Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers: Threshold contouring and lesion volumes

Eric C. Ford, Paul E. Kinahan, Lorraine Hanlon, Adam Alessio, Joseph Rajendran, David L. Schwartz, Mark Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Tumor boundary delineation using positron emission tomography (PET) is a promising tool for radiation therapy applications. In this study we quantify the uncertainties in tumor boundary delineation as a function of the reconstruction method, smoothing, and lesion size in head and neck cancer patients using FDG-PET images and evaluate the dosimetric impact on radiotherapy plans. FDG-PET images were acquired for eight patients with a GE Advance PET scanner. In addition, a 20 cm diameter cylindrical phantom with six FDG-filled spheres with volumes of 1.2 to 26.5 cm3 was imaged. PET emission scans were reconstructed with the OSEM and FBP algorithms with different smoothing parameters. PET-based tumor regions were delineated using an automatic contouring function set at progressively higher threshold contour levels and the resulting volumes were calculated. CT-based tumor volumes were also contoured by a physician on coregistered PETCT patient images. The intensity value of the threshold contour level that returns 100% of the actual volume, IV100, was measured. We generated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for an example head and neck patient, treating 66 Gy to CT-based gross disease and 54 Gy to nodal regions at risk, followed by a boost to the FDG-PET-based tumor. The volumes of PET-based tumors are a sensitive function of threshold contour level for all patients and phantom datasets. A 5% change in threshold contour level can translate into a 200% increase in volume. Phantom data indicate that IV100 can be set as a fraction, f, of the maximum measured uptake. Fractional threshold values in the cylindrical water phantom range from 0.23 to 0.51. Both the fractional threshold and the threshold-volume curve are dependent on lesion size, with lesions smaller than approximately 5 cm3 displaying a more pronounced sensitivity and larger fractional threshold values. The threshold-volume curves and fractional threshold values also depend on the reconstruction algorithm and smoothing filter with more smoothing requiring a higher fractional threshold contour level. The threshold contour level affects the tumor size, and therefore the ultimate boost dose that is achievable with IMRT. In an example head and neck IMRT plan, the D95 of the planning target volume decreased from 7770 to 7230 cGy for 42% vs 55% contour threshold levels. PET-based tumor volumes are strongly affected by the choice of threshold level. This can have a significant dosimetric impact. The appropriate threshold level depends on lesion size and image reconstruction parameters. These effects should be carefully considered when using PET contour andor volume information for radiotherapy applications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4280-4288
Number of pages9
JournalMedical Physics
Volume33
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Head and Neck Neoplasms
Positron-Emission Tomography
Neoplasms
Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy
Tumor Burden
Neck
Head
Computer-Assisted Image Processing
Uncertainty
Physicians
Water

Keywords

  • F-FDG
  • Head and neck cancer
  • PET
  • Radiotherapy
  • Target volume
  • Thresholding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Ford, E. C., Kinahan, P. E., Hanlon, L., Alessio, A., Rajendran, J., Schwartz, D. L., & Phillips, M. (2006). Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers: Threshold contouring and lesion volumes. Medical Physics, 33(11), 4280-4288. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2361076

Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers : Threshold contouring and lesion volumes. / Ford, Eric C.; Kinahan, Paul E.; Hanlon, Lorraine; Alessio, Adam; Rajendran, Joseph; Schwartz, David L.; Phillips, Mark.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 33, No. 11, 2006, p. 4280-4288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ford, EC, Kinahan, PE, Hanlon, L, Alessio, A, Rajendran, J, Schwartz, DL & Phillips, M 2006, 'Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers: Threshold contouring and lesion volumes', Medical Physics, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 4280-4288. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2361076
Ford, Eric C. ; Kinahan, Paul E. ; Hanlon, Lorraine ; Alessio, Adam ; Rajendran, Joseph ; Schwartz, David L. ; Phillips, Mark. / Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers : Threshold contouring and lesion volumes. In: Medical Physics. 2006 ; Vol. 33, No. 11. pp. 4280-4288.
@article{c196c60189c94455a4a8309d5bc4ca85,
title = "Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers: Threshold contouring and lesion volumes",
abstract = "Tumor boundary delineation using positron emission tomography (PET) is a promising tool for radiation therapy applications. In this study we quantify the uncertainties in tumor boundary delineation as a function of the reconstruction method, smoothing, and lesion size in head and neck cancer patients using FDG-PET images and evaluate the dosimetric impact on radiotherapy plans. FDG-PET images were acquired for eight patients with a GE Advance PET scanner. In addition, a 20 cm diameter cylindrical phantom with six FDG-filled spheres with volumes of 1.2 to 26.5 cm3 was imaged. PET emission scans were reconstructed with the OSEM and FBP algorithms with different smoothing parameters. PET-based tumor regions were delineated using an automatic contouring function set at progressively higher threshold contour levels and the resulting volumes were calculated. CT-based tumor volumes were also contoured by a physician on coregistered PETCT patient images. The intensity value of the threshold contour level that returns 100{\%} of the actual volume, IV100, was measured. We generated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for an example head and neck patient, treating 66 Gy to CT-based gross disease and 54 Gy to nodal regions at risk, followed by a boost to the FDG-PET-based tumor. The volumes of PET-based tumors are a sensitive function of threshold contour level for all patients and phantom datasets. A 5{\%} change in threshold contour level can translate into a 200{\%} increase in volume. Phantom data indicate that IV100 can be set as a fraction, f, of the maximum measured uptake. Fractional threshold values in the cylindrical water phantom range from 0.23 to 0.51. Both the fractional threshold and the threshold-volume curve are dependent on lesion size, with lesions smaller than approximately 5 cm3 displaying a more pronounced sensitivity and larger fractional threshold values. The threshold-volume curves and fractional threshold values also depend on the reconstruction algorithm and smoothing filter with more smoothing requiring a higher fractional threshold contour level. The threshold contour level affects the tumor size, and therefore the ultimate boost dose that is achievable with IMRT. In an example head and neck IMRT plan, the D95 of the planning target volume decreased from 7770 to 7230 cGy for 42{\%} vs 55{\%} contour threshold levels. PET-based tumor volumes are strongly affected by the choice of threshold level. This can have a significant dosimetric impact. The appropriate threshold level depends on lesion size and image reconstruction parameters. These effects should be carefully considered when using PET contour andor volume information for radiotherapy applications.",
keywords = "F-FDG, Head and neck cancer, PET, Radiotherapy, Target volume, Thresholding",
author = "Ford, {Eric C.} and Kinahan, {Paul E.} and Lorraine Hanlon and Adam Alessio and Joseph Rajendran and Schwartz, {David L.} and Mark Phillips",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1118/1.2361076",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "4280--4288",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers

T2 - Threshold contouring and lesion volumes

AU - Ford, Eric C.

AU - Kinahan, Paul E.

AU - Hanlon, Lorraine

AU - Alessio, Adam

AU - Rajendran, Joseph

AU - Schwartz, David L.

AU - Phillips, Mark

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Tumor boundary delineation using positron emission tomography (PET) is a promising tool for radiation therapy applications. In this study we quantify the uncertainties in tumor boundary delineation as a function of the reconstruction method, smoothing, and lesion size in head and neck cancer patients using FDG-PET images and evaluate the dosimetric impact on radiotherapy plans. FDG-PET images were acquired for eight patients with a GE Advance PET scanner. In addition, a 20 cm diameter cylindrical phantom with six FDG-filled spheres with volumes of 1.2 to 26.5 cm3 was imaged. PET emission scans were reconstructed with the OSEM and FBP algorithms with different smoothing parameters. PET-based tumor regions were delineated using an automatic contouring function set at progressively higher threshold contour levels and the resulting volumes were calculated. CT-based tumor volumes were also contoured by a physician on coregistered PETCT patient images. The intensity value of the threshold contour level that returns 100% of the actual volume, IV100, was measured. We generated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for an example head and neck patient, treating 66 Gy to CT-based gross disease and 54 Gy to nodal regions at risk, followed by a boost to the FDG-PET-based tumor. The volumes of PET-based tumors are a sensitive function of threshold contour level for all patients and phantom datasets. A 5% change in threshold contour level can translate into a 200% increase in volume. Phantom data indicate that IV100 can be set as a fraction, f, of the maximum measured uptake. Fractional threshold values in the cylindrical water phantom range from 0.23 to 0.51. Both the fractional threshold and the threshold-volume curve are dependent on lesion size, with lesions smaller than approximately 5 cm3 displaying a more pronounced sensitivity and larger fractional threshold values. The threshold-volume curves and fractional threshold values also depend on the reconstruction algorithm and smoothing filter with more smoothing requiring a higher fractional threshold contour level. The threshold contour level affects the tumor size, and therefore the ultimate boost dose that is achievable with IMRT. In an example head and neck IMRT plan, the D95 of the planning target volume decreased from 7770 to 7230 cGy for 42% vs 55% contour threshold levels. PET-based tumor volumes are strongly affected by the choice of threshold level. This can have a significant dosimetric impact. The appropriate threshold level depends on lesion size and image reconstruction parameters. These effects should be carefully considered when using PET contour andor volume information for radiotherapy applications.

AB - Tumor boundary delineation using positron emission tomography (PET) is a promising tool for radiation therapy applications. In this study we quantify the uncertainties in tumor boundary delineation as a function of the reconstruction method, smoothing, and lesion size in head and neck cancer patients using FDG-PET images and evaluate the dosimetric impact on radiotherapy plans. FDG-PET images were acquired for eight patients with a GE Advance PET scanner. In addition, a 20 cm diameter cylindrical phantom with six FDG-filled spheres with volumes of 1.2 to 26.5 cm3 was imaged. PET emission scans were reconstructed with the OSEM and FBP algorithms with different smoothing parameters. PET-based tumor regions were delineated using an automatic contouring function set at progressively higher threshold contour levels and the resulting volumes were calculated. CT-based tumor volumes were also contoured by a physician on coregistered PETCT patient images. The intensity value of the threshold contour level that returns 100% of the actual volume, IV100, was measured. We generated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for an example head and neck patient, treating 66 Gy to CT-based gross disease and 54 Gy to nodal regions at risk, followed by a boost to the FDG-PET-based tumor. The volumes of PET-based tumors are a sensitive function of threshold contour level for all patients and phantom datasets. A 5% change in threshold contour level can translate into a 200% increase in volume. Phantom data indicate that IV100 can be set as a fraction, f, of the maximum measured uptake. Fractional threshold values in the cylindrical water phantom range from 0.23 to 0.51. Both the fractional threshold and the threshold-volume curve are dependent on lesion size, with lesions smaller than approximately 5 cm3 displaying a more pronounced sensitivity and larger fractional threshold values. The threshold-volume curves and fractional threshold values also depend on the reconstruction algorithm and smoothing filter with more smoothing requiring a higher fractional threshold contour level. The threshold contour level affects the tumor size, and therefore the ultimate boost dose that is achievable with IMRT. In an example head and neck IMRT plan, the D95 of the planning target volume decreased from 7770 to 7230 cGy for 42% vs 55% contour threshold levels. PET-based tumor volumes are strongly affected by the choice of threshold level. This can have a significant dosimetric impact. The appropriate threshold level depends on lesion size and image reconstruction parameters. These effects should be carefully considered when using PET contour andor volume information for radiotherapy applications.

KW - F-FDG

KW - Head and neck cancer

KW - PET

KW - Radiotherapy

KW - Target volume

KW - Thresholding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750536459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750536459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2361076

DO - 10.1118/1.2361076

M3 - Article

C2 - 17153406

AN - SCOPUS:33750536459

VL - 33

SP - 4280

EP - 4288

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 11

ER -