Ureteroureterostomy via Inguinal Incision for Ectopic Ureters and Ureteroceles Without Ipsilateral Lower Pole Reflux

Juan Prieto, Ali Ziada, Linda Baker, Warren Snodgrass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We report outcomes from ureteroureterostomy performed through an inguinal herniorrhaphy type incision for definitive management of ectopic ureters or ureteroceles in the absence of ipsilateral lower pole reflux. Materials and Methods: Records were reviewed for 23 consecutive patients who underwent lower ureteroureterostomy for 26 duplicated systems with ectopic ureter or ureterocele and no ipsilateral lower pole reflux. In 21 patients surgery was performed through an inguinal incision similar to that for herniorrhaphy, while a Pfannenstiel incision was used initially in the series in 2 others with bilateral duplex systems. Median patient age at operation was 10 months (range 2 to 56). Results: At a mean followup of 26 months preoperative upper pole hydronephrosis and distal upper ureteral dilatation had resolved or improved in all cases. Preliminary cutaneous ureterostomy was performed on 4 ureters (3 patients), 2 because the recipient lower pole ureter was thought to be too small for incision and anastomosis, 1 because of purulent drainage and 1 following inadvertent transection of the lower pole ureter. Mean surgical time for inguinal ureteroureterostomy was 101 minutes and mean postoperative hospitalization was 0.6 days. Except for dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection in 1 patient with symptomatic grade I ipsilateral lower pole reflux, no additional surgical procedures were performed after ureteroureterostomy. Conclusions: Lower ureteroureterostomy offers potentially definitive treatment for ectopic ureter or ureterocele without ipsilateral lower pole reflux, and can be performed through an inguinal herniorrhaphy type incision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1844-1850
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume181
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

Ureterocele
Groin
Ureter
Herniorrhaphy
Ureterostomy
Hydronephrosis
Hyaluronic Acid
Operative Time
Dilatation
Drainage
Hospitalization
Skin
Injections

Keywords

  • replantation
  • ureteral obstruction
  • ureterocele
  • ureterostomy
  • urologic surgical procedures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Ureteroureterostomy via Inguinal Incision for Ectopic Ureters and Ureteroceles Without Ipsilateral Lower Pole Reflux. / Prieto, Juan; Ziada, Ali; Baker, Linda; Snodgrass, Warren.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 181, No. 4, 04.2009, p. 1844-1850.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{36cf8d6457674a7bb25313b15143ff5e,
title = "Ureteroureterostomy via Inguinal Incision for Ectopic Ureters and Ureteroceles Without Ipsilateral Lower Pole Reflux",
abstract = "Purpose: We report outcomes from ureteroureterostomy performed through an inguinal herniorrhaphy type incision for definitive management of ectopic ureters or ureteroceles in the absence of ipsilateral lower pole reflux. Materials and Methods: Records were reviewed for 23 consecutive patients who underwent lower ureteroureterostomy for 26 duplicated systems with ectopic ureter or ureterocele and no ipsilateral lower pole reflux. In 21 patients surgery was performed through an inguinal incision similar to that for herniorrhaphy, while a Pfannenstiel incision was used initially in the series in 2 others with bilateral duplex systems. Median patient age at operation was 10 months (range 2 to 56). Results: At a mean followup of 26 months preoperative upper pole hydronephrosis and distal upper ureteral dilatation had resolved or improved in all cases. Preliminary cutaneous ureterostomy was performed on 4 ureters (3 patients), 2 because the recipient lower pole ureter was thought to be too small for incision and anastomosis, 1 because of purulent drainage and 1 following inadvertent transection of the lower pole ureter. Mean surgical time for inguinal ureteroureterostomy was 101 minutes and mean postoperative hospitalization was 0.6 days. Except for dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection in 1 patient with symptomatic grade I ipsilateral lower pole reflux, no additional surgical procedures were performed after ureteroureterostomy. Conclusions: Lower ureteroureterostomy offers potentially definitive treatment for ectopic ureter or ureterocele without ipsilateral lower pole reflux, and can be performed through an inguinal herniorrhaphy type incision.",
keywords = "replantation, ureteral obstruction, ureterocele, ureterostomy, urologic surgical procedures",
author = "Juan Prieto and Ali Ziada and Linda Baker and Warren Snodgrass",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2008.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "181",
pages = "1844--1850",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ureteroureterostomy via Inguinal Incision for Ectopic Ureters and Ureteroceles Without Ipsilateral Lower Pole Reflux

AU - Prieto, Juan

AU - Ziada, Ali

AU - Baker, Linda

AU - Snodgrass, Warren

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Purpose: We report outcomes from ureteroureterostomy performed through an inguinal herniorrhaphy type incision for definitive management of ectopic ureters or ureteroceles in the absence of ipsilateral lower pole reflux. Materials and Methods: Records were reviewed for 23 consecutive patients who underwent lower ureteroureterostomy for 26 duplicated systems with ectopic ureter or ureterocele and no ipsilateral lower pole reflux. In 21 patients surgery was performed through an inguinal incision similar to that for herniorrhaphy, while a Pfannenstiel incision was used initially in the series in 2 others with bilateral duplex systems. Median patient age at operation was 10 months (range 2 to 56). Results: At a mean followup of 26 months preoperative upper pole hydronephrosis and distal upper ureteral dilatation had resolved or improved in all cases. Preliminary cutaneous ureterostomy was performed on 4 ureters (3 patients), 2 because the recipient lower pole ureter was thought to be too small for incision and anastomosis, 1 because of purulent drainage and 1 following inadvertent transection of the lower pole ureter. Mean surgical time for inguinal ureteroureterostomy was 101 minutes and mean postoperative hospitalization was 0.6 days. Except for dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection in 1 patient with symptomatic grade I ipsilateral lower pole reflux, no additional surgical procedures were performed after ureteroureterostomy. Conclusions: Lower ureteroureterostomy offers potentially definitive treatment for ectopic ureter or ureterocele without ipsilateral lower pole reflux, and can be performed through an inguinal herniorrhaphy type incision.

AB - Purpose: We report outcomes from ureteroureterostomy performed through an inguinal herniorrhaphy type incision for definitive management of ectopic ureters or ureteroceles in the absence of ipsilateral lower pole reflux. Materials and Methods: Records were reviewed for 23 consecutive patients who underwent lower ureteroureterostomy for 26 duplicated systems with ectopic ureter or ureterocele and no ipsilateral lower pole reflux. In 21 patients surgery was performed through an inguinal incision similar to that for herniorrhaphy, while a Pfannenstiel incision was used initially in the series in 2 others with bilateral duplex systems. Median patient age at operation was 10 months (range 2 to 56). Results: At a mean followup of 26 months preoperative upper pole hydronephrosis and distal upper ureteral dilatation had resolved or improved in all cases. Preliminary cutaneous ureterostomy was performed on 4 ureters (3 patients), 2 because the recipient lower pole ureter was thought to be too small for incision and anastomosis, 1 because of purulent drainage and 1 following inadvertent transection of the lower pole ureter. Mean surgical time for inguinal ureteroureterostomy was 101 minutes and mean postoperative hospitalization was 0.6 days. Except for dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection in 1 patient with symptomatic grade I ipsilateral lower pole reflux, no additional surgical procedures were performed after ureteroureterostomy. Conclusions: Lower ureteroureterostomy offers potentially definitive treatment for ectopic ureter or ureterocele without ipsilateral lower pole reflux, and can be performed through an inguinal herniorrhaphy type incision.

KW - replantation

KW - ureteral obstruction

KW - ureterocele

KW - ureterostomy

KW - urologic surgical procedures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62049085436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62049085436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2008.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2008.12.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 19233406

AN - SCOPUS:62049085436

VL - 181

SP - 1844

EP - 1850

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4

ER -