Validated assessment tools and maintenance of certification in plastic surgery: Current status, challenges, and future possibilities

Jeffrey E. Janis, Nicholas B. Vedder, Christopher M. Reid, Amanda Gosman, Karen Mann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The transition to the Next Accreditation System is well underway, and a shift toward competency-based assessment in the form of milestones is now the standard. A significant effort has been completed by the Plastic Surgery Milestones Working Group to develop specific milestones and assessment tools for plastic surgery training. Methods: The history of the development toward competency-based assessment was reviewed. Data regarding the trends and regulations associated with board certification and the role of maintenance of certification were reviewed. Results: The work of the Plastic Surgery Milestones Working Group has sparked interest in assessment and created an opportunity for further development. The efforts toward validating assessment tools by our colleagues working in other surgical specialties serve as a suitable roadmap for further progress. Board certification is an integral part of successful practice and should be regarded as an expectation. Despite the burdens associated with maintenance of certification, it serves a valuable function in ensuring optimal patient care and is often retrospectively seen as an important component of practice. Conclusions: The competency-based milestones are the new standard, and work on this new methodology of assessing plastic surgery trainees is expected to continue. Accurate assessment is critical to the pathways for board certification and maintenance of certification, which serve important roles for all parties involved in the delivery of medical care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1327-1333
Number of pages7
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume137
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Certification
Plastic Surgery
Maintenance
Surgical Specialties
Critical Pathways
Accreditation
Patient Care
History

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Validated assessment tools and maintenance of certification in plastic surgery : Current status, challenges, and future possibilities. / Janis, Jeffrey E.; Vedder, Nicholas B.; Reid, Christopher M.; Gosman, Amanda; Mann, Karen.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 137, No. 4, 2016, p. 1327-1333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Janis, Jeffrey E. ; Vedder, Nicholas B. ; Reid, Christopher M. ; Gosman, Amanda ; Mann, Karen. / Validated assessment tools and maintenance of certification in plastic surgery : Current status, challenges, and future possibilities. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 137, No. 4. pp. 1327-1333.
@article{c1bf42773a20486ca9ed9e0e5f125e66,
title = "Validated assessment tools and maintenance of certification in plastic surgery: Current status, challenges, and future possibilities",
abstract = "Background: The transition to the Next Accreditation System is well underway, and a shift toward competency-based assessment in the form of milestones is now the standard. A significant effort has been completed by the Plastic Surgery Milestones Working Group to develop specific milestones and assessment tools for plastic surgery training. Methods: The history of the development toward competency-based assessment was reviewed. Data regarding the trends and regulations associated with board certification and the role of maintenance of certification were reviewed. Results: The work of the Plastic Surgery Milestones Working Group has sparked interest in assessment and created an opportunity for further development. The efforts toward validating assessment tools by our colleagues working in other surgical specialties serve as a suitable roadmap for further progress. Board certification is an integral part of successful practice and should be regarded as an expectation. Despite the burdens associated with maintenance of certification, it serves a valuable function in ensuring optimal patient care and is often retrospectively seen as an important component of practice. Conclusions: The competency-based milestones are the new standard, and work on this new methodology of assessing plastic surgery trainees is expected to continue. Accurate assessment is critical to the pathways for board certification and maintenance of certification, which serve important roles for all parties involved in the delivery of medical care.",
author = "Janis, {Jeffrey E.} and Vedder, {Nicholas B.} and Reid, {Christopher M.} and Amanda Gosman and Karen Mann",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000002038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
pages = "1327--1333",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validated assessment tools and maintenance of certification in plastic surgery

T2 - Current status, challenges, and future possibilities

AU - Janis, Jeffrey E.

AU - Vedder, Nicholas B.

AU - Reid, Christopher M.

AU - Gosman, Amanda

AU - Mann, Karen

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: The transition to the Next Accreditation System is well underway, and a shift toward competency-based assessment in the form of milestones is now the standard. A significant effort has been completed by the Plastic Surgery Milestones Working Group to develop specific milestones and assessment tools for plastic surgery training. Methods: The history of the development toward competency-based assessment was reviewed. Data regarding the trends and regulations associated with board certification and the role of maintenance of certification were reviewed. Results: The work of the Plastic Surgery Milestones Working Group has sparked interest in assessment and created an opportunity for further development. The efforts toward validating assessment tools by our colleagues working in other surgical specialties serve as a suitable roadmap for further progress. Board certification is an integral part of successful practice and should be regarded as an expectation. Despite the burdens associated with maintenance of certification, it serves a valuable function in ensuring optimal patient care and is often retrospectively seen as an important component of practice. Conclusions: The competency-based milestones are the new standard, and work on this new methodology of assessing plastic surgery trainees is expected to continue. Accurate assessment is critical to the pathways for board certification and maintenance of certification, which serve important roles for all parties involved in the delivery of medical care.

AB - Background: The transition to the Next Accreditation System is well underway, and a shift toward competency-based assessment in the form of milestones is now the standard. A significant effort has been completed by the Plastic Surgery Milestones Working Group to develop specific milestones and assessment tools for plastic surgery training. Methods: The history of the development toward competency-based assessment was reviewed. Data regarding the trends and regulations associated with board certification and the role of maintenance of certification were reviewed. Results: The work of the Plastic Surgery Milestones Working Group has sparked interest in assessment and created an opportunity for further development. The efforts toward validating assessment tools by our colleagues working in other surgical specialties serve as a suitable roadmap for further progress. Board certification is an integral part of successful practice and should be regarded as an expectation. Despite the burdens associated with maintenance of certification, it serves a valuable function in ensuring optimal patient care and is often retrospectively seen as an important component of practice. Conclusions: The competency-based milestones are the new standard, and work on this new methodology of assessing plastic surgery trainees is expected to continue. Accurate assessment is critical to the pathways for board certification and maintenance of certification, which serve important roles for all parties involved in the delivery of medical care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964019077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964019077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002038

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002038

M3 - Article

C2 - 27018688

AN - SCOPUS:84964019077

VL - 137

SP - 1327

EP - 1333

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 4

ER -