Use of an implantable hearing device

Wende Yellin, Peter S. Roland, Marvin Culbertson, William L. Meyerhoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper was to discuss our experiences with an implantable bone conduction hearing prosthesis, the XOMED Audiant Bone Conductor (Jacksonville, FL). Patients and Methods: Twenty-four patients who had been implanted with the Audiant Bone Conductor were interviewed by telephone following implantation. Questions were asked regarding use of the device and subjective benefit. Results: Eleven patients are using their devices, 12 patients are not using their devices, and one patient has been lost to follow-up. Patients using the device report satisfaction and prefer the Audiant to other amplification systems, whereas those not using the device indicate that insufficient amplification or weak magnetic attraction prevent its use. Conclusions: Analysis of failures has altered our criteria for implantation. With improvements that have been made by XOMED and stricter patient criteria, the Audiant should be considered a viable amplification alternative for certain hearing-impaired patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-37
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1997

Fingerprint

Hearing
Equipment and Supplies
Bone Conduction
Bone and Bones
Lost to Follow-Up
Telephone
Prostheses and Implants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Use of an implantable hearing device. / Yellin, Wende; Roland, Peter S.; Culbertson, Marvin; Meyerhoff, William L.

In: American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.1997, p. 33-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yellin, Wende ; Roland, Peter S. ; Culbertson, Marvin ; Meyerhoff, William L. / Use of an implantable hearing device. In: American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery. 1997 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 33-37.
@article{4a0652fbed474462ab67b0a5a36143ae,
title = "Use of an implantable hearing device",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper was to discuss our experiences with an implantable bone conduction hearing prosthesis, the XOMED Audiant Bone Conductor (Jacksonville, FL). Patients and Methods: Twenty-four patients who had been implanted with the Audiant Bone Conductor were interviewed by telephone following implantation. Questions were asked regarding use of the device and subjective benefit. Results: Eleven patients are using their devices, 12 patients are not using their devices, and one patient has been lost to follow-up. Patients using the device report satisfaction and prefer the Audiant to other amplification systems, whereas those not using the device indicate that insufficient amplification or weak magnetic attraction prevent its use. Conclusions: Analysis of failures has altered our criteria for implantation. With improvements that have been made by XOMED and stricter patient criteria, the Audiant should be considered a viable amplification alternative for certain hearing-impaired patients.",
author = "Wende Yellin and Roland, {Peter S.} and Marvin Culbertson and Meyerhoff, {William L.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0196-0709(97)90046-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "33--37",
journal = "American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery",
issn = "0196-0709",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of an implantable hearing device

AU - Yellin, Wende

AU - Roland, Peter S.

AU - Culbertson, Marvin

AU - Meyerhoff, William L.

PY - 1997/1

Y1 - 1997/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper was to discuss our experiences with an implantable bone conduction hearing prosthesis, the XOMED Audiant Bone Conductor (Jacksonville, FL). Patients and Methods: Twenty-four patients who had been implanted with the Audiant Bone Conductor were interviewed by telephone following implantation. Questions were asked regarding use of the device and subjective benefit. Results: Eleven patients are using their devices, 12 patients are not using their devices, and one patient has been lost to follow-up. Patients using the device report satisfaction and prefer the Audiant to other amplification systems, whereas those not using the device indicate that insufficient amplification or weak magnetic attraction prevent its use. Conclusions: Analysis of failures has altered our criteria for implantation. With improvements that have been made by XOMED and stricter patient criteria, the Audiant should be considered a viable amplification alternative for certain hearing-impaired patients.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper was to discuss our experiences with an implantable bone conduction hearing prosthesis, the XOMED Audiant Bone Conductor (Jacksonville, FL). Patients and Methods: Twenty-four patients who had been implanted with the Audiant Bone Conductor were interviewed by telephone following implantation. Questions were asked regarding use of the device and subjective benefit. Results: Eleven patients are using their devices, 12 patients are not using their devices, and one patient has been lost to follow-up. Patients using the device report satisfaction and prefer the Audiant to other amplification systems, whereas those not using the device indicate that insufficient amplification or weak magnetic attraction prevent its use. Conclusions: Analysis of failures has altered our criteria for implantation. With improvements that have been made by XOMED and stricter patient criteria, the Audiant should be considered a viable amplification alternative for certain hearing-impaired patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031027325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031027325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0196-0709(97)90046-6

DO - 10.1016/S0196-0709(97)90046-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 9006675

AN - SCOPUS:0031027325

VL - 18

SP - 33

EP - 37

JO - American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery

JF - American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery

SN - 0196-0709

IS - 1

ER -