Use of echocardiography to detect occult cardiac injury after penetrating thoracic trauma: A prospective study

Dan M Meyer, Michael E Jessen, P. A. Grayburn, J. C. Young, R. Simon, F. Lewis, S. M. Steinberg, G. M. Watkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One hundred five hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating thoracic trauma were prospectively evaluated for occult cardiac injury. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (ECHO) and subxiphoid exploration (SXE). Those with positive SXE underwent exploration. Results are calculated based on operative findings of significant injuries. For the entire group. SXE was more sensitive than ECHO (sensitivity, 100% vs. 56%; specificity. 92% vs. 93%; and accuracy, 92% vs. 90%, respectively). The SXE missed no injuries in this group. Eight of 17 patients, however, with positive SXEs had insignificant injuries at sternotomy. Seven patients had positive ECHO, but no significant injury. The ECHO missed four significant injuries. When comparing SXE with ECHO in patients without hemothorax, however, sensitivity (100% vs. 100%), specificity (89% vs. 91%), and accuracy (90% vs. 91%) were comparable between SXE and ECHO. We conclude that ECHO has significant limitations in identifying serious cardiac injuries in patients with hemothorax. For hemodynamically stable patients without hemothorax, ECHO missed no significant injuries and may be an acceptable diagnostic option for detecting significant cardiac trauma in patients with injuries in proximity to the heart.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)902-909
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Echocardiography
Thorax
Prospective Studies
Wounds and Injuries
Hemothorax
Sternotomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Use of echocardiography to detect occult cardiac injury after penetrating thoracic trauma : A prospective study. / Meyer, Dan M; Jessen, Michael E; Grayburn, P. A.; Young, J. C.; Simon, R.; Lewis, F.; Steinberg, S. M.; Watkins, G. M.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 39, No. 5, 1995, p. 902-909.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meyer, Dan M ; Jessen, Michael E ; Grayburn, P. A. ; Young, J. C. ; Simon, R. ; Lewis, F. ; Steinberg, S. M. ; Watkins, G. M. / Use of echocardiography to detect occult cardiac injury after penetrating thoracic trauma : A prospective study. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1995 ; Vol. 39, No. 5. pp. 902-909.
@article{c0651f177ae748baac3af5f0549d6c62,
title = "Use of echocardiography to detect occult cardiac injury after penetrating thoracic trauma: A prospective study",
abstract = "One hundred five hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating thoracic trauma were prospectively evaluated for occult cardiac injury. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (ECHO) and subxiphoid exploration (SXE). Those with positive SXE underwent exploration. Results are calculated based on operative findings of significant injuries. For the entire group. SXE was more sensitive than ECHO (sensitivity, 100{\%} vs. 56{\%}; specificity. 92{\%} vs. 93{\%}; and accuracy, 92{\%} vs. 90{\%}, respectively). The SXE missed no injuries in this group. Eight of 17 patients, however, with positive SXEs had insignificant injuries at sternotomy. Seven patients had positive ECHO, but no significant injury. The ECHO missed four significant injuries. When comparing SXE with ECHO in patients without hemothorax, however, sensitivity (100{\%} vs. 100{\%}), specificity (89{\%} vs. 91{\%}), and accuracy (90{\%} vs. 91{\%}) were comparable between SXE and ECHO. We conclude that ECHO has significant limitations in identifying serious cardiac injuries in patients with hemothorax. For hemodynamically stable patients without hemothorax, ECHO missed no significant injuries and may be an acceptable diagnostic option for detecting significant cardiac trauma in patients with injuries in proximity to the heart.",
author = "Meyer, {Dan M} and Jessen, {Michael E} and Grayburn, {P. A.} and Young, {J. C.} and R. Simon and F. Lewis and Steinberg, {S. M.} and Watkins, {G. M.}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1097/00005373-199511000-00014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "902--909",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of echocardiography to detect occult cardiac injury after penetrating thoracic trauma

T2 - A prospective study

AU - Meyer, Dan M

AU - Jessen, Michael E

AU - Grayburn, P. A.

AU - Young, J. C.

AU - Simon, R.

AU - Lewis, F.

AU - Steinberg, S. M.

AU - Watkins, G. M.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - One hundred five hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating thoracic trauma were prospectively evaluated for occult cardiac injury. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (ECHO) and subxiphoid exploration (SXE). Those with positive SXE underwent exploration. Results are calculated based on operative findings of significant injuries. For the entire group. SXE was more sensitive than ECHO (sensitivity, 100% vs. 56%; specificity. 92% vs. 93%; and accuracy, 92% vs. 90%, respectively). The SXE missed no injuries in this group. Eight of 17 patients, however, with positive SXEs had insignificant injuries at sternotomy. Seven patients had positive ECHO, but no significant injury. The ECHO missed four significant injuries. When comparing SXE with ECHO in patients without hemothorax, however, sensitivity (100% vs. 100%), specificity (89% vs. 91%), and accuracy (90% vs. 91%) were comparable between SXE and ECHO. We conclude that ECHO has significant limitations in identifying serious cardiac injuries in patients with hemothorax. For hemodynamically stable patients without hemothorax, ECHO missed no significant injuries and may be an acceptable diagnostic option for detecting significant cardiac trauma in patients with injuries in proximity to the heart.

AB - One hundred five hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating thoracic trauma were prospectively evaluated for occult cardiac injury. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (ECHO) and subxiphoid exploration (SXE). Those with positive SXE underwent exploration. Results are calculated based on operative findings of significant injuries. For the entire group. SXE was more sensitive than ECHO (sensitivity, 100% vs. 56%; specificity. 92% vs. 93%; and accuracy, 92% vs. 90%, respectively). The SXE missed no injuries in this group. Eight of 17 patients, however, with positive SXEs had insignificant injuries at sternotomy. Seven patients had positive ECHO, but no significant injury. The ECHO missed four significant injuries. When comparing SXE with ECHO in patients without hemothorax, however, sensitivity (100% vs. 100%), specificity (89% vs. 91%), and accuracy (90% vs. 91%) were comparable between SXE and ECHO. We conclude that ECHO has significant limitations in identifying serious cardiac injuries in patients with hemothorax. For hemodynamically stable patients without hemothorax, ECHO missed no significant injuries and may be an acceptable diagnostic option for detecting significant cardiac trauma in patients with injuries in proximity to the heart.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028832433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028832433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005373-199511000-00014

DO - 10.1097/00005373-199511000-00014

M3 - Article

C2 - 7474006

AN - SCOPUS:0028832433

VL - 39

SP - 902

EP - 909

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 5

ER -