TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of virtual care by infectious disease specialists in Canada
T2 - A national survey
AU - Lam, Philip W.
AU - Schwartz, Ilan S.
AU - Medford, Richard J.
N1 - Funding Information:
No financial support was for the conduct of this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.
PY - 2022/6/30
Y1 - 2022/6/30
N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize the type and extent of virtual care use among infectious disease specialists in Canada, with a focus on the clinical factors that influence the decision to provide virtual versus in-person care. Methods: Infectious disease physicians practicing in Canada were invited to complete a survey regarding their experiences with virtual care. The survey included 14 vignettes depicting new outpatient and post-hospital-discharge referrals. Participants were asked to select which (if any) virtual care modalities they would feel comfortable using and to specify a reason if they did not feel comfortable providing care virtually. Machine learning and natural language processing techniques were used to identify themes. Results: In total, 57 infectious disease physicians completed the survey. Respondents reported devoting 36.5% (SD, 18.4%) of their infectious disease practice to outpatient care, with 44.2% (SD, 23.2%) of it being delivered virtually. Respondents were more comfortable providing virtual care to post-hospital-discharge referrals who had been seen by an infectious disease physician compared to new outpatient referrals. When respondents were not comfortable with using any virtual care modality, the following common themes emerged: the need for physical examination, the importance of establishing a therapeutic relationship, the need for additional in-person tests or diagnostics, and patient counselling. Conclusion: This study provides a glimpse into the current state of virtual care use in Canada and some of the major themes that affect decision making for virtual versus in-person care.
AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize the type and extent of virtual care use among infectious disease specialists in Canada, with a focus on the clinical factors that influence the decision to provide virtual versus in-person care. Methods: Infectious disease physicians practicing in Canada were invited to complete a survey regarding their experiences with virtual care. The survey included 14 vignettes depicting new outpatient and post-hospital-discharge referrals. Participants were asked to select which (if any) virtual care modalities they would feel comfortable using and to specify a reason if they did not feel comfortable providing care virtually. Machine learning and natural language processing techniques were used to identify themes. Results: In total, 57 infectious disease physicians completed the survey. Respondents reported devoting 36.5% (SD, 18.4%) of their infectious disease practice to outpatient care, with 44.2% (SD, 23.2%) of it being delivered virtually. Respondents were more comfortable providing virtual care to post-hospital-discharge referrals who had been seen by an infectious disease physician compared to new outpatient referrals. When respondents were not comfortable with using any virtual care modality, the following common themes emerged: the need for physical examination, the importance of establishing a therapeutic relationship, the need for additional in-person tests or diagnostics, and patient counselling. Conclusion: This study provides a glimpse into the current state of virtual care use in Canada and some of the major themes that affect decision making for virtual versus in-person care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133602800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133602800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/ash.2022.246
DO - 10.1017/ash.2022.246
M3 - Article
C2 - 36483399
AN - SCOPUS:85133602800
SN - 2732-494X
VL - 2
JO - Antimicrobial Stewardship and Healthcare Epidemiology
JF - Antimicrobial Stewardship and Healthcare Epidemiology
IS - 1
M1 - e106
ER -