the tenodesis group compared to controls; however, there was no difference between screw sizes. When both screw sizes were combined into a single group, paired t-tests also showed similar differences. Interpretation Based on our experiment, there is an increased risk for humerus spiral fracture when subjected to torsional external rotation after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw compared to an intact humerus; however, there is not a significant difference between a 6.25 mm and 8.0 mm screw. Surgeons may elect to use alternative fixation methods in patients at high risk (e.g., overhead throwing athletes, etc.) for torsional loads and fracture.",
keywords = "Biceps tenodesis, Biomechanical, Humerus, Interference screw, Spiral fracture, Torsion",
author = "Beason, {David P.} and Shah, {Jay P.} and Duckett, {James W.} and Jost, {Patrick W.} and Fleisig, {Glenn S.} and Cain, {E. Lyle}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.07.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "915--920",
journal = "Clinical Biomechanics",
issn = "0268-0033",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Torsional Fracture of the Humerus after Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis with an Interference Screw

T2 - A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

AU - Beason, David P.

AU - Shah, Jay P.

AU - Duckett, James W.

AU - Jost, Patrick W.

AU - Fleisig, Glenn S.

AU - Cain, E. Lyle

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background Humeral fracture following subpectoral biceps tenodesis has been previously reported; however, there are no published biomechanical studies reporting the resulting torsional strength of the humerus. Our purpose was to determine if there is an increased risk of humerus fracture after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw and to determine if screw size is also a factor. We hypothesized that limbs receiving the procedure would have reduced failure torque and rotation under external rotation compared to untreated controls and that the larger screw size would result in inferior mechanical properties compared to the smaller. Methods Twenty matched pairs of embalmed cadaveric humeri were subjected to subpectoral biceps tenodesis using either a 6.25 or 8.0 mm interference screw, with the untreated contralateral limb serving as a control. Each humerus was mechanically tested in torsional external rotation to failure. Findings Maximum torque and rotation to failure were reduced in the tenodesis group compared to controls; however, there was no difference between screw sizes. When both screw sizes were combined into a single group, paired t-tests also showed similar differences. Interpretation Based on our experiment, there is an increased risk for humerus spiral fracture when subjected to torsional external rotation after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw compared to an intact humerus; however, there is not a significant difference between a 6.25 mm and 8.0 mm screw. Surgeons may elect to use alternative fixation methods in patients at high risk (e.g., overhead throwing athletes, etc.) for torsional loads and fracture.

AB - Background Humeral fracture following subpectoral biceps tenodesis has been previously reported; however, there are no published biomechanical studies reporting the resulting torsional strength of the humerus. Our purpose was to determine if there is an increased risk of humerus fracture after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw and to determine if screw size is also a factor. We hypothesized that limbs receiving the procedure would have reduced failure torque and rotation under external rotation compared to untreated controls and that the larger screw size would result in inferior mechanical properties compared to the smaller. Methods Twenty matched pairs of embalmed cadaveric humeri were subjected to subpectoral biceps tenodesis using either a 6.25 or 8.0 mm interference screw, with the untreated contralateral limb serving as a control. Each humerus was mechanically tested in torsional external rotation to failure. Findings Maximum torque and rotation to failure were reduced in the tenodesis group compared to controls; however, there was no difference between screw sizes. When both screw sizes were combined into a single group, paired t-tests also showed similar differences. Interpretation Based on our experiment, there is an increased risk for humerus spiral fracture when subjected to torsional external rotation after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw compared to an intact humerus; however, there is not a significant difference between a 6.25 mm and 8.0 mm screw. Surgeons may elect to use alternative fixation methods in patients at high risk (e.g., overhead throwing athletes, etc.) for torsional loads and fracture.

KW - Biceps tenodesis

KW - Biomechanical

KW - Humerus

KW - Interference screw

KW - Spiral fracture

KW - Torsion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952875753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952875753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.07.009

DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.07.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 26255072

AN - SCOPUS:84952875753

VL - 30

SP - 915

EP - 920

JO - Clinical Biomechanics

JF - Clinical Biomechanics

SN - 0268-0033

IS - 9

ER -