Urgent listing exceptions and outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation: Comparison to standard criteria patients

Ryan R Davies, Michael A. McCulloch, Shylah Haldeman, Samuel S. Gidding, Christian Pizarro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy enables listing exceptions to avoid penalizing patients with waitlist mortality not captured by standard criteria. Outcomes among patients listed by exception have not been analyzed. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of pediatric (≤17 years of age, n = 4,706) listings (2006 to 2015) for primary, isolated heart transplantation within the UNOS data set, assessing Status 1A exception (n = 211, 4.5%) use across regions and patient characteristics and evaluating waitlist outcomes compared with candidates listed using standard criteria. Results Death or removal for reason other than transplant did not differ between exception and standard criteria patients at 1 month (11.7% vs 16.2%, p = not statistically significant [NS]), 2 months (18.2% vs 29.0%, p = 0.11) or overall (16.1% vs 22.0%, p = NS) on the waitlist. Rates were higher than among Status 1B patients (1 month: 2.8%; 2 months: 5.6%; overall: 14.9%; p < 0.0001). The cumulative incidence of competing risks (transplantation, death/removal for reasons other than transplant and removal) did not differ when comparing Status 1A exception patients with Status 1A standard criteria patients. Use of 1A exceptions varied across UNOS regions (1.9% to 22.3%, p < 0.0001). Risk-adjusted modeling identified patients more (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: odds ratio [OR] = 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 5.0; restrictive cardiomyopathy: OR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 4.3) and less (low socioeconomic status: OR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.0) likely to use an exception. Use of exceptions was uncorrelated with regional outcomes. Conclusions Waitlist mortality among Status 1A exception patients is similar to that among those listed by standard criteria. However, variation in exception use across geography and demography may contribute to inequities in access to transplantation, particularly for those with low socioeconomic status. Standardization of practices may decrease regional variation and minimize inequities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)280-288
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Heart Transplantation
Pediatrics
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Social Class
Transplantation
Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Transplants
Geography
Mortality
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Demography
Incidence

Keywords

  • allocation
  • cardiac transplantation
  • listing status
  • outcomes
  • pediatrics
  • survival analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Urgent listing exceptions and outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation : Comparison to standard criteria patients. / Davies, Ryan R; McCulloch, Michael A.; Haldeman, Shylah; Gidding, Samuel S.; Pizarro, Christian.

In: Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, Vol. 36, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 280-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davies, Ryan R ; McCulloch, Michael A. ; Haldeman, Shylah ; Gidding, Samuel S. ; Pizarro, Christian. / Urgent listing exceptions and outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation : Comparison to standard criteria patients. In: Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 2017 ; Vol. 36, No. 3. pp. 280-288.
@article{8b28d350f43a4cc69759e5dc0c584d02,
title = "Urgent listing exceptions and outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation: Comparison to standard criteria patients",
abstract = "Background United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy enables listing exceptions to avoid penalizing patients with waitlist mortality not captured by standard criteria. Outcomes among patients listed by exception have not been analyzed. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of pediatric (≤17 years of age, n = 4,706) listings (2006 to 2015) for primary, isolated heart transplantation within the UNOS data set, assessing Status 1A exception (n = 211, 4.5{\%}) use across regions and patient characteristics and evaluating waitlist outcomes compared with candidates listed using standard criteria. Results Death or removal for reason other than transplant did not differ between exception and standard criteria patients at 1 month (11.7{\%} vs 16.2{\%}, p = not statistically significant [NS]), 2 months (18.2{\%} vs 29.0{\%}, p = 0.11) or overall (16.1{\%} vs 22.0{\%}, p = NS) on the waitlist. Rates were higher than among Status 1B patients (1 month: 2.8{\%}; 2 months: 5.6{\%}; overall: 14.9{\%}; p < 0.0001). The cumulative incidence of competing risks (transplantation, death/removal for reasons other than transplant and removal) did not differ when comparing Status 1A exception patients with Status 1A standard criteria patients. Use of 1A exceptions varied across UNOS regions (1.9{\%} to 22.3{\%}, p < 0.0001). Risk-adjusted modeling identified patients more (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: odds ratio [OR] = 2.8, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 5.0; restrictive cardiomyopathy: OR = 2.7, 95{\%} CI 1.7 to 4.3) and less (low socioeconomic status: OR = 0.7, 95{\%} CI 0.5 to 1.0) likely to use an exception. Use of exceptions was uncorrelated with regional outcomes. Conclusions Waitlist mortality among Status 1A exception patients is similar to that among those listed by standard criteria. However, variation in exception use across geography and demography may contribute to inequities in access to transplantation, particularly for those with low socioeconomic status. Standardization of practices may decrease regional variation and minimize inequities.",
keywords = "allocation, cardiac transplantation, listing status, outcomes, pediatrics, survival analysis",
author = "Davies, {Ryan R} and McCulloch, {Michael A.} and Shylah Haldeman and Gidding, {Samuel S.} and Christian Pizarro",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.healun.2016.09.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "280--288",
journal = "Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation",
issn = "1053-2498",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urgent listing exceptions and outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation

T2 - Comparison to standard criteria patients

AU - Davies, Ryan R

AU - McCulloch, Michael A.

AU - Haldeman, Shylah

AU - Gidding, Samuel S.

AU - Pizarro, Christian

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Background United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy enables listing exceptions to avoid penalizing patients with waitlist mortality not captured by standard criteria. Outcomes among patients listed by exception have not been analyzed. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of pediatric (≤17 years of age, n = 4,706) listings (2006 to 2015) for primary, isolated heart transplantation within the UNOS data set, assessing Status 1A exception (n = 211, 4.5%) use across regions and patient characteristics and evaluating waitlist outcomes compared with candidates listed using standard criteria. Results Death or removal for reason other than transplant did not differ between exception and standard criteria patients at 1 month (11.7% vs 16.2%, p = not statistically significant [NS]), 2 months (18.2% vs 29.0%, p = 0.11) or overall (16.1% vs 22.0%, p = NS) on the waitlist. Rates were higher than among Status 1B patients (1 month: 2.8%; 2 months: 5.6%; overall: 14.9%; p < 0.0001). The cumulative incidence of competing risks (transplantation, death/removal for reasons other than transplant and removal) did not differ when comparing Status 1A exception patients with Status 1A standard criteria patients. Use of 1A exceptions varied across UNOS regions (1.9% to 22.3%, p < 0.0001). Risk-adjusted modeling identified patients more (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: odds ratio [OR] = 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 5.0; restrictive cardiomyopathy: OR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 4.3) and less (low socioeconomic status: OR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.0) likely to use an exception. Use of exceptions was uncorrelated with regional outcomes. Conclusions Waitlist mortality among Status 1A exception patients is similar to that among those listed by standard criteria. However, variation in exception use across geography and demography may contribute to inequities in access to transplantation, particularly for those with low socioeconomic status. Standardization of practices may decrease regional variation and minimize inequities.

AB - Background United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy enables listing exceptions to avoid penalizing patients with waitlist mortality not captured by standard criteria. Outcomes among patients listed by exception have not been analyzed. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of pediatric (≤17 years of age, n = 4,706) listings (2006 to 2015) for primary, isolated heart transplantation within the UNOS data set, assessing Status 1A exception (n = 211, 4.5%) use across regions and patient characteristics and evaluating waitlist outcomes compared with candidates listed using standard criteria. Results Death or removal for reason other than transplant did not differ between exception and standard criteria patients at 1 month (11.7% vs 16.2%, p = not statistically significant [NS]), 2 months (18.2% vs 29.0%, p = 0.11) or overall (16.1% vs 22.0%, p = NS) on the waitlist. Rates were higher than among Status 1B patients (1 month: 2.8%; 2 months: 5.6%; overall: 14.9%; p < 0.0001). The cumulative incidence of competing risks (transplantation, death/removal for reasons other than transplant and removal) did not differ when comparing Status 1A exception patients with Status 1A standard criteria patients. Use of 1A exceptions varied across UNOS regions (1.9% to 22.3%, p < 0.0001). Risk-adjusted modeling identified patients more (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: odds ratio [OR] = 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 5.0; restrictive cardiomyopathy: OR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 4.3) and less (low socioeconomic status: OR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.0) likely to use an exception. Use of exceptions was uncorrelated with regional outcomes. Conclusions Waitlist mortality among Status 1A exception patients is similar to that among those listed by standard criteria. However, variation in exception use across geography and demography may contribute to inequities in access to transplantation, particularly for those with low socioeconomic status. Standardization of practices may decrease regional variation and minimize inequities.

KW - allocation

KW - cardiac transplantation

KW - listing status

KW - outcomes

KW - pediatrics

KW - survival analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006989303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006989303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.healun.2016.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.healun.2016.09.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 27884629

AN - SCOPUS:85006989303

VL - 36

SP - 280

EP - 288

JO - Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

JF - Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

SN - 1053-2498

IS - 3

ER -