Validation of Self-Reported Pain Reduction After Diagnostic Blockade

Brian R. Theodore, Sola Olamikan, Renee V. Keith, Michael Gofeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. The criterion commonly used to determine whether radiofrequency neurotomy may be recommended is based on patient-reported, short-term pain relief following facet block injections. This study evaluated the concordance between two commonly used outcomes for pain relief: the pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and the global perceived improvement (GPI) scale. Design. This is a retrospective cohort study. Methods. Data were obtained from a consecutive cohort of patients through a review of the electronic medical records, with the following inclusion criteria: medial branch facet blocks at either cervical or lumbar spinal regions. Outcome Measures. Pain NRS (baseline, postprocedure, and hourly up to 6 hours) and GPI scale are expressed as percent improvement at 6 hours, relative to baseline. Results. The percent improvement in pain NRS corresponded to 49%, 43%, 34%, 21%, and 36% for baseline vs immediately post-block, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours and average of all postscores, respectively. Average GPI reported at 6 hours was 44%, and differed significantly only to the baseline vs 6 hours percent improvement on the NRS (P<0.01). Multiple regression analysis indicated that there were no demographic or baseline factors that accounted for the discrepancy between GPI vs NRS. Conclusions. Asking patients about their pain relief in retrospect can be misleading. It is possible that patients' report on the GPI is weighed by their total experience of pain reduction and retrospective recall. Therefore, when choosing to address percent improvement on NRS measures, it is important to take into account multiple instances of NRS measures following treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1131-1136
Number of pages6
JournalPain Medicine (United States)
Volume13
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Pain
Lumbosacral Region
Electronic Health Records
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Regression Analysis
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Injections
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • Clinical significance
  • Measurement
  • Nerve block
  • Outcome assessment
  • Spine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Validation of Self-Reported Pain Reduction After Diagnostic Blockade. / Theodore, Brian R.; Olamikan, Sola; Keith, Renee V.; Gofeld, Michael.

In: Pain Medicine (United States), Vol. 13, No. 9, 09.2012, p. 1131-1136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Theodore, Brian R. ; Olamikan, Sola ; Keith, Renee V. ; Gofeld, Michael. / Validation of Self-Reported Pain Reduction After Diagnostic Blockade. In: Pain Medicine (United States). 2012 ; Vol. 13, No. 9. pp. 1131-1136.
@article{30a94e67dc53438c9fec811d523997cd,
title = "Validation of Self-Reported Pain Reduction After Diagnostic Blockade",
abstract = "Objective. The criterion commonly used to determine whether radiofrequency neurotomy may be recommended is based on patient-reported, short-term pain relief following facet block injections. This study evaluated the concordance between two commonly used outcomes for pain relief: the pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and the global perceived improvement (GPI) scale. Design. This is a retrospective cohort study. Methods. Data were obtained from a consecutive cohort of patients through a review of the electronic medical records, with the following inclusion criteria: medial branch facet blocks at either cervical or lumbar spinal regions. Outcome Measures. Pain NRS (baseline, postprocedure, and hourly up to 6 hours) and GPI scale are expressed as percent improvement at 6 hours, relative to baseline. Results. The percent improvement in pain NRS corresponded to 49{\%}, 43{\%}, 34{\%}, 21{\%}, and 36{\%} for baseline vs immediately post-block, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours and average of all postscores, respectively. Average GPI reported at 6 hours was 44{\%}, and differed significantly only to the baseline vs 6 hours percent improvement on the NRS (P<0.01). Multiple regression analysis indicated that there were no demographic or baseline factors that accounted for the discrepancy between GPI vs NRS. Conclusions. Asking patients about their pain relief in retrospect can be misleading. It is possible that patients' report on the GPI is weighed by their total experience of pain reduction and retrospective recall. Therefore, when choosing to address percent improvement on NRS measures, it is important to take into account multiple instances of NRS measures following treatment.",
keywords = "Chronic pain, Clinical significance, Measurement, Nerve block, Outcome assessment, Spine",
author = "Theodore, {Brian R.} and Sola Olamikan and Keith, {Renee V.} and Michael Gofeld",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01442.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "1131--1136",
journal = "Pain Medicine",
issn = "1526-2375",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of Self-Reported Pain Reduction After Diagnostic Blockade

AU - Theodore, Brian R.

AU - Olamikan, Sola

AU - Keith, Renee V.

AU - Gofeld, Michael

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Objective. The criterion commonly used to determine whether radiofrequency neurotomy may be recommended is based on patient-reported, short-term pain relief following facet block injections. This study evaluated the concordance between two commonly used outcomes for pain relief: the pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and the global perceived improvement (GPI) scale. Design. This is a retrospective cohort study. Methods. Data were obtained from a consecutive cohort of patients through a review of the electronic medical records, with the following inclusion criteria: medial branch facet blocks at either cervical or lumbar spinal regions. Outcome Measures. Pain NRS (baseline, postprocedure, and hourly up to 6 hours) and GPI scale are expressed as percent improvement at 6 hours, relative to baseline. Results. The percent improvement in pain NRS corresponded to 49%, 43%, 34%, 21%, and 36% for baseline vs immediately post-block, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours and average of all postscores, respectively. Average GPI reported at 6 hours was 44%, and differed significantly only to the baseline vs 6 hours percent improvement on the NRS (P<0.01). Multiple regression analysis indicated that there were no demographic or baseline factors that accounted for the discrepancy between GPI vs NRS. Conclusions. Asking patients about their pain relief in retrospect can be misleading. It is possible that patients' report on the GPI is weighed by their total experience of pain reduction and retrospective recall. Therefore, when choosing to address percent improvement on NRS measures, it is important to take into account multiple instances of NRS measures following treatment.

AB - Objective. The criterion commonly used to determine whether radiofrequency neurotomy may be recommended is based on patient-reported, short-term pain relief following facet block injections. This study evaluated the concordance between two commonly used outcomes for pain relief: the pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and the global perceived improvement (GPI) scale. Design. This is a retrospective cohort study. Methods. Data were obtained from a consecutive cohort of patients through a review of the electronic medical records, with the following inclusion criteria: medial branch facet blocks at either cervical or lumbar spinal regions. Outcome Measures. Pain NRS (baseline, postprocedure, and hourly up to 6 hours) and GPI scale are expressed as percent improvement at 6 hours, relative to baseline. Results. The percent improvement in pain NRS corresponded to 49%, 43%, 34%, 21%, and 36% for baseline vs immediately post-block, 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours and average of all postscores, respectively. Average GPI reported at 6 hours was 44%, and differed significantly only to the baseline vs 6 hours percent improvement on the NRS (P<0.01). Multiple regression analysis indicated that there were no demographic or baseline factors that accounted for the discrepancy between GPI vs NRS. Conclusions. Asking patients about their pain relief in retrospect can be misleading. It is possible that patients' report on the GPI is weighed by their total experience of pain reduction and retrospective recall. Therefore, when choosing to address percent improvement on NRS measures, it is important to take into account multiple instances of NRS measures following treatment.

KW - Chronic pain

KW - Clinical significance

KW - Measurement

KW - Nerve block

KW - Outcome assessment

KW - Spine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866302233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866302233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01442.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01442.x

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1131

EP - 1136

JO - Pain Medicine

JF - Pain Medicine

SN - 1526-2375

IS - 9

ER -