TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of cuffed oropharyngeal vs laryngeal mask airway in elderly patients
AU - Ezri, Tiberiu
AU - Ady, Nimrod
AU - Szmuk, Peter
AU - Glanz, Lucio
AU - Shklar, Bentzion
AU - Katz, Jeffrey
AU - Geva, Daniel
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - Purpose: This study was designed to compare the new cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) to the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in elderly patients. Methods: In a randomized, controlled study, 80 patients, age ≥ 65, ASA I- III, undergoing urology procedures, were managed with either COPA or LMA. Propofol requirements for insertion of the devices, ease of insertion and removal, airway manipulations, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, P(ET)CO2, SpO2, peak inspiratory pressure, selection of the appropriate size of the device and leaks, fibreoptic visualization of larynx and complications were studied. Results: There were more airway manipulations in the COPA group than in the LMA group (40% and 5% respectively) whereas P(ET)CO2 was higher in the LMA group (P <0.05). In 60% of COPA patients the vocal cords could not be visualized but ventilation was adequate in all but two cases. Postoperative sore throat occurred in 20% of patients with LMA vs 10% with COPA). Bloody secretions on the device were present in two patients managed with LMA. Conclusion: In elderly patients COPA required more airway manipulations than the LMA. Laryngeal mask airway caused more sore throats, but was better for fibreoptic visualisation of the larynx. Both are excellent options when intubation is not indicated/desired.
AB - Purpose: This study was designed to compare the new cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) to the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in elderly patients. Methods: In a randomized, controlled study, 80 patients, age ≥ 65, ASA I- III, undergoing urology procedures, were managed with either COPA or LMA. Propofol requirements for insertion of the devices, ease of insertion and removal, airway manipulations, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, P(ET)CO2, SpO2, peak inspiratory pressure, selection of the appropriate size of the device and leaks, fibreoptic visualization of larynx and complications were studied. Results: There were more airway manipulations in the COPA group than in the LMA group (40% and 5% respectively) whereas P(ET)CO2 was higher in the LMA group (P <0.05). In 60% of COPA patients the vocal cords could not be visualized but ventilation was adequate in all but two cases. Postoperative sore throat occurred in 20% of patients with LMA vs 10% with COPA). Bloody secretions on the device were present in two patients managed with LMA. Conclusion: In elderly patients COPA required more airway manipulations than the LMA. Laryngeal mask airway caused more sore throats, but was better for fibreoptic visualisation of the larynx. Both are excellent options when intubation is not indicated/desired.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032994388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032994388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF03013229
DO - 10.1007/BF03013229
M3 - Article
C2 - 10232721
AN - SCOPUS:0032994388
SN - 0832-610X
VL - 46
SP - 363
EP - 367
JO - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
IS - 4
ER -