Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients: A one-year prospective study

Robert J. Gatchel, Peter B. Polatin, Carl Noe, Margaret Gardea, Carla Pulliam, Judy Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

152 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In an attempt to prevent acute low-back pain from becoming a chronic disability problem, an earlier study developed a statistical algorithm which accurately identified those acute low-back pain patients who were at high risk for developing such chronicity. The major goal of the present study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of employing an early intervention program with these high-risk patients in order to prevent the development of chronic disability at a 1-year follow-up. Approximately 700 acute low-back pain patients were screened for their high-risk versus low-risk status. On the basis of this screening, highrisk patients were then randomly assigned to one of two groups: a functional restoration early intervention group (n = 22), or a nonintervention group (n = 48). A group of low-risk subjects (n = 54) who did not receive any early intervention was also evaluated. All these subjects were prospectively tracked at 3-month intervals starting from the date of their initial evaluation, culminating in a 12-month follow-up. During these follow-up evaluations, pain disability and socioeconomic outcomes (such as return-to-work and healthcare utilization) were assessed. Results clearly indicated that the high-risk subjects who received early intervention displayed statistically significant fewer indices of chronic pain disability on a wide range of work, healthcare utilization, medication use, and self-report pain variables, relative to the high-risk subjects who do not receive such early intervention. In addition, the high-risk nonintervention group displayed significantly more symptoms of chronic pain disability on these variables relative to the initially low-risk subjects. Cost-comparison savings data were also evaluated. These data revealed that there were greater cost savings associated with the early intervention group versus the no early intervention group. The overall results of this study clearly demonstrate the treatment- and cost-effectiveness of an early intervention program for acute low-back pain patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2003

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Health Care Costs
Cost-Benefit Analysis
pain
Prospective Studies
costs
disability
Group
Cost Savings
Chronic Pain
savings
utilization
Disability Evaluation
Delivery of Health Care
Pain
Return to Work
evaluation
Self Report
restoration
medication

Keywords

  • Acute low-back pain
  • Cost effectiveness
  • Early intervention
  • Functional restoration
  • Treatment effectiveness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients : A one-year prospective study. / Gatchel, Robert J.; Polatin, Peter B.; Noe, Carl; Gardea, Margaret; Pulliam, Carla; Thompson, Judy.

In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 13, No. 1, 03.2003, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gatchel, Robert J. ; Polatin, Peter B. ; Noe, Carl ; Gardea, Margaret ; Pulliam, Carla ; Thompson, Judy. / Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients : A one-year prospective study. In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2003 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 1-9.
@article{b0525b718a3242fea44cad09938abf9e,
title = "Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients: A one-year prospective study",
abstract = "In an attempt to prevent acute low-back pain from becoming a chronic disability problem, an earlier study developed a statistical algorithm which accurately identified those acute low-back pain patients who were at high risk for developing such chronicity. The major goal of the present study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of employing an early intervention program with these high-risk patients in order to prevent the development of chronic disability at a 1-year follow-up. Approximately 700 acute low-back pain patients were screened for their high-risk versus low-risk status. On the basis of this screening, highrisk patients were then randomly assigned to one of two groups: a functional restoration early intervention group (n = 22), or a nonintervention group (n = 48). A group of low-risk subjects (n = 54) who did not receive any early intervention was also evaluated. All these subjects were prospectively tracked at 3-month intervals starting from the date of their initial evaluation, culminating in a 12-month follow-up. During these follow-up evaluations, pain disability and socioeconomic outcomes (such as return-to-work and healthcare utilization) were assessed. Results clearly indicated that the high-risk subjects who received early intervention displayed statistically significant fewer indices of chronic pain disability on a wide range of work, healthcare utilization, medication use, and self-report pain variables, relative to the high-risk subjects who do not receive such early intervention. In addition, the high-risk nonintervention group displayed significantly more symptoms of chronic pain disability on these variables relative to the initially low-risk subjects. Cost-comparison savings data were also evaluated. These data revealed that there were greater cost savings associated with the early intervention group versus the no early intervention group. The overall results of this study clearly demonstrate the treatment- and cost-effectiveness of an early intervention program for acute low-back pain patients.",
keywords = "Acute low-back pain, Cost effectiveness, Early intervention, Functional restoration, Treatment effectiveness",
author = "Gatchel, {Robert J.} and Polatin, {Peter B.} and Carl Noe and Margaret Gardea and Carla Pulliam and Judy Thompson",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1023/A:1021823505774",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-0487",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients

T2 - A one-year prospective study

AU - Gatchel, Robert J.

AU - Polatin, Peter B.

AU - Noe, Carl

AU - Gardea, Margaret

AU - Pulliam, Carla

AU - Thompson, Judy

PY - 2003/3

Y1 - 2003/3

N2 - In an attempt to prevent acute low-back pain from becoming a chronic disability problem, an earlier study developed a statistical algorithm which accurately identified those acute low-back pain patients who were at high risk for developing such chronicity. The major goal of the present study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of employing an early intervention program with these high-risk patients in order to prevent the development of chronic disability at a 1-year follow-up. Approximately 700 acute low-back pain patients were screened for their high-risk versus low-risk status. On the basis of this screening, highrisk patients were then randomly assigned to one of two groups: a functional restoration early intervention group (n = 22), or a nonintervention group (n = 48). A group of low-risk subjects (n = 54) who did not receive any early intervention was also evaluated. All these subjects were prospectively tracked at 3-month intervals starting from the date of their initial evaluation, culminating in a 12-month follow-up. During these follow-up evaluations, pain disability and socioeconomic outcomes (such as return-to-work and healthcare utilization) were assessed. Results clearly indicated that the high-risk subjects who received early intervention displayed statistically significant fewer indices of chronic pain disability on a wide range of work, healthcare utilization, medication use, and self-report pain variables, relative to the high-risk subjects who do not receive such early intervention. In addition, the high-risk nonintervention group displayed significantly more symptoms of chronic pain disability on these variables relative to the initially low-risk subjects. Cost-comparison savings data were also evaluated. These data revealed that there were greater cost savings associated with the early intervention group versus the no early intervention group. The overall results of this study clearly demonstrate the treatment- and cost-effectiveness of an early intervention program for acute low-back pain patients.

AB - In an attempt to prevent acute low-back pain from becoming a chronic disability problem, an earlier study developed a statistical algorithm which accurately identified those acute low-back pain patients who were at high risk for developing such chronicity. The major goal of the present study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of employing an early intervention program with these high-risk patients in order to prevent the development of chronic disability at a 1-year follow-up. Approximately 700 acute low-back pain patients were screened for their high-risk versus low-risk status. On the basis of this screening, highrisk patients were then randomly assigned to one of two groups: a functional restoration early intervention group (n = 22), or a nonintervention group (n = 48). A group of low-risk subjects (n = 54) who did not receive any early intervention was also evaluated. All these subjects were prospectively tracked at 3-month intervals starting from the date of their initial evaluation, culminating in a 12-month follow-up. During these follow-up evaluations, pain disability and socioeconomic outcomes (such as return-to-work and healthcare utilization) were assessed. Results clearly indicated that the high-risk subjects who received early intervention displayed statistically significant fewer indices of chronic pain disability on a wide range of work, healthcare utilization, medication use, and self-report pain variables, relative to the high-risk subjects who do not receive such early intervention. In addition, the high-risk nonintervention group displayed significantly more symptoms of chronic pain disability on these variables relative to the initially low-risk subjects. Cost-comparison savings data were also evaluated. These data revealed that there were greater cost savings associated with the early intervention group versus the no early intervention group. The overall results of this study clearly demonstrate the treatment- and cost-effectiveness of an early intervention program for acute low-back pain patients.

KW - Acute low-back pain

KW - Cost effectiveness

KW - Early intervention

KW - Functional restoration

KW - Treatment effectiveness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037617731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037617731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1021823505774

DO - 10.1023/A:1021823505774

M3 - Article

C2 - 12611026

AN - SCOPUS:0037617731

VL - 13

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-0487

IS - 1

ER -