Ultrasound anthropometric reliability

T. W. Harstad, P. H. Buschang, B. B. Little, R. Santos-Ramos, D. Twickler, C. E L Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Method errors and reliabilities were estimated for seven sonographic measurements in pregnancies of 106 women examined between January and July 1989. Teams of two experienced sonographers replicated the following measurements: biparietal diameter (BPD), occipital-frontal diameter (OFD), anterior-posterior diameter (APD), transabdominal distance (TAD), and femur diaphysis length (FDL). Multilevel modeling procedures were used to estimate the variance components. Significant (p < 0.01) covariates in the fixed part of the model included an increase in error with greater parity, estimated menstrual age (EMA), and maternal abdominal wall thickness (taken at the umbilicus). Intraobserver reliability ranged from 85.2% (AC) to 99.3% (FDL); interobserver reliability ranged from 80.8% (TAD) to 92.4% (FDL). Method errors, describing the expected error for 68% of the measurements taken, ranged from 0.8 mm to 7.7 mm (intraobserver) and from 1.2 mm to 7.8 mm (interobserver). These results suggest that large error components should be considered in the interpretation of the reliability of ultrasonographically obtained measurements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-534
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical Ultrasound
Volume22
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Diaphyses
Femur
femur
Umbilicus
Maternal Age
Abdominal Wall
Parity
pregnancy
Pregnancy
alternating current
parity
estimates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Harstad, T. W., Buschang, P. H., Little, B. B., Santos-Ramos, R., Twickler, D., & Brown, C. E. L. (1994). Ultrasound anthropometric reliability. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 22(9), 531-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870220903

Ultrasound anthropometric reliability. / Harstad, T. W.; Buschang, P. H.; Little, B. B.; Santos-Ramos, R.; Twickler, D.; Brown, C. E L.

In: Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, Vol. 22, No. 9, 1994, p. 531-534.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harstad, TW, Buschang, PH, Little, BB, Santos-Ramos, R, Twickler, D & Brown, CEL 1994, 'Ultrasound anthropometric reliability', Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 531-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870220903
Harstad TW, Buschang PH, Little BB, Santos-Ramos R, Twickler D, Brown CEL. Ultrasound anthropometric reliability. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 1994;22(9):531-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870220903
Harstad, T. W. ; Buschang, P. H. ; Little, B. B. ; Santos-Ramos, R. ; Twickler, D. ; Brown, C. E L. / Ultrasound anthropometric reliability. In: Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 1994 ; Vol. 22, No. 9. pp. 531-534.
@article{51f4b54bb5d242579ca79752464c2d92,
title = "Ultrasound anthropometric reliability",
abstract = "Method errors and reliabilities were estimated for seven sonographic measurements in pregnancies of 106 women examined between January and July 1989. Teams of two experienced sonographers replicated the following measurements: biparietal diameter (BPD), occipital-frontal diameter (OFD), anterior-posterior diameter (APD), transabdominal distance (TAD), and femur diaphysis length (FDL). Multilevel modeling procedures were used to estimate the variance components. Significant (p < 0.01) covariates in the fixed part of the model included an increase in error with greater parity, estimated menstrual age (EMA), and maternal abdominal wall thickness (taken at the umbilicus). Intraobserver reliability ranged from 85.2{\%} (AC) to 99.3{\%} (FDL); interobserver reliability ranged from 80.8{\%} (TAD) to 92.4{\%} (FDL). Method errors, describing the expected error for 68{\%} of the measurements taken, ranged from 0.8 mm to 7.7 mm (intraobserver) and from 1.2 mm to 7.8 mm (interobserver). These results suggest that large error components should be considered in the interpretation of the reliability of ultrasonographically obtained measurements.",
author = "Harstad, {T. W.} and Buschang, {P. H.} and Little, {B. B.} and R. Santos-Ramos and D. Twickler and Brown, {C. E L}",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1002/jcu.1870220903",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "531--534",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Ultrasound",
issn = "0091-2751",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasound anthropometric reliability

AU - Harstad, T. W.

AU - Buschang, P. H.

AU - Little, B. B.

AU - Santos-Ramos, R.

AU - Twickler, D.

AU - Brown, C. E L

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Method errors and reliabilities were estimated for seven sonographic measurements in pregnancies of 106 women examined between January and July 1989. Teams of two experienced sonographers replicated the following measurements: biparietal diameter (BPD), occipital-frontal diameter (OFD), anterior-posterior diameter (APD), transabdominal distance (TAD), and femur diaphysis length (FDL). Multilevel modeling procedures were used to estimate the variance components. Significant (p < 0.01) covariates in the fixed part of the model included an increase in error with greater parity, estimated menstrual age (EMA), and maternal abdominal wall thickness (taken at the umbilicus). Intraobserver reliability ranged from 85.2% (AC) to 99.3% (FDL); interobserver reliability ranged from 80.8% (TAD) to 92.4% (FDL). Method errors, describing the expected error for 68% of the measurements taken, ranged from 0.8 mm to 7.7 mm (intraobserver) and from 1.2 mm to 7.8 mm (interobserver). These results suggest that large error components should be considered in the interpretation of the reliability of ultrasonographically obtained measurements.

AB - Method errors and reliabilities were estimated for seven sonographic measurements in pregnancies of 106 women examined between January and July 1989. Teams of two experienced sonographers replicated the following measurements: biparietal diameter (BPD), occipital-frontal diameter (OFD), anterior-posterior diameter (APD), transabdominal distance (TAD), and femur diaphysis length (FDL). Multilevel modeling procedures were used to estimate the variance components. Significant (p < 0.01) covariates in the fixed part of the model included an increase in error with greater parity, estimated menstrual age (EMA), and maternal abdominal wall thickness (taken at the umbilicus). Intraobserver reliability ranged from 85.2% (AC) to 99.3% (FDL); interobserver reliability ranged from 80.8% (TAD) to 92.4% (FDL). Method errors, describing the expected error for 68% of the measurements taken, ranged from 0.8 mm to 7.7 mm (intraobserver) and from 1.2 mm to 7.8 mm (interobserver). These results suggest that large error components should be considered in the interpretation of the reliability of ultrasonographically obtained measurements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028061673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028061673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jcu.1870220903

DO - 10.1002/jcu.1870220903

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 531

EP - 534

JO - Journal of Clinical Ultrasound

JF - Journal of Clinical Ultrasound

SN - 0091-2751

IS - 9

ER -