TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward solving the sedation-assessment conundrum
T2 - Bispectral index monitoring and sedation interruption
AU - Olson, DaiWai M.
AU - Graffagnino, Carmelo
AU - King, Kenneth
AU - Lynch, John R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is supported by T32 NR07091 Interventions to Prevent and Manage Chronic Illness.
Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2005/9
Y1 - 2005/9
N2 - The sedation-assessment conundrum arises from the conflict between two opposing goals: to maintain a safe and comfortable environment for the patient through the use of sedation, and the need for accurate neurologic evaluation that reflects the patient's best possible effort. Planned interruption of continuous intravenous sedation is a necessary part of routine nursing practice in the neuroscience critical care unit. The use of BIS monitoring as an adjunctive tool for sedation assessment to facilitate planned interruption in sedation is helpful in achieving a valid neurologic assessment. Critical care nurses are highly proficient at integrating specialized knowledge, skills, and technology into practice. Sandelowski [84] writes, "As the primary machine tenders in health care, nurses often acquire an understanding of how to apply, operate, and interpret the products of devices that becomes an integral part of the tacit know-how of clinical practice." Knowing how and when to place faith in technology, and to find the balance between objective and subjective assessment, allows for solutions to the sedation-neurologic assessment conundrum.
AB - The sedation-assessment conundrum arises from the conflict between two opposing goals: to maintain a safe and comfortable environment for the patient through the use of sedation, and the need for accurate neurologic evaluation that reflects the patient's best possible effort. Planned interruption of continuous intravenous sedation is a necessary part of routine nursing practice in the neuroscience critical care unit. The use of BIS monitoring as an adjunctive tool for sedation assessment to facilitate planned interruption in sedation is helpful in achieving a valid neurologic assessment. Critical care nurses are highly proficient at integrating specialized knowledge, skills, and technology into practice. Sandelowski [84] writes, "As the primary machine tenders in health care, nurses often acquire an understanding of how to apply, operate, and interpret the products of devices that becomes an integral part of the tacit know-how of clinical practice." Knowing how and when to place faith in technology, and to find the balance between objective and subjective assessment, allows for solutions to the sedation-neurologic assessment conundrum.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23944450110&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23944450110&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ccell.2005.04.008
DO - 10.1016/j.ccell.2005.04.008
M3 - Review article
C2 - 16115534
AN - SCOPUS:23944450110
SN - 0899-5885
VL - 17
SP - 257
EP - 267
JO - Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America
JF - Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America
IS - 3
ER -