Toward solving the sedation-assessment conundrum: Bispectral index monitoring and sedation interruption

DaiWai M. Olson, Carmelo Graffagnino, Kenneth King, John R. Lynch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The sedation-assessment conundrum arises from the conflict between two opposing goals: to maintain a safe and comfortable environment for the patient through the use of sedation, and the need for accurate neurologic evaluation that reflects the patient's best possible effort. Planned interruption of continuous intravenous sedation is a necessary part of routine nursing practice in the neuroscience critical care unit. The use of BIS monitoring as an adjunctive tool for sedation assessment to facilitate planned interruption in sedation is helpful in achieving a valid neurologic assessment. Critical care nurses are highly proficient at integrating specialized knowledge, skills, and technology into practice. Sandelowski [84] writes, "As the primary machine tenders in health care, nurses often acquire an understanding of how to apply, operate, and interpret the products of devices that becomes an integral part of the tacit know-how of clinical practice." Knowing how and when to place faith in technology, and to find the balance between objective and subjective assessment, allows for solutions to the sedation-neurologic assessment conundrum.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-267
Number of pages11
JournalCritical Care Nursing Clinics of North America
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005

Fingerprint

Nervous System
Critical Care
Nurses
Technology
Neurosciences
Nursing
Delivery of Health Care
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Toward solving the sedation-assessment conundrum : Bispectral index monitoring and sedation interruption. / Olson, DaiWai M.; Graffagnino, Carmelo; King, Kenneth; Lynch, John R.

In: Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, Vol. 17, No. 3, 09.2005, p. 257-267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7d1b9609e27546e9be9bdedc91a396f0,
title = "Toward solving the sedation-assessment conundrum: Bispectral index monitoring and sedation interruption",
abstract = "The sedation-assessment conundrum arises from the conflict between two opposing goals: to maintain a safe and comfortable environment for the patient through the use of sedation, and the need for accurate neurologic evaluation that reflects the patient's best possible effort. Planned interruption of continuous intravenous sedation is a necessary part of routine nursing practice in the neuroscience critical care unit. The use of BIS monitoring as an adjunctive tool for sedation assessment to facilitate planned interruption in sedation is helpful in achieving a valid neurologic assessment. Critical care nurses are highly proficient at integrating specialized knowledge, skills, and technology into practice. Sandelowski [84] writes, {"}As the primary machine tenders in health care, nurses often acquire an understanding of how to apply, operate, and interpret the products of devices that becomes an integral part of the tacit know-how of clinical practice.{"} Knowing how and when to place faith in technology, and to find the balance between objective and subjective assessment, allows for solutions to the sedation-neurologic assessment conundrum.",
author = "Olson, {DaiWai M.} and Carmelo Graffagnino and Kenneth King and Lynch, {John R.}",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.ccell.2005.04.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "257--267",
journal = "Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America",
issn = "0899-5885",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward solving the sedation-assessment conundrum

T2 - Bispectral index monitoring and sedation interruption

AU - Olson, DaiWai M.

AU - Graffagnino, Carmelo

AU - King, Kenneth

AU - Lynch, John R.

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - The sedation-assessment conundrum arises from the conflict between two opposing goals: to maintain a safe and comfortable environment for the patient through the use of sedation, and the need for accurate neurologic evaluation that reflects the patient's best possible effort. Planned interruption of continuous intravenous sedation is a necessary part of routine nursing practice in the neuroscience critical care unit. The use of BIS monitoring as an adjunctive tool for sedation assessment to facilitate planned interruption in sedation is helpful in achieving a valid neurologic assessment. Critical care nurses are highly proficient at integrating specialized knowledge, skills, and technology into practice. Sandelowski [84] writes, "As the primary machine tenders in health care, nurses often acquire an understanding of how to apply, operate, and interpret the products of devices that becomes an integral part of the tacit know-how of clinical practice." Knowing how and when to place faith in technology, and to find the balance between objective and subjective assessment, allows for solutions to the sedation-neurologic assessment conundrum.

AB - The sedation-assessment conundrum arises from the conflict between two opposing goals: to maintain a safe and comfortable environment for the patient through the use of sedation, and the need for accurate neurologic evaluation that reflects the patient's best possible effort. Planned interruption of continuous intravenous sedation is a necessary part of routine nursing practice in the neuroscience critical care unit. The use of BIS monitoring as an adjunctive tool for sedation assessment to facilitate planned interruption in sedation is helpful in achieving a valid neurologic assessment. Critical care nurses are highly proficient at integrating specialized knowledge, skills, and technology into practice. Sandelowski [84] writes, "As the primary machine tenders in health care, nurses often acquire an understanding of how to apply, operate, and interpret the products of devices that becomes an integral part of the tacit know-how of clinical practice." Knowing how and when to place faith in technology, and to find the balance between objective and subjective assessment, allows for solutions to the sedation-neurologic assessment conundrum.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23944450110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23944450110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ccell.2005.04.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ccell.2005.04.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 16115534

AN - SCOPUS:23944450110

VL - 17

SP - 257

EP - 267

JO - Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America

JF - Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America

SN - 0899-5885

IS - 3

ER -