Transition of care for acute stroke and myocardial infarction patients

from hospitalization to rehabilitation, recovery, and secondary prevention.

Andrea D. Furlan, Daiwai M. Olson, Janet Prvu Bettger, Karen P. Alexander, Amy S. Kendrick, Julian R. Irvine, Liz Wing, Remy R. Coeytaux, Rowena J. Dolor, Pamela W. Duncan, Carmelo Graffagnino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To review the available published literature to assess whether evidence supports a beneficial role for coordinated transition of care services for the postacute care of patients hospitalized with first or recurrent stroke or myocardial infarction (MI). This review was framed around five areas of investigation: (1) key components of transition of care services, (2) evidence for improvement in functional outcomes, morbidity, mortality, and quality of life, (3) associated risks or potential harms, (4) evidence for improvement in systems of care, and (5) evidence that benefits and harms vary by patient-based or system-based characteristics. MEDLINE(®), CINAHL(®), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Embase(®). We included studies published in English from 2000 to 2011 that specified postacute hospitalization transition of care services as well as prevention of recurrent stroke or MI. A total of 62 articles representing 44 studies were included for data abstraction. Transition of care interventions were grouped into four categories: (1) hospital -initiated support for discharge was the initial stage in the transition of care process, (2) patient and family education interventions were started during hospitalization but were continued at the community level, (3) community-based models of support followed hospital discharge, and (4) chronic disease management models of care assumed the responsibility for long-term care. Early supported discharge after stroke was associated with reduced total hospital length of stay without adverse effects on functional recovery, and specialty care after MI was associated with reduced mortality. Because of several methodological shortcomings, most studies did not consistently demonstrate that any specific intervention resulted in improved patient-or system -based outcomes. Some studies included more than one intervention, which made it difficult to determine the effect of individual components on clinical outcomes. There was inconsistency in the definition of what constituted a component of transition of care compared to "standard care." Standard care was poorly defined, and nearly all studies were underpowered to demonstrate a statistical benefit. The endpoints varied greatly from study to study. Nearly all the studies were single-site based, and most (26 of 44) were conducted in countries with national health care systems quite different from that of the U.S., therefore limiting their generalizability. Although a basis for the definition of transition of care exists, more consensus is needed on the definition of the interventions and the outcomes appropriate to those interventions. There was limited evidence that two components of hospital-initiated support for discharge (early supported discharge after stroke and specialty care followup after MI)were associated with beneficial effects. No other interventions had sufficient evidence of benefit based on the findings of this systematic review. The adoption of a standard set of definitions, a refinement in the methodology used to study transition of care, and appropriate selection of patient-centered and policy-relevant outcomes should be employed to draw valid conclusions pertaining to specific components of transition of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-197
Number of pages197
JournalEvidence report/technology assessment
Issue number202
StatePublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Patient Transfer
Secondary Prevention
Hospitalization
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Myocardial Infarction
Length of Stay
Subacute Care
Patient Harm
Mortality
Long-Term Care
Patient Education
Disease Management
MEDLINE
Patient Selection
Consensus
Chronic Disease
Quality of Life
Databases
Morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Transition of care for acute stroke and myocardial infarction patients : from hospitalization to rehabilitation, recovery, and secondary prevention. / Furlan, Andrea D.; Olson, Daiwai M.; Bettger, Janet Prvu; Alexander, Karen P.; Kendrick, Amy S.; Irvine, Julian R.; Wing, Liz; Coeytaux, Remy R.; Dolor, Rowena J.; Duncan, Pamela W.; Graffagnino, Carmelo.

In: Evidence report/technology assessment, No. 202, 10.2011, p. 1-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Furlan, AD, Olson, DM, Bettger, JP, Alexander, KP, Kendrick, AS, Irvine, JR, Wing, L, Coeytaux, RR, Dolor, RJ, Duncan, PW & Graffagnino, C 2011, 'Transition of care for acute stroke and myocardial infarction patients: from hospitalization to rehabilitation, recovery, and secondary prevention.', Evidence report/technology assessment, no. 202, pp. 1-197.
Furlan, Andrea D. ; Olson, Daiwai M. ; Bettger, Janet Prvu ; Alexander, Karen P. ; Kendrick, Amy S. ; Irvine, Julian R. ; Wing, Liz ; Coeytaux, Remy R. ; Dolor, Rowena J. ; Duncan, Pamela W. ; Graffagnino, Carmelo. / Transition of care for acute stroke and myocardial infarction patients : from hospitalization to rehabilitation, recovery, and secondary prevention. In: Evidence report/technology assessment. 2011 ; No. 202. pp. 1-197.
@article{7f2ff48b2ffb4f02af754111f6825cdb,
title = "Transition of care for acute stroke and myocardial infarction patients: from hospitalization to rehabilitation, recovery, and secondary prevention.",
abstract = "To review the available published literature to assess whether evidence supports a beneficial role for coordinated transition of care services for the postacute care of patients hospitalized with first or recurrent stroke or myocardial infarction (MI). This review was framed around five areas of investigation: (1) key components of transition of care services, (2) evidence for improvement in functional outcomes, morbidity, mortality, and quality of life, (3) associated risks or potential harms, (4) evidence for improvement in systems of care, and (5) evidence that benefits and harms vary by patient-based or system-based characteristics. MEDLINE({\circledR}), CINAHL({\circledR}), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Embase({\circledR}). We included studies published in English from 2000 to 2011 that specified postacute hospitalization transition of care services as well as prevention of recurrent stroke or MI. A total of 62 articles representing 44 studies were included for data abstraction. Transition of care interventions were grouped into four categories: (1) hospital -initiated support for discharge was the initial stage in the transition of care process, (2) patient and family education interventions were started during hospitalization but were continued at the community level, (3) community-based models of support followed hospital discharge, and (4) chronic disease management models of care assumed the responsibility for long-term care. Early supported discharge after stroke was associated with reduced total hospital length of stay without adverse effects on functional recovery, and specialty care after MI was associated with reduced mortality. Because of several methodological shortcomings, most studies did not consistently demonstrate that any specific intervention resulted in improved patient-or system -based outcomes. Some studies included more than one intervention, which made it difficult to determine the effect of individual components on clinical outcomes. There was inconsistency in the definition of what constituted a component of transition of care compared to {"}standard care.{"} Standard care was poorly defined, and nearly all studies were underpowered to demonstrate a statistical benefit. The endpoints varied greatly from study to study. Nearly all the studies were single-site based, and most (26 of 44) were conducted in countries with national health care systems quite different from that of the U.S., therefore limiting their generalizability. Although a basis for the definition of transition of care exists, more consensus is needed on the definition of the interventions and the outcomes appropriate to those interventions. There was limited evidence that two components of hospital-initiated support for discharge (early supported discharge after stroke and specialty care followup after MI)were associated with beneficial effects. No other interventions had sufficient evidence of benefit based on the findings of this systematic review. The adoption of a standard set of definitions, a refinement in the methodology used to study transition of care, and appropriate selection of patient-centered and policy-relevant outcomes should be employed to draw valid conclusions pertaining to specific components of transition of care.",
author = "Furlan, {Andrea D.} and Olson, {Daiwai M.} and Bettger, {Janet Prvu} and Alexander, {Karen P.} and Kendrick, {Amy S.} and Irvine, {Julian R.} and Liz Wing and Coeytaux, {Remy R.} and Dolor, {Rowena J.} and Duncan, {Pamela W.} and Carmelo Graffagnino",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--197",
journal = "Evidence report/technology assessment",
issn = "1530-4396",
publisher = "Agency For Health Care Policy And Research",
number = "202",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transition of care for acute stroke and myocardial infarction patients

T2 - from hospitalization to rehabilitation, recovery, and secondary prevention.

AU - Furlan, Andrea D.

AU - Olson, Daiwai M.

AU - Bettger, Janet Prvu

AU - Alexander, Karen P.

AU - Kendrick, Amy S.

AU - Irvine, Julian R.

AU - Wing, Liz

AU - Coeytaux, Remy R.

AU - Dolor, Rowena J.

AU - Duncan, Pamela W.

AU - Graffagnino, Carmelo

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - To review the available published literature to assess whether evidence supports a beneficial role for coordinated transition of care services for the postacute care of patients hospitalized with first or recurrent stroke or myocardial infarction (MI). This review was framed around five areas of investigation: (1) key components of transition of care services, (2) evidence for improvement in functional outcomes, morbidity, mortality, and quality of life, (3) associated risks or potential harms, (4) evidence for improvement in systems of care, and (5) evidence that benefits and harms vary by patient-based or system-based characteristics. MEDLINE(®), CINAHL(®), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Embase(®). We included studies published in English from 2000 to 2011 that specified postacute hospitalization transition of care services as well as prevention of recurrent stroke or MI. A total of 62 articles representing 44 studies were included for data abstraction. Transition of care interventions were grouped into four categories: (1) hospital -initiated support for discharge was the initial stage in the transition of care process, (2) patient and family education interventions were started during hospitalization but were continued at the community level, (3) community-based models of support followed hospital discharge, and (4) chronic disease management models of care assumed the responsibility for long-term care. Early supported discharge after stroke was associated with reduced total hospital length of stay without adverse effects on functional recovery, and specialty care after MI was associated with reduced mortality. Because of several methodological shortcomings, most studies did not consistently demonstrate that any specific intervention resulted in improved patient-or system -based outcomes. Some studies included more than one intervention, which made it difficult to determine the effect of individual components on clinical outcomes. There was inconsistency in the definition of what constituted a component of transition of care compared to "standard care." Standard care was poorly defined, and nearly all studies were underpowered to demonstrate a statistical benefit. The endpoints varied greatly from study to study. Nearly all the studies were single-site based, and most (26 of 44) were conducted in countries with national health care systems quite different from that of the U.S., therefore limiting their generalizability. Although a basis for the definition of transition of care exists, more consensus is needed on the definition of the interventions and the outcomes appropriate to those interventions. There was limited evidence that two components of hospital-initiated support for discharge (early supported discharge after stroke and specialty care followup after MI)were associated with beneficial effects. No other interventions had sufficient evidence of benefit based on the findings of this systematic review. The adoption of a standard set of definitions, a refinement in the methodology used to study transition of care, and appropriate selection of patient-centered and policy-relevant outcomes should be employed to draw valid conclusions pertaining to specific components of transition of care.

AB - To review the available published literature to assess whether evidence supports a beneficial role for coordinated transition of care services for the postacute care of patients hospitalized with first or recurrent stroke or myocardial infarction (MI). This review was framed around five areas of investigation: (1) key components of transition of care services, (2) evidence for improvement in functional outcomes, morbidity, mortality, and quality of life, (3) associated risks or potential harms, (4) evidence for improvement in systems of care, and (5) evidence that benefits and harms vary by patient-based or system-based characteristics. MEDLINE(®), CINAHL(®), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Embase(®). We included studies published in English from 2000 to 2011 that specified postacute hospitalization transition of care services as well as prevention of recurrent stroke or MI. A total of 62 articles representing 44 studies were included for data abstraction. Transition of care interventions were grouped into four categories: (1) hospital -initiated support for discharge was the initial stage in the transition of care process, (2) patient and family education interventions were started during hospitalization but were continued at the community level, (3) community-based models of support followed hospital discharge, and (4) chronic disease management models of care assumed the responsibility for long-term care. Early supported discharge after stroke was associated with reduced total hospital length of stay without adverse effects on functional recovery, and specialty care after MI was associated with reduced mortality. Because of several methodological shortcomings, most studies did not consistently demonstrate that any specific intervention resulted in improved patient-or system -based outcomes. Some studies included more than one intervention, which made it difficult to determine the effect of individual components on clinical outcomes. There was inconsistency in the definition of what constituted a component of transition of care compared to "standard care." Standard care was poorly defined, and nearly all studies were underpowered to demonstrate a statistical benefit. The endpoints varied greatly from study to study. Nearly all the studies were single-site based, and most (26 of 44) were conducted in countries with national health care systems quite different from that of the U.S., therefore limiting their generalizability. Although a basis for the definition of transition of care exists, more consensus is needed on the definition of the interventions and the outcomes appropriate to those interventions. There was limited evidence that two components of hospital-initiated support for discharge (early supported discharge after stroke and specialty care followup after MI)were associated with beneficial effects. No other interventions had sufficient evidence of benefit based on the findings of this systematic review. The adoption of a standard set of definitions, a refinement in the methodology used to study transition of care, and appropriate selection of patient-centered and policy-relevant outcomes should be employed to draw valid conclusions pertaining to specific components of transition of care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872793573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872793573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 197

JO - Evidence report/technology assessment

JF - Evidence report/technology assessment

SN - 1530-4396

IS - 202

ER -