Value of measurements of DNA repair levels in predicting carcinogenic potential of chemicals

J. E. Cleaver, R. Goth, E. C. Friedberg

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chemicals can interact with genetic material either by causing damage that necessitates DNA repair or by inhibiting processes that repair DNA damage caused by other agents. Damage can be repaired by excision repair, which acts throughout the cell cycle and is considered an error free system, or by postreplication repair, which acts only during the DNA synthesis period and is considered error prone. The amount of excision repair that occurs under various conditions of chemical exposure is an indication of the amount of repairable damage, but it is only an indirect indication of the mutagenic potential of a chemical since the mutagenic potential and, by implication, the carcinogenic potential depend on the amount of damage that is not repaired. In addition, although most chemicals that damage DNA elicit excision repair, some, notably those that intercalate in DNA electrostatically, actually inhibit excision repair. But these and other inhibitory chemicals, including tumor promoters, inhibit all DNA functions to a similar extent; that is, they do not act specifically on excision repair. Measurements of excision repair or of its inhibition by chemicals thus bear a complex and currently unpredictable relation to the mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of any chemical and should be used with caution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationIARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) Scientific Publications
Pages639-661
Number of pages23
Volumeno.12
StatePublished - 1976

Fingerprint

DNA Repair
DNA Damage
DNA
Carcinogens
Cell Cycle
Genes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Cleaver, J. E., Goth, R., & Friedberg, E. C. (1976). Value of measurements of DNA repair levels in predicting carcinogenic potential of chemicals. In IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) Scientific Publications (Vol. no.12, pp. 639-661)

Value of measurements of DNA repair levels in predicting carcinogenic potential of chemicals. / Cleaver, J. E.; Goth, R.; Friedberg, E. C.

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) Scientific Publications. Vol. no.12 1976. p. 639-661.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Cleaver, JE, Goth, R & Friedberg, EC 1976, Value of measurements of DNA repair levels in predicting carcinogenic potential of chemicals. in IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) Scientific Publications. vol. no.12, pp. 639-661.
Cleaver JE, Goth R, Friedberg EC. Value of measurements of DNA repair levels in predicting carcinogenic potential of chemicals. In IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) Scientific Publications. Vol. no.12. 1976. p. 639-661
Cleaver, J. E. ; Goth, R. ; Friedberg, E. C. / Value of measurements of DNA repair levels in predicting carcinogenic potential of chemicals. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) Scientific Publications. Vol. no.12 1976. pp. 639-661
@inbook{b5856ff62dcf411f976e4fde32487aea,
title = "Value of measurements of DNA repair levels in predicting carcinogenic potential of chemicals",
abstract = "Chemicals can interact with genetic material either by causing damage that necessitates DNA repair or by inhibiting processes that repair DNA damage caused by other agents. Damage can be repaired by excision repair, which acts throughout the cell cycle and is considered an error free system, or by postreplication repair, which acts only during the DNA synthesis period and is considered error prone. The amount of excision repair that occurs under various conditions of chemical exposure is an indication of the amount of repairable damage, but it is only an indirect indication of the mutagenic potential of a chemical since the mutagenic potential and, by implication, the carcinogenic potential depend on the amount of damage that is not repaired. In addition, although most chemicals that damage DNA elicit excision repair, some, notably those that intercalate in DNA electrostatically, actually inhibit excision repair. But these and other inhibitory chemicals, including tumor promoters, inhibit all DNA functions to a similar extent; that is, they do not act specifically on excision repair. Measurements of excision repair or of its inhibition by chemicals thus bear a complex and currently unpredictable relation to the mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of any chemical and should be used with caution.",
author = "Cleaver, {J. E.} and R. Goth and Friedberg, {E. C.}",
year = "1976",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "no.12",
pages = "639--661",
booktitle = "IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) Scientific Publications",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Value of measurements of DNA repair levels in predicting carcinogenic potential of chemicals

AU - Cleaver, J. E.

AU - Goth, R.

AU - Friedberg, E. C.

PY - 1976

Y1 - 1976

N2 - Chemicals can interact with genetic material either by causing damage that necessitates DNA repair or by inhibiting processes that repair DNA damage caused by other agents. Damage can be repaired by excision repair, which acts throughout the cell cycle and is considered an error free system, or by postreplication repair, which acts only during the DNA synthesis period and is considered error prone. The amount of excision repair that occurs under various conditions of chemical exposure is an indication of the amount of repairable damage, but it is only an indirect indication of the mutagenic potential of a chemical since the mutagenic potential and, by implication, the carcinogenic potential depend on the amount of damage that is not repaired. In addition, although most chemicals that damage DNA elicit excision repair, some, notably those that intercalate in DNA electrostatically, actually inhibit excision repair. But these and other inhibitory chemicals, including tumor promoters, inhibit all DNA functions to a similar extent; that is, they do not act specifically on excision repair. Measurements of excision repair or of its inhibition by chemicals thus bear a complex and currently unpredictable relation to the mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of any chemical and should be used with caution.

AB - Chemicals can interact with genetic material either by causing damage that necessitates DNA repair or by inhibiting processes that repair DNA damage caused by other agents. Damage can be repaired by excision repair, which acts throughout the cell cycle and is considered an error free system, or by postreplication repair, which acts only during the DNA synthesis period and is considered error prone. The amount of excision repair that occurs under various conditions of chemical exposure is an indication of the amount of repairable damage, but it is only an indirect indication of the mutagenic potential of a chemical since the mutagenic potential and, by implication, the carcinogenic potential depend on the amount of damage that is not repaired. In addition, although most chemicals that damage DNA elicit excision repair, some, notably those that intercalate in DNA electrostatically, actually inhibit excision repair. But these and other inhibitory chemicals, including tumor promoters, inhibit all DNA functions to a similar extent; that is, they do not act specifically on excision repair. Measurements of excision repair or of its inhibition by chemicals thus bear a complex and currently unpredictable relation to the mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of any chemical and should be used with caution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017161785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017161785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:0017161785

VL - no.12

SP - 639

EP - 661

BT - IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) Scientific Publications

ER -