Use of Intravascular Imaging During Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Insights From a Contemporary Multicenter Registry

Judit Karacsonyi, Khaldoon Alaswad, Farouc A. Jaffer, Robert W. Yeh, Mitul Patel, John Bahadorani, Aris Karatasakis, Barbara A. Danek, Anthony Doing, J. Aaron Grantham, Dimitri Karmpaliotis, Jeffrey W. Moses, Ajay Kirtane, Manish Parikh, Ziad Ali, William L. Lombardi, David E. Kandzari, Nicholas Lembo, Santiago Garcia, Michael R. Wyman & 9 others Aya Alame, Phuong Khanh J. Nguyen-Trong, Erica Resendes, Pratik Kalsaria, Bavana V. Rangan, Imre Ungi, Craig A. Thompson, Subhash Banerjee, Emmanouil S. Brilakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Intravascular imaging can facilitate chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results: We examined the frequency of use and outcomes of intravascular imaging among 619 CTO percutaneous coronary interventions performed between 2012 and 2015 at 7 US centers. Mean age was 65.4±10 years and 85% of the patients were men. Intravascular imaging was used in 38%: intravascular ultrasound in 36%, optical coherence tomography in 3%, and both in 1.45%. Intravascular imaging was used for stent sizing (26.3%), stent optimization (38.0%), and CTO crossing (35.7%, antegrade in 27.9%, and retrograde in 7.8%). Intravascular imaging to facilitate crossing was used more frequently in lesions with proximal cap ambiguity (49% versus 26%, P<0.0001) and with retrograde as compared with antegrade-only cases (67% versus 31%, P<0.0001). Despite higher complexity (Japanese CTO score: 2.86±1.19 versus 2.43±1.19, P=0.001), cases in which imaging was used for crossing had similar technical and procedural success (92.8% versus 89.6%, P=0.302 and 90.1% versus 88.3%, P=0.588, respectively) and similar incidence of major cardiac adverse events (2.7% versus 3.2%, P=0.772). Use of intravascular imaging was associated with longer procedure (192 minutes [interquartile range 130, 255] versus 131 minutes [90, 192], P<0.0001) and fluoroscopy (71 minutes [44, 93] versus 39 minutes [25, 69], P<0.0001) time. Conclusions: Intravascular imaging is frequently performed during CTO percutaneous coronary intervention both for crossing and for stent selection/optimization. Despite its use in more complex lesion subsets, intravascular imaging was associated with similar rates of technical and procedural success for CTO percutaneous coronary intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere003890
JournalJournal of the American Heart Association
Volume5
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Registries
Stents
Fluoroscopy
Optical Coherence Tomography
Incidence

Keywords

  • Chronic total occlusion
  • Intravascular ultrasound
  • Optical coherence tomography
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Use of Intravascular Imaging During Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention : Insights From a Contemporary Multicenter Registry. / Karacsonyi, Judit; Alaswad, Khaldoon; Jaffer, Farouc A.; Yeh, Robert W.; Patel, Mitul; Bahadorani, John; Karatasakis, Aris; Danek, Barbara A.; Doing, Anthony; Grantham, J. Aaron; Karmpaliotis, Dimitri; Moses, Jeffrey W.; Kirtane, Ajay; Parikh, Manish; Ali, Ziad; Lombardi, William L.; Kandzari, David E.; Lembo, Nicholas; Garcia, Santiago; Wyman, Michael R.; Alame, Aya; Nguyen-Trong, Phuong Khanh J.; Resendes, Erica; Kalsaria, Pratik; Rangan, Bavana V.; Ungi, Imre; Thompson, Craig A.; Banerjee, Subhash; Brilakis, Emmanouil S.

In: Journal of the American Heart Association, Vol. 5, No. 8, e003890, 01.08.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Karacsonyi, J, Alaswad, K, Jaffer, FA, Yeh, RW, Patel, M, Bahadorani, J, Karatasakis, A, Danek, BA, Doing, A, Grantham, JA, Karmpaliotis, D, Moses, JW, Kirtane, A, Parikh, M, Ali, Z, Lombardi, WL, Kandzari, DE, Lembo, N, Garcia, S, Wyman, MR, Alame, A, Nguyen-Trong, PKJ, Resendes, E, Kalsaria, P, Rangan, BV, Ungi, I, Thompson, CA, Banerjee, S & Brilakis, ES 2016, 'Use of Intravascular Imaging During Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From a Contemporary Multicenter Registry', Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 5, no. 8, e003890. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003890
Karacsonyi, Judit ; Alaswad, Khaldoon ; Jaffer, Farouc A. ; Yeh, Robert W. ; Patel, Mitul ; Bahadorani, John ; Karatasakis, Aris ; Danek, Barbara A. ; Doing, Anthony ; Grantham, J. Aaron ; Karmpaliotis, Dimitri ; Moses, Jeffrey W. ; Kirtane, Ajay ; Parikh, Manish ; Ali, Ziad ; Lombardi, William L. ; Kandzari, David E. ; Lembo, Nicholas ; Garcia, Santiago ; Wyman, Michael R. ; Alame, Aya ; Nguyen-Trong, Phuong Khanh J. ; Resendes, Erica ; Kalsaria, Pratik ; Rangan, Bavana V. ; Ungi, Imre ; Thompson, Craig A. ; Banerjee, Subhash ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S. / Use of Intravascular Imaging During Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention : Insights From a Contemporary Multicenter Registry. In: Journal of the American Heart Association. 2016 ; Vol. 5, No. 8.
@article{d27b6bafb24f4eb497be05aecbcbdebe,
title = "Use of Intravascular Imaging During Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From a Contemporary Multicenter Registry",
abstract = "Background: Intravascular imaging can facilitate chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results: We examined the frequency of use and outcomes of intravascular imaging among 619 CTO percutaneous coronary interventions performed between 2012 and 2015 at 7 US centers. Mean age was 65.4±10 years and 85{\%} of the patients were men. Intravascular imaging was used in 38{\%}: intravascular ultrasound in 36{\%}, optical coherence tomography in 3{\%}, and both in 1.45{\%}. Intravascular imaging was used for stent sizing (26.3{\%}), stent optimization (38.0{\%}), and CTO crossing (35.7{\%}, antegrade in 27.9{\%}, and retrograde in 7.8{\%}). Intravascular imaging to facilitate crossing was used more frequently in lesions with proximal cap ambiguity (49{\%} versus 26{\%}, P<0.0001) and with retrograde as compared with antegrade-only cases (67{\%} versus 31{\%}, P<0.0001). Despite higher complexity (Japanese CTO score: 2.86±1.19 versus 2.43±1.19, P=0.001), cases in which imaging was used for crossing had similar technical and procedural success (92.8{\%} versus 89.6{\%}, P=0.302 and 90.1{\%} versus 88.3{\%}, P=0.588, respectively) and similar incidence of major cardiac adverse events (2.7{\%} versus 3.2{\%}, P=0.772). Use of intravascular imaging was associated with longer procedure (192 minutes [interquartile range 130, 255] versus 131 minutes [90, 192], P<0.0001) and fluoroscopy (71 minutes [44, 93] versus 39 minutes [25, 69], P<0.0001) time. Conclusions: Intravascular imaging is frequently performed during CTO percutaneous coronary intervention both for crossing and for stent selection/optimization. Despite its use in more complex lesion subsets, intravascular imaging was associated with similar rates of technical and procedural success for CTO percutaneous coronary intervention.",
keywords = "Chronic total occlusion, Intravascular ultrasound, Optical coherence tomography, Percutaneous coronary intervention",
author = "Judit Karacsonyi and Khaldoon Alaswad and Jaffer, {Farouc A.} and Yeh, {Robert W.} and Mitul Patel and John Bahadorani and Aris Karatasakis and Danek, {Barbara A.} and Anthony Doing and Grantham, {J. Aaron} and Dimitri Karmpaliotis and Moses, {Jeffrey W.} and Ajay Kirtane and Manish Parikh and Ziad Ali and Lombardi, {William L.} and Kandzari, {David E.} and Nicholas Lembo and Santiago Garcia and Wyman, {Michael R.} and Aya Alame and Nguyen-Trong, {Phuong Khanh J.} and Erica Resendes and Pratik Kalsaria and Rangan, {Bavana V.} and Imre Ungi and Thompson, {Craig A.} and Subhash Banerjee and Brilakis, {Emmanouil S.}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1161/JAHA.116.003890",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Journal of the American Heart Association",
issn = "2047-9980",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of Intravascular Imaging During Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

T2 - Insights From a Contemporary Multicenter Registry

AU - Karacsonyi, Judit

AU - Alaswad, Khaldoon

AU - Jaffer, Farouc A.

AU - Yeh, Robert W.

AU - Patel, Mitul

AU - Bahadorani, John

AU - Karatasakis, Aris

AU - Danek, Barbara A.

AU - Doing, Anthony

AU - Grantham, J. Aaron

AU - Karmpaliotis, Dimitri

AU - Moses, Jeffrey W.

AU - Kirtane, Ajay

AU - Parikh, Manish

AU - Ali, Ziad

AU - Lombardi, William L.

AU - Kandzari, David E.

AU - Lembo, Nicholas

AU - Garcia, Santiago

AU - Wyman, Michael R.

AU - Alame, Aya

AU - Nguyen-Trong, Phuong Khanh J.

AU - Resendes, Erica

AU - Kalsaria, Pratik

AU - Rangan, Bavana V.

AU - Ungi, Imre

AU - Thompson, Craig A.

AU - Banerjee, Subhash

AU - Brilakis, Emmanouil S.

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Background: Intravascular imaging can facilitate chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results: We examined the frequency of use and outcomes of intravascular imaging among 619 CTO percutaneous coronary interventions performed between 2012 and 2015 at 7 US centers. Mean age was 65.4±10 years and 85% of the patients were men. Intravascular imaging was used in 38%: intravascular ultrasound in 36%, optical coherence tomography in 3%, and both in 1.45%. Intravascular imaging was used for stent sizing (26.3%), stent optimization (38.0%), and CTO crossing (35.7%, antegrade in 27.9%, and retrograde in 7.8%). Intravascular imaging to facilitate crossing was used more frequently in lesions with proximal cap ambiguity (49% versus 26%, P<0.0001) and with retrograde as compared with antegrade-only cases (67% versus 31%, P<0.0001). Despite higher complexity (Japanese CTO score: 2.86±1.19 versus 2.43±1.19, P=0.001), cases in which imaging was used for crossing had similar technical and procedural success (92.8% versus 89.6%, P=0.302 and 90.1% versus 88.3%, P=0.588, respectively) and similar incidence of major cardiac adverse events (2.7% versus 3.2%, P=0.772). Use of intravascular imaging was associated with longer procedure (192 minutes [interquartile range 130, 255] versus 131 minutes [90, 192], P<0.0001) and fluoroscopy (71 minutes [44, 93] versus 39 minutes [25, 69], P<0.0001) time. Conclusions: Intravascular imaging is frequently performed during CTO percutaneous coronary intervention both for crossing and for stent selection/optimization. Despite its use in more complex lesion subsets, intravascular imaging was associated with similar rates of technical and procedural success for CTO percutaneous coronary intervention.

AB - Background: Intravascular imaging can facilitate chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results: We examined the frequency of use and outcomes of intravascular imaging among 619 CTO percutaneous coronary interventions performed between 2012 and 2015 at 7 US centers. Mean age was 65.4±10 years and 85% of the patients were men. Intravascular imaging was used in 38%: intravascular ultrasound in 36%, optical coherence tomography in 3%, and both in 1.45%. Intravascular imaging was used for stent sizing (26.3%), stent optimization (38.0%), and CTO crossing (35.7%, antegrade in 27.9%, and retrograde in 7.8%). Intravascular imaging to facilitate crossing was used more frequently in lesions with proximal cap ambiguity (49% versus 26%, P<0.0001) and with retrograde as compared with antegrade-only cases (67% versus 31%, P<0.0001). Despite higher complexity (Japanese CTO score: 2.86±1.19 versus 2.43±1.19, P=0.001), cases in which imaging was used for crossing had similar technical and procedural success (92.8% versus 89.6%, P=0.302 and 90.1% versus 88.3%, P=0.588, respectively) and similar incidence of major cardiac adverse events (2.7% versus 3.2%, P=0.772). Use of intravascular imaging was associated with longer procedure (192 minutes [interquartile range 130, 255] versus 131 minutes [90, 192], P<0.0001) and fluoroscopy (71 minutes [44, 93] versus 39 minutes [25, 69], P<0.0001) time. Conclusions: Intravascular imaging is frequently performed during CTO percutaneous coronary intervention both for crossing and for stent selection/optimization. Despite its use in more complex lesion subsets, intravascular imaging was associated with similar rates of technical and procedural success for CTO percutaneous coronary intervention.

KW - Chronic total occlusion

KW - Intravascular ultrasound

KW - Optical coherence tomography

KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007104410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007104410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.116.003890

DO - 10.1161/JAHA.116.003890

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Journal of the American Heart Association

JF - Journal of the American Heart Association

SN - 2047-9980

IS - 8

M1 - e003890

ER -