Transrectal versus transvaginal abscess drainage: Survey of patient tolerance and effect on activities on daily living

David M. Hovseplan, Joseph R. Steele, Celette Sugg Skinner, Eric S. Malden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient perception of pain related to transrectal and transvaginal drainage and the catheter's effect on activities of daily living. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1993 to August 1997, 22 male and 40 female patients (mean age, 41 years; age range, 4-80 years) underwent transrectal or transvaginal aspiration or drainage. Fifty-seven drainages were performed. In a follow-up survey, patients were asked to score pain experienced during the procedure and afterward on a scale of 1-10 and to rate the effect of the catheter on their activities of daily living. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients participated in the telephone survey. For those able to recall the insertion procedure, the mean pain score was 3.2 for transrectal and 5.9 for transvaginal drainage. Mean indwelling catheter pain was 1.6 for transrectal and 4.8 for transvaginal drainage. Pain after removal was 1.4 for transrectal and 2.3 for transvaginal drainage. Only one patient with a transrectal catheter reported severe limitation (bowel movement), with no reports of any serious effect on urinating, bathing, sitting, or walking. Transvaginally placed catheters caused marked limitation in all categories and were more painful than transrectal catheters (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Of the transrectal and transvaginal approaches, transrectal is better tolerated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-163
Number of pages5
JournalRadiology
Volume212
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 1999

Fingerprint

Activities of Daily Living
Abscess
Drainage
Catheters
Pain
Pain Perception
Indwelling Catheters
Telephone
Walking
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Abscess, drainage
  • Abscess, US
  • Interventional procedures
  • Pelvic organs, abscess
  • Pelvic organs, interventional procedures
  • Pelvic organs, US

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Transrectal versus transvaginal abscess drainage : Survey of patient tolerance and effect on activities on daily living. / Hovseplan, David M.; Steele, Joseph R.; Skinner, Celette Sugg; Malden, Eric S.

In: Radiology, Vol. 212, No. 1, 07.1999, p. 159-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hovseplan, David M. ; Steele, Joseph R. ; Skinner, Celette Sugg ; Malden, Eric S. / Transrectal versus transvaginal abscess drainage : Survey of patient tolerance and effect on activities on daily living. In: Radiology. 1999 ; Vol. 212, No. 1. pp. 159-163.
@article{d65e7d5c39f04fd28e5a1e9ef0d5e182,
title = "Transrectal versus transvaginal abscess drainage: Survey of patient tolerance and effect on activities on daily living",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate patient perception of pain related to transrectal and transvaginal drainage and the catheter's effect on activities of daily living. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1993 to August 1997, 22 male and 40 female patients (mean age, 41 years; age range, 4-80 years) underwent transrectal or transvaginal aspiration or drainage. Fifty-seven drainages were performed. In a follow-up survey, patients were asked to score pain experienced during the procedure and afterward on a scale of 1-10 and to rate the effect of the catheter on their activities of daily living. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients participated in the telephone survey. For those able to recall the insertion procedure, the mean pain score was 3.2 for transrectal and 5.9 for transvaginal drainage. Mean indwelling catheter pain was 1.6 for transrectal and 4.8 for transvaginal drainage. Pain after removal was 1.4 for transrectal and 2.3 for transvaginal drainage. Only one patient with a transrectal catheter reported severe limitation (bowel movement), with no reports of any serious effect on urinating, bathing, sitting, or walking. Transvaginally placed catheters caused marked limitation in all categories and were more painful than transrectal catheters (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Of the transrectal and transvaginal approaches, transrectal is better tolerated.",
keywords = "Abscess, drainage, Abscess, US, Interventional procedures, Pelvic organs, abscess, Pelvic organs, interventional procedures, Pelvic organs, US",
author = "Hovseplan, {David M.} and Steele, {Joseph R.} and Skinner, {Celette Sugg} and Malden, {Eric S.}",
year = "1999",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "212",
pages = "159--163",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transrectal versus transvaginal abscess drainage

T2 - Survey of patient tolerance and effect on activities on daily living

AU - Hovseplan, David M.

AU - Steele, Joseph R.

AU - Skinner, Celette Sugg

AU - Malden, Eric S.

PY - 1999/7

Y1 - 1999/7

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate patient perception of pain related to transrectal and transvaginal drainage and the catheter's effect on activities of daily living. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1993 to August 1997, 22 male and 40 female patients (mean age, 41 years; age range, 4-80 years) underwent transrectal or transvaginal aspiration or drainage. Fifty-seven drainages were performed. In a follow-up survey, patients were asked to score pain experienced during the procedure and afterward on a scale of 1-10 and to rate the effect of the catheter on their activities of daily living. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients participated in the telephone survey. For those able to recall the insertion procedure, the mean pain score was 3.2 for transrectal and 5.9 for transvaginal drainage. Mean indwelling catheter pain was 1.6 for transrectal and 4.8 for transvaginal drainage. Pain after removal was 1.4 for transrectal and 2.3 for transvaginal drainage. Only one patient with a transrectal catheter reported severe limitation (bowel movement), with no reports of any serious effect on urinating, bathing, sitting, or walking. Transvaginally placed catheters caused marked limitation in all categories and were more painful than transrectal catheters (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Of the transrectal and transvaginal approaches, transrectal is better tolerated.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate patient perception of pain related to transrectal and transvaginal drainage and the catheter's effect on activities of daily living. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1993 to August 1997, 22 male and 40 female patients (mean age, 41 years; age range, 4-80 years) underwent transrectal or transvaginal aspiration or drainage. Fifty-seven drainages were performed. In a follow-up survey, patients were asked to score pain experienced during the procedure and afterward on a scale of 1-10 and to rate the effect of the catheter on their activities of daily living. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients participated in the telephone survey. For those able to recall the insertion procedure, the mean pain score was 3.2 for transrectal and 5.9 for transvaginal drainage. Mean indwelling catheter pain was 1.6 for transrectal and 4.8 for transvaginal drainage. Pain after removal was 1.4 for transrectal and 2.3 for transvaginal drainage. Only one patient with a transrectal catheter reported severe limitation (bowel movement), with no reports of any serious effect on urinating, bathing, sitting, or walking. Transvaginally placed catheters caused marked limitation in all categories and were more painful than transrectal catheters (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Of the transrectal and transvaginal approaches, transrectal is better tolerated.

KW - Abscess, drainage

KW - Abscess, US

KW - Interventional procedures

KW - Pelvic organs, abscess

KW - Pelvic organs, interventional procedures

KW - Pelvic organs, US

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032967651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032967651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10405736

AN - SCOPUS:0032967651

VL - 212

SP - 159

EP - 163

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 1

ER -