Use of an Electronic Medical Record to Assess Patient-Reported Morbidity Following Ureteroscopy

Monica S C Morgan, Jodi Antonelli, Yair Lotan, Nabeel Shakir, Nicholas Kavoussi, Adam Cohen, Margaret S Pearle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: With the extensive documentation afforded by our electronic medical record (EMR), we observed an unusually high number of patient-initiated encounters following ureteroscopy (URS). We sought to quantify and categorize patient encounters following URS to determine if we could identify avoidable common problems. Materials and Methods: Following IRB approval, we reviewed the records of 298 consecutive patients with stones who underwent 314 URS procedures between July 2013 and November 2014. Patient demographics, stone characteristics and operative details, as well as telephone encounters, secure online patient-initiated (MyChart) messages, and emergency department (ED) visits following URS were extracted from our EMR (Epic, Verona, WI). We performed univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analysis to identify factors predictive of postoperative patient encounters and compared URS patients to a group of 56 patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) for number and type of encounters. Results: We identified 443 encounters generated by 201 URS patients, including 334 telephone calls, 71 MyChart messages, and 38 ED visits. Among these encounters, 352 (79%) were medically related (pain comprised 45%) and the remainder involved scheduling issues. By UVA age, bilateral versus unilateral URS, stone location (both kidney and ureter), ureteral access sheath size, and total number of stones predicted a postoperative encounter. By MVA, only younger age and larger UAS size were independent predictors. When compared with TURBT patients, URS patients had a 2.5-fold higher risk of having a pain-related postoperative encounter (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.08-7.04, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Among patients undergoing URS for stones, two-thirds made unprompted contact with a healthcare provider and 80% of contacts involved postoperative pain, a finding that is distinct from another endoscopic procedure that does not involve upper tract manipulation. Patients do not perceive URS as the benign procedure doctors do.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S46-S51
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume30
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

Ureteroscopy
Electronic Health Records
Morbidity
Postoperative Pain
Telephone
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Hospital Emergency Service
Research Ethics Committees
Ureter
Documentation
Health Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Use of an Electronic Medical Record to Assess Patient-Reported Morbidity Following Ureteroscopy. / Morgan, Monica S C; Antonelli, Jodi; Lotan, Yair; Shakir, Nabeel; Kavoussi, Nicholas; Cohen, Adam; Pearle, Margaret S.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 30, 01.05.2016, p. S46-S51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aab3b5abf8da4b19bf7fa4e1be1003a0,
title = "Use of an Electronic Medical Record to Assess Patient-Reported Morbidity Following Ureteroscopy",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: With the extensive documentation afforded by our electronic medical record (EMR), we observed an unusually high number of patient-initiated encounters following ureteroscopy (URS). We sought to quantify and categorize patient encounters following URS to determine if we could identify avoidable common problems. Materials and Methods: Following IRB approval, we reviewed the records of 298 consecutive patients with stones who underwent 314 URS procedures between July 2013 and November 2014. Patient demographics, stone characteristics and operative details, as well as telephone encounters, secure online patient-initiated (MyChart) messages, and emergency department (ED) visits following URS were extracted from our EMR (Epic, Verona, WI). We performed univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analysis to identify factors predictive of postoperative patient encounters and compared URS patients to a group of 56 patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) for number and type of encounters. Results: We identified 443 encounters generated by 201 URS patients, including 334 telephone calls, 71 MyChart messages, and 38 ED visits. Among these encounters, 352 (79{\%}) were medically related (pain comprised 45{\%}) and the remainder involved scheduling issues. By UVA age, bilateral versus unilateral URS, stone location (both kidney and ureter), ureteral access sheath size, and total number of stones predicted a postoperative encounter. By MVA, only younger age and larger UAS size were independent predictors. When compared with TURBT patients, URS patients had a 2.5-fold higher risk of having a pain-related postoperative encounter (OR 2.54, 95{\%} CI 1.08-7.04, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Among patients undergoing URS for stones, two-thirds made unprompted contact with a healthcare provider and 80{\%} of contacts involved postoperative pain, a finding that is distinct from another endoscopic procedure that does not involve upper tract manipulation. Patients do not perceive URS as the benign procedure doctors do.",
author = "Morgan, {Monica S C} and Jodi Antonelli and Yair Lotan and Nabeel Shakir and Nicholas Kavoussi and Adam Cohen and Pearle, {Margaret S}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/end.2016.0079",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "S46--S51",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of an Electronic Medical Record to Assess Patient-Reported Morbidity Following Ureteroscopy

AU - Morgan, Monica S C

AU - Antonelli, Jodi

AU - Lotan, Yair

AU - Shakir, Nabeel

AU - Kavoussi, Nicholas

AU - Cohen, Adam

AU - Pearle, Margaret S

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Background and Purpose: With the extensive documentation afforded by our electronic medical record (EMR), we observed an unusually high number of patient-initiated encounters following ureteroscopy (URS). We sought to quantify and categorize patient encounters following URS to determine if we could identify avoidable common problems. Materials and Methods: Following IRB approval, we reviewed the records of 298 consecutive patients with stones who underwent 314 URS procedures between July 2013 and November 2014. Patient demographics, stone characteristics and operative details, as well as telephone encounters, secure online patient-initiated (MyChart) messages, and emergency department (ED) visits following URS were extracted from our EMR (Epic, Verona, WI). We performed univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analysis to identify factors predictive of postoperative patient encounters and compared URS patients to a group of 56 patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) for number and type of encounters. Results: We identified 443 encounters generated by 201 URS patients, including 334 telephone calls, 71 MyChart messages, and 38 ED visits. Among these encounters, 352 (79%) were medically related (pain comprised 45%) and the remainder involved scheduling issues. By UVA age, bilateral versus unilateral URS, stone location (both kidney and ureter), ureteral access sheath size, and total number of stones predicted a postoperative encounter. By MVA, only younger age and larger UAS size were independent predictors. When compared with TURBT patients, URS patients had a 2.5-fold higher risk of having a pain-related postoperative encounter (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.08-7.04, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Among patients undergoing URS for stones, two-thirds made unprompted contact with a healthcare provider and 80% of contacts involved postoperative pain, a finding that is distinct from another endoscopic procedure that does not involve upper tract manipulation. Patients do not perceive URS as the benign procedure doctors do.

AB - Background and Purpose: With the extensive documentation afforded by our electronic medical record (EMR), we observed an unusually high number of patient-initiated encounters following ureteroscopy (URS). We sought to quantify and categorize patient encounters following URS to determine if we could identify avoidable common problems. Materials and Methods: Following IRB approval, we reviewed the records of 298 consecutive patients with stones who underwent 314 URS procedures between July 2013 and November 2014. Patient demographics, stone characteristics and operative details, as well as telephone encounters, secure online patient-initiated (MyChart) messages, and emergency department (ED) visits following URS were extracted from our EMR (Epic, Verona, WI). We performed univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analysis to identify factors predictive of postoperative patient encounters and compared URS patients to a group of 56 patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) for number and type of encounters. Results: We identified 443 encounters generated by 201 URS patients, including 334 telephone calls, 71 MyChart messages, and 38 ED visits. Among these encounters, 352 (79%) were medically related (pain comprised 45%) and the remainder involved scheduling issues. By UVA age, bilateral versus unilateral URS, stone location (both kidney and ureter), ureteral access sheath size, and total number of stones predicted a postoperative encounter. By MVA, only younger age and larger UAS size were independent predictors. When compared with TURBT patients, URS patients had a 2.5-fold higher risk of having a pain-related postoperative encounter (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.08-7.04, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Among patients undergoing URS for stones, two-thirds made unprompted contact with a healthcare provider and 80% of contacts involved postoperative pain, a finding that is distinct from another endoscopic procedure that does not involve upper tract manipulation. Patients do not perceive URS as the benign procedure doctors do.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969627565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969627565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2016.0079

DO - 10.1089/end.2016.0079

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - S46-S51

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

ER -