Update on evidence-based reviews with recommendations in adult chronic rhinosinusitis

Richard R. Orlandi, Timothy L. Smith, Bradley F. Marple, Richard J. Harvey, Peter H. Hwang, Robert C. Kern, Todd T. Kingdom, Amber Luong, Luke Rudmik, Brent A. Senior, Elina Toskala, David W. Kennedy

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has a significant impact not only on individuals who are afflicted but also on society as a whole. An increasing emphasis is being placed on incorporating the best available evidence into the care of patients, in association with an individual clinician's expertise and the patient's values. Recent evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs) have distilled our knowledge of CRS treatment options and have also pointed out continued gaps in this knowledge. This review synthesizes the findings of 8 EBRRs regarding CRS published in the International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology between 2011 and 2014. The recommendations in this review are based on the best available evidence and are meant to be incorporated into each patient's individual care, along with the practitioner's expertise and the individual patient's values and expectations. It is hoped that the EBRRs, and the process that spawned them, can provide the foundation for future guidelines in the diagnosis and management of CRS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S1-S15
JournalInternational Forum of Allergy and Rhinology
Volume4
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Keywords

  • CRS
  • Chronic rhinosinusitis
  • EBM
  • EBRR
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Evidence-based review with recommendation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Update on evidence-based reviews with recommendations in adult chronic rhinosinusitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this